Skip to main content
Log in

Research in education: What influence on policy and practice?

  • Feature Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge and Policy

Abstract

This paper is set in a context where increased emphasis is being placed on the “consumer’s” role in research. It discusses the limitations of “knowledge base” approaches, which aim to deliver the findings of educational research to practitioners and policymakers. The tensions between what these consumers expect of research and what it can, in fact, offer are explored, and the conditions under which effective communication can be established are outlined and exemplified. It is argued, however, that the processes of such communication, if they are to establish the necessary engagement of consumers with researchers, will have to take account of the ways in which consumers are motivated and able to acquire new knowledge. In conclusion, it is argued that if the engagement is unsuccessful and the consumers are unconvinced of the value and validity of research findings for policy and practice, then researchers’ ideas will take a back seat in the debate about what is to count as high-quality work that should be funded. The function of research as the critical extension of knowledge may then be replaced by enquiry that comes up with the results the customer wants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, S. (1985). The promotion of educational research—Scottish style, in Nisbet J., Megarry J., and Nisbet S.,World Yearbook of Education 1985: Research policy and practice. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1991). Effective contributions from research to educational conversations: Style and strategy.British Educational Research Journal, 17, 1: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1993).Professional Development Through Research. Interchange No. 16, Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. and McIntyre, D. (1993).Making Sense of Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 30, 2: 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929).The Sources of a Science of Education. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchy of Lancaster. (1993).Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology (White Paper). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1990). Educational research in crisis: Performance indicators and the decline in excellence.British Educational Research Journal, 16, 1: 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R.F. (1993). What knowledge base?Review of Educational Research, 63, 3: 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V. and Waddington, T. (1993). From evidence to knowledge to policy: Research synthesis for policy formation.Review of Educational Research, 63, 3: 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliebard, H.M. (1993). What is a knowledge base and who would use it if we had one?Review of Educational Research, 63, 3: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J. (1988). The contribution of research to education, in Brown, S. and Wake, R. (Eds.),Education in Transition. Edinburgh: SCRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclure, M. and Stronach, I. (1994).Deconstructing the Notion of “Policy Hysteria”: Five readings, some unprincipled couplings and no happy endings. Paper presented to AERA, New Orleans, April 1994.

  • Palincsar, A.S. and McPhail, J.C. (1993). A critique of metaphor of distillation, in “Towards a knowledge base for school learning.”Review of Educational Research, 63, 3: 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.M. (1913).Scientific Management in Education. New York: Hinds, Noble and Eldridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. (1983). Knowledge synthesis and problem solving, in Ward S.A. and Reed L.J. (Eds.),Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation, 285–312. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. and Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria, in Ward S.A. and Reed L.J. (Eds.),Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation, 285–312. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (1986).What Works: Research about Teaching and Learning, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D. and Walberg, H.J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning.Review of Educational Research, 63, 3: 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Her current research interests are in the relationships among policy, practice and research, teachers’ thinking, provision for children with special educational needs and gender in education. Her best known recent book, with Donald McIntyre, isMaking Sense of Teaching (Open University Press).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, S. Research in education: What influence on policy and practice?. Knowledge and Policy 7, 94–107 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696294

Keywords

Navigation