Abstract
There has been increasing concern in a number of countries about the perceived deterioration of schools that serve immigrant, minority or poor children. Field reports suggest that such schools tend to be bureaucratic, politicized, and isolated from the most up-to-date information about educational innovations that may improve the educational opportunities for disadvantaged children. Even in countries with relatively well-established dissemination systems, these schools may be “out of the knowledge utilization loop.” In this paper, the organizational properties of U.S. urban schools that may lead to their isolation from knowledge will be discussed, and a variety of strategies to improve dissemination and utilization will be outlined, including political/community organizing, linking dissemination to organization development, increasing the salience of ties between universities and schools, the development of teacher networks, and action research. The paper will conclude with some principles for designing a dissemination system that will effectively promote knowledge utilization in urban centers. p]The conditions in some of our schools are so bad, and the physical and social environments in which these schools are located are so frightful, that we may have to cross off some...as expendable. (Halpin, 1966, as quoted in Englert, 1993: 3.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple, M. (1991). The politics of curriculum and teaching.NASSP Bulletin, February, 39–50.
Ascher, C. (1989). School-college collaborations: A strategy for helping low-income minorities.The Urban Review, 21, 181–191.
Bank, A. & Williams, R. (Eds.) (1987).Information Systems and School Improvement: Inventing the Future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bryk, A.S., & Driscoll, M.W. (1988).The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1988).An Imperiled Generation: Saving Urban Schools. Princeton, N.J.
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986).Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer.
Cibulka, J. (1992). Urban education as a field of study: Problems of knowledge and power. In J. Cibulka, R. Reed, and K. Wong (Eds.),The Politics of Education in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
Corcoran, T., Walker, L., & White, J.L. (1988).Working in Urban Schools. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.
Corwin, R. & Louis, K.S. (1982). Organizational barriers to the utilization of research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 623–640.
Daft, R. & Huber, G. (1987). How organizations learn. In N. DiTomaso and S. Bacharach (Eds.),Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI (vol. 5).
Englert, R. (1993). Understanding the urban context and conditions of practice of school administration. In P. Forsyth and M. Tallerico (Eds.),City Schools: Leading the Way. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Fullan, M., Miles, M., & Taylor, G. (1980). Organization development in schools: The state of the art.Review of Educational Research, 50, 121–183.
Garner, C. & Raudenbush, S. (1991). Neighborhood effects of educational attainment: A multilevel analysis.Sociology of Education, 64, 251–262.
Goldring, E. (1990). The district context and principals’ sentiments toward parents.Urban Education, 24, 391–403.
Harkavy, I. & Puckett, J. (1992). Universities and the inner cities.Planning for Higher Education, 20, 27–33.
Hill, P., Wise, A., & Shapiro, L. (1989).Educational progress. Cities mobilize to improve their schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 363–391.
Klein, S. (1992). A framework for redesigning an R&D based national educational dissemination system in the United States.Knowledge, 13, 256–286.
Kruse, S. D. & Louis, K.S. (1993). A framework for analyzing school-based professional community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Levitt, B. & March, J.G. (1988). Organizational learning.Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
Louis, K.S. (1991). Social and community values and the quality of teachers’ work life. In M. McLaughlin, J. Talbert and N. Bascia (Eds.),The Context of Teachers’ Work in Secondary Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Louis, K.S. (1992). Comparative perspectives on dissemination and knowledge use policies: Supporting School Improvement.Knowledge, 13, 287–304.
Louis, K.S. (1994). Beyond Managed Change: Rethinking how schools change.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 2–24.
Louis, K.S. & Dentler, R.A. (1988). Knowledge use and school improvement.Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 32–62.
Louis, K.S. & Miles, M. (1990).Reforming the Urban High School: What Works and Why. New York: Teachers College Press.
Louis, K.S., Rosenblum, S. & Molitor, J. (1981).Strategies for knowledge use and school improvement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Lytle, J. (1990). Reforming urban education: A review of recent reports and legislation.The Urban Review, 22, 199–220.
March, J. & Olsen, J. (1976).Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
McDonnell, L. & Pascal, A. (1988).Teacher Unions and Educational Reform. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Natriello, G., McDill, E. & Pallas, A. (1990).Schooling Disadvantaged Children: Racing Against Catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.
Pallas, A., Natriello, G., & McDill, E. (1989). The changing nature of the disadvantaged population: Current dimensions and future trends.Educational Researcher, June–July, 16–22.
Patton, M. (1988). Extension’s future: Beyond technology transfer.Knowledge, 9, 476–491.
Peterson, P. (1985).The Politics of School Reform: 1870–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ravitch, D. (1974). The rhetoric of decentralization.New York Affairs, 1, 102–110.
Raywid, M. (1993). Finding time for collaboration.Educational Leadership, 51, 30–34.
Reese, W. (1986).Power and the Promise of School Reform: Grassroots Movements During the Progressive Era. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rogers, E. (1982).Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rollow, S. & Bryk, A. (1993). Catalyzing professional community in a school reform left behind. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rosenblum, S. & Louis, K.S. (1981).Stability and Change. New York: Praeger.
Rosenblum, S., Louis, K.S., & Rossmiller, R. (1994). School leadership and teacher quality of work life in restructuring schools. In J. Murphy and K.S. Louis (Eds.),Reshaping the Principalship: Insights from Transformational Reform Efforts. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
Ruffin, S. (1989). Improving urban communities and their schools: A national emergency.NASSP Bulletin, May, 61–70.
Schmuck, R. & Rankel, P. (1985). The Handbook of Organization Development in Schools. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Senge, P. (1990).The Fifth Dimension: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Turner, P. (1993).Toward establishing professional development schools: Faculty perceptions in colleges and schools of education in the Holmes Group. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Wahlberg, H. (1989). District size and learning.Education and Urban Society, 21, 154–163.
Wahlstrom, K. & Louis, K.S. (1993). Adoption revisited: Decision-making and school district policy. In S. Bachrach and R. Ogawa (Eds.),Advances in Research and Theory of School Management and Educational Policy, Vol. 1, 61–119. Greenwood, CT: JAI Press.
Wehlage, G. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The New Futures experiment.American Educational Research Journal, 29, 51–93.
Weick, K. (1978). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Weiss, C. (1993). Structuring the field: Designing and teaching a course in knowledge use. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
White, J. & Wehlage, G. (1994). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard to do? Madison, WI: Center for the Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Her research and teaching interests include innovation processes in education, knowledge use in schools, and schools as workplaces. Recent publications include articles on social values and the quality of teacher work life,Reforming the Urban High School: What Works and Why with Matthew B. Miles, andReshaping the Principalship, with Joe Murphy.
The preparation of this paper was supported, in part, by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Effective Secondary Schools, which was funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (Grant No. G-008690007). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of either of the supporting agencies. An earlier version was presented at a conference on dissemination and school improvement held at Haifa University, June 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Louis, K.S. Improving urban and disadvantaged schools: Dissemination and utilization perspectives. Knowledge and Policy 7, 34–54 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696291
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696291