Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immoral, inviolate or inconclusive?

  • Pornography And Its Discontents
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Readings suggested by the author

  • Baron, Larry and Straus, Murray A. “Rape and Its Relationship to Social Disorganization, Pornography, and Sexual Inequality in the United States.” Paper presented at the International Congress on Rape, Tel Aviv, Israel, April 7–11, 1986.

  • Lynn, Barry W. “‘Civil Rights’ Ordinances and the Attorney General’s Commission: New Developments in Pornography Regulation.”Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 21 (1986).

  • Malamuth, Neil M. and Donnerstein, Edward, eds.Pornography and Sexual Aggression. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobile, Philip and Nadler, Eric.United States of America vs. Sex: How the Meese Commission Lied about Pornography. New York: Minotaur Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Carole S. “The Meese Commission on the Road.”The Nation (August 2–9, 1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He has held postdoctoral fellowships in the Family Violence Research Program at the University of New Hampshire and the Sociology of Social Control at Yale University. He testified as an expert witness at the Meese Commission hearings in Houston; and he is completing a book with Murray A. Straus on rape in the United States.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, L. Immoral, inviolate or inconclusive?. Society 24, 6–12 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02695659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02695659

Keywords

Navigation