Skip to main content
Log in

Diamondback terrapin mortality in the American eel pot fishery and evaluation of a bycatch reduction device

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of commercial fisheries on nontarget species is a burgeoning issue for both fishery managers and estuarine biologists. We documented diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) bycatch in cloth-funnel eel pots used in a Maryland (United States) commercial American eel (Anguilla rostrata) fishery. Between 1992 and 2001, we obtained 40 male and 9 female terrapin captures and 1 male terrapin recapture from commercial eel pots. To quantify terrapin catch rates and evaluate a potential solution to terrapin bycatch in eel pots, we conducted two experiments that tested the effects of a novel cel pot bycatch reduction device on terrapin bycatch and eel harvest. We determined low terrapin bycatch rates (0.000–0.008 terrapins pot−1 d−1) in pots with small entrance funnels and high terrapin capture rates (0.458 terrapins pot−1 d−1) in pots with large entrance funnels. The BRD eliminated terrapin bycatch and had no effect on eel catch making it an economically-viable solution for terrapin mortality in eel pots. We demonstrated that terrapin bycatch can be a problem in the American eel pot fishery and that our bycatch reduction device is a simple and cost-effective solution to this problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alverson, D. L. A., M. H. Freeburg, J. G. Pope, and S. A. Murawski. 1994. A global assessment of fisheries bycatch discards. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Fisheries Technical Paper No. 339. Rome, Italy.

  • Buck, E. H. 1990. Turtle excluder devices: Sea turtles and/or shrimp? Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service Document No. 90-327 ENR, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. 1952. The Handbook of Turtles. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. V. andT. E. Helser. 2001. Effect of three by-catch reduction devices on diamondback terrapin,Malaclemys terrapin, capture and blue crab,Callinectes sapidus, harvest in Delaware Bay.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:825–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, J. D., A. E. Dunham, andR. C. van Loben sels. 1993. Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingi): Implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms.Conservation Biology 7:826–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, J. D., A. E. Dunham, andR. C. van Loben sels. 1994. Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): Implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms.American Zoologist 34:397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K., S. F. Thrush, M. T. Agardy, andR. J. Hofman. 1995. Invironmental effects of marine fishing.Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5:205–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. L., L. G. Cowell, andL. B. Crowder. 2000. Population effects of shrimp trawl by-catch on Atlantic croaker.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:2010–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, N. B. 1992. Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology.Conservation Biology 6:179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. W., J. E. Lovich, A. D. Tucker, N. N. Fitzsimons, andJ. L. Greene. 2001. Demographic and ecological factors affecting conservation and management of the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) in South Carolina.Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillory, V. andP. Prejean. 1998. Effect of a terrapin excluder device on blue crab,Callinectes sapidus, trap catches.Marine Fisheries Review 6:38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. A., D. L. Alverson, andK. I. Metuzals. 2000. By-catch: Problems and solutions.Marine Pollution Bulletin 41:204–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, S. S. Application of life-history theory and population analysis to turtle conservation.Copeia 1998:367–375.

  • Hoyle, M. E. andJ. W. Gibbons. 2000. Use of a marked population of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) to determine impacts of recreational crab pots.Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3:735–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inchausti, P. andH. Weimerskirch. 2001. Risks of decline and extinction of the endangered Amsterdam albatross and the projected impact of long-line fisheries.Biological Conservation 100:377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, J. J., K. A. Bjorndal, W. D. Dupaul, G. L. Graham, D. W. Oins, C. H. Peterson, P. H. C. Pritchard, J. I. Richardson, G. E. Saul, andC. W. Ist. 1990. Decline of the Sea Turtles: Causes and Prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M. 1991. The diamondback terrapin: Habitat requirements, population dynamics, and opportunities for conservation, p. 227–234.In J. A. Mihursky and A. Chaney (eds.), Proceedings New Perspectives in the Chesapeake System: A Research and Management Partnership. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Solomons, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M. 2004. The impact of crab pot fisheries on terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) populations: Where are we and where do we need to go?, p. 23–30.In C. Swarth, W. M. Roosenburg, and E. Kiviat (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Turtles of the Mid-Atlantic Region. Bibliomania, Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M., W. Cresko, M. Modesitte, andM. B. Robbins. 1997. Diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) mortality in crab pots.Conservation Biology 5:1166–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M. andA. E. Dunham. 1997. Allocation of reproductive output: Egg and clutch size variation in the diamondback terrapin.Copeia 1997:290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M. andJ. P. Green. 2000. Impact of a by-catch reduction device on diamondback terrapin and blue crab capture in crab pots.Ecological Applications 10:822–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosenburg, W. M., K. Halley, andS. McGuire. 1999. Habitat selection and movements of the diamondback terrapin,Malaclemys terrapin, in a Maryland estuary.Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3:425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, R. A. 1993. Apparent long-term declines in diamondback terrapin populations at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida.Herpetological Review 24:102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, R. A., C. K. Dodd, andM. W. Klemens. 2000. Manipulation of turtle populations for conservation: Halfway technologies or viable options?, p. 218–238.In M. W. Klemens (ed.), Turtle Conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, R. A. andJ. W. Gibbons. 1995. Workshop on the ecology, status, and management of the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin): Final results and recommendations.Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1:240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., C. R. Tracy, andC. R. Tracy. 2003. Estimating age of turtle from growth rings: A critical evaluation of the technique.Herpetologica 59:178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. C. 1997. The impact of commercial crab traps on northern diamondback terrapinsMalaclemys terrapin terrapin, p. 21–27.In J. van Abbema (ed.), Proceedings Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Tortoises and Turtles—An International Conference. New York Turtle and Tortoise Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem M. Roosenburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radzio, T.A., Roosenburg, W.M. Diamondback terrapin mortality in the American eel pot fishery and evaluation of a bycatch reduction device. Estuaries 28, 620–626 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696072

Keywords

Navigation