Skip to main content
Log in

Designing an instrument for resolving individual conflicts in “Total” institutions

  • Evaluation And Intervention
  • Published:
Knowledge and Policy

Abstract

Individual complaint and grievance arbitration as a means to solve conflicts between individuals and organizations is especially useful as a management tool in situations involving a power difference between conflicting parties, as in employer-employee relationships or in total institutions. To design an instrument for solving individual conflicts in total organizations, influences of organizational structure, organizational climate, and grievance system on the resolution of individual conflicts were examined. The data were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis and considered in light of theoretical notions in organizational sociology, sociology of law, and conflict theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, R. L. (1982).The contradictions of informal justice. The American experience. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M. (1979). Conflict and constitutionalism in organizations.Social Science Information, 1.

  • Galanter, M. (1974). Why the haves come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change.Law and Society, 95.

  • Ippel, P. (1987).Klachtbehandeling an klachtprocedures. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1979).Organization and management. New York.

  • King, C. D., & van de Vall, M. (1978).Models of industrial democracy: Consultation, co-determination and workers’ management. The Hague/New York: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, P. L. (1983).Toekomstperspectief voor industriele democratisering en ontplooiing in het werk? Vakgroep Arbeidsen Organisatie psychologie. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, C. J. (1978). The comparative sociology of organizations.Annual Review of Sociology.

  • Lammers, C. J. (1983).Organisaties Vergelijkenderwijs, Ontwikkeling an relevantie van het sociologisch denken over organisaties. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Het Spectrum publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mante-Meijer, E. A., & van Helvert, J. (1982). Individueel klachtrecht, het SER advies getoetst aan de sociale werkelijkheid.Sociaal Maandblad Arbeid, Feb., 101–120.

  • Mante-Meijer, E. A., Ippel, P., & van Helvert, J. (1987). Klagen vergelijkenderwijs.Beleid en Maatschappij, 2, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mante-Meijer, E. A. (1989).Conflicten in Organisaties, Individuele Klachten en hun behandeling. Academisch Boeken Centrum, De Lier.

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1959).Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. R., & Greenwood, E. (1980).The design of social policy research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979).The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G (1986).Images of organization. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein, H. (1982).Conflicthaniering door een derde partij. Lisse.

  • Simon, H.A. (1976).Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, M. J., van den Heuvel, P. A. M., & Meulenpas, M. A. (1986).Ervaringen van zorggebruikers. Een onderzoek naar ervaringen met de gezondheidszorg en met de behandeling van klachten over de zorg in regio Tiel. Nijmegen.

  • van de Vall, M. (1988).A comparative case method for “local molar” program evaluation and adjustment. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (A.S.A.), Atlanta, GA, August 24–28. Session no. 45, Section on Sociological Practice: Linkages of Policy and Practice.

  • Ziegenfuss, J. T. (1985).Patient/client/employee complaint programs. An organizational systems model. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijderveld, A. C. (1970).The abstract society. A cultural analysis of our time. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Enid Mante-Meijer was a lecturer at the faculty of Sociology of Leyden University in 1988 she became senior researcher at the Royal Dutch PTT Research Institute for Applied Social Science Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mante-Meijer, E. Designing an instrument for resolving individual conflicts in “Total” institutions. Knowledge and Policy 4, 58–72 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693088

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693088

Keywords

Navigation