Abstract
This article is a critical, sociological examination of policy advice aimed at reducing or limiting CO2 emissions. The policy proposals are taken from various sources directed to governmental or economic institutions and targeted to cope with the natural and social consequences of global warming. We ask, based on a sociological understanding of features constitutive of practical social science knowledge, how feasible and practical are various policy proposals. Our assessment, in turn, is based on a theoretical model of the characteristics ofpractical scientific knowledge, which is discussed in conjunction with the current field of climate change knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eder, K. (1989).The idea of progress and the problem of nature: Some implications of the current ecological crisis for social theory. Paper presented to the International Conference on Social Progress and Social Theory: Movements, Forces and Ideas at the End of the 20th Century.
Flavin, C. (1989).Slowing global warming: A worldwide strategy. Worldwatch Paper 91. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.
Flavin, C. (1990). Slowing global warming. InState of the World 1990: A Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society (pp. 17–38). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
German Bundestag. (1989).Protecting the Earth’s atmosphere: An international challenge. Interim report of the study commission of the 11th German Bundestag “Preventive measures to protect the Earth’s atmosphere.” Bonn: German Bundestag.
Giddens, A. (1990). R.K. Merton on structural analysis. In J. Clark, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.),Robert K. Merton: Consensus and controversy (pp. 97–110). London: Falmer Press.
Goldemberg, J. (1990). Policy responses to global warming. In J. Leggett (Ed.),Global warming: The Greenpeace report (pp. 166–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heilbroner, R. (1991). Economics as universal science.Social Research, 58 (2), 457–474.
Hogan, K.B., Hoffman, J.S., & Thompson, A.M. (1991). Methane on the greenhouse agenda.Nature, 354 (6350), 181–182.
Houghton, R.A., & Woodwell, G.M. (1989). Global climatic change.Scientific American, 260 (4), 36–44.
Jamieson, D. (1992). Ethics, public policy, and global warming.Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17 (2), 139–153.
Kempton, W. (1991). Lay perspectives on global climate change.Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 1 (3), 183–208.
Latour, B. (1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lelieveld, J., & Crutzen, P.J. (1992). Indirect chemical effects of methane on climate warming.Nature, 355 (23), 339–343.
Lyman, F., Mintzer, I., Courrier, K., & MacKenzie, J. (1990).The greenhouse trap: What we’re doing to the atmosphere and how we can slow global warming. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mannheim, K. 1936 [1929].Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mannheim, K. (1940).Man and society in an age of reconstruction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Marchetti, C. (1988).How to solve the CO2 problem without tears. Paper presented to the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Marcuse, H. (1964).One dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Merton, R.K. (1975). Social knowledge and public policy: Sociological perspectives on four presidential commissions. In M. Komarovshky (Ed.),Sociology and public policy: The case of presidential commissions (pp. 153–177). New York: Elsevier.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1991).Climate change: Evaluating the socioeconomic impacts. Paris: OECD.
Pearce, D. (1991). Evaluating the socio-economic impacts of climate change: An introduction. InClimate change: Evaluating the socio-economic impacts (pp. 9–20). Paris: OECD.
Pearce, F. (1989).Turning up the heat: Our perilous future in the global greenhouse. London: The Bodley Head.
Perrow, C. (1984).Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.
Seitz, F., Jastrow, W., & Nierenberg, W.A. (1989).Scientific perspectives on the greenhouse problem. Washington, DC: George C. Marshall Institute.
Snow, C.P. (1962).Science and government. New York: Mentor.
Stavins, R.N. (1992).Global environmental agreements, domestic productivity, and international competitiveness: Challenges and opportunities. Paper Presented to the Smithsonian Conference on U.S. Economic Opportunities in Global Environmental Agreements, Washington, D.C., March 7.
Stehr, N. (1992).Practical knowledge: Applying the social sciences. London: Sage.
Wong, R.K.W. (1989).Towards a strategy for adapting to climate change in Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Research Council.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987).Our common future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Meteorological Organization. (1988). Working Group Report on “Decision making and uncertainty.” InThe changing atmosphere: Implications for global security. Conference proceedings. Toronto, Canada, 27–30 June 1988 (pp. 338–340). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
World Meteorological Organization & United Nationsl Environment Programme. (1988).Developing policies for responding to climatic change. A summary of the discussions and recommendations of the workshops held in Villach (28 September–2 October 1987) and Bellagio (9–13 November 1987) under the auspices of the Beijer Institute, Stockholm. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
He is currently the editor of theCanadian Journal of Sociology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Messner, W., Bray, D., Germain, G.C. et al. Climate change and social order: Knowledge for action?. Knowledge and Policy 5, 82–100 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692777
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692777