Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Ph.D. sociology programs: Theoretical, methodological and policy implications

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reputational surveys frequently are used in evaluating doctoral programs. A sample of faculty-rated graduate programs and the resulting data are used to rank the programs in the academic discipline being considered. As an alternative, we present a new and auspicious assessment methodology by analyzing sixty doctoral programs in sociology for 1975/80 on six measures of research productivity and graduate education. We calculate two proximity matrices and reduce each with ALSCAL. Two solutions are generated: (1) per capita and (2) gross productivity of departments. These analyses show that conventional ranks contain a number of deficiencies and more comprehensive measures of departmental performance add important dimensions. We empirically document a tendency for conflict between faculty productivity and graduate education. Finally, our analyses suggest that omission of several assessment variables may have penalized departments emphasizing qualitative research. Recommendations for improving the next national assessment are advanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Walter F. and Henry M. Barlow. 1972. “Stratification Theory and Organizational Rank: Resources, Functions, and Organizational Prestige in American Universities.”Pacific Sociological Review 15:401–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Hazard. 1988.The Academic Tribes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, Alexander. 1985.Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, Jeffrey H. and William E. Thompson. 1985. “The Academic Elite in Sociology: A Reassessment of Top-Ranked Graduate Programs.”Mid-American Review of Sociology 10:37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, Leonard L. 1986. “What Characterizes a Productive Research Department?”Research in Higher Education 25:211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakanic, Von, Clark McPhail, and Rita J. Simon. “The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process.”American Sociological Review 52:631–42.

  • Barzun, Jaques. 1981. “The Wasteland of American Education.”The New York Review of Books (November 5):34–36.

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swider, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985.Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. and Bebecca Zames Margulies. 1975. “The Reputations of American Professional Schools.”Change 6:42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Howard R. and Jack H. Schuster. 1986.American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell Gibson and Gareth Morgan. 1979.Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, Allan. 1966.An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Mary J., Rodney T. Harnett, and Leonard L. Baird. 1976.Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Doctoral Education: A Technical Report of a National Study in Three Fields. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G. 1963.Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. “Historical Perspective.” Pp. 11–25 inIncomplete Data in Sample Surveys. Volume II, edited by William G. Madow, Harold Nisselson, and Ingram Olkin. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Jonathan R. and Stephen Cole. 1973.Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Clifton F. and Robert T. Blackburn. 1985. “Program Quality in Higher Education: A Review and Critique of Literature and Research.” Pp. 283–308 inHigher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana. 1970 “Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition.”American Sociological Review 30:699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, W. Patrick. 1976.The Ranking Game: The Power of the Academic Elite.. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, David E. and Ronald Karpf. 1981. “Ranking Academic Departments: Empirical Findings and a Theoretical Perspective.”Research in Higher Education 14 (May/June):305–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fechter, Alan. 1988. Personnal Communication.

  • Fowler, Floyd J. 1988.Survey Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert. 1988. “Encouraging NSF Funding of Qualitative Research.”ASA Footnotes 16 (May):3, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Norval D. and Wayne Villemez. 1970. “The Productivity of Sociologists at 45 American Universities.”The American Sociologist 5:244–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Michael H. 1987.Federal Rules of Evidence. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert H. and William J. Abernathy. 1980. “Managing Our Way to Economic Decline.”Harvard Business Review 58 (July–August):67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, Robert. 1988.Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, Christopher and David Riesman. 1977.The Academic Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Lyle V., Gardner Lindzey, and Porter E. Coggeshell. 1982.An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1983.The Change Masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Dean D. and Ted R. Vaughan. 1969. “Quality in Graduate Education: A Re-Evaluation of the Rankings of Sociology Departments in the Cartter Report.”The American Sociologist 4:12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Wilbert M. and Raymond L. Schmitt. 1973. “Institutional Representation at the 1970, 1971, and 1972 American Sociological Association Annual Meetings.”Sociology and Social Research 58:6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Lionel S. 1968. “On Subjective and Objective Rankings of Sociology Departments.”The American Sociologist 3:129–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, David. 1982.Best Evidence. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • William G. Madow, Harold Nisselson, and Ingram Olkin. 1983.Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys. Volume I. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, Barry, David Willer, and Travis Patton. 1988. “Power Relations in Exchange Networks.”American Sociological Review 53:220–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, {jrJr.}, Murray. 1987. “Theories Inequality: An Overview and a Strategy for Synthesis.”Social Forces 65:1053–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David R., Richard C. Kearney, and James L. Regens. 1976. “Assessing Quality Among Graduate Institutions of Higher Education in the United States.”Social Science Quarterly 57:670–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, Daniel. 1984. “An Anti-Benthamite View: An Economist Looks at College Rankings.”Change 16 (March):45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, William. 1980. “The Tacit Conventions of the Modernity School: An Analysis of Key Assumptions.”American Sociological Review 45:244–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— and Paul J. Baker. 1989a. “The Organized Contradictions of Academe.”Teaching Sociology 17:161–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989b. “On the Unfinished Work of Connecting Problems to Solutions: Some Thoughts on Bowker and Gamson.”Teaching Sociology 17:181–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, William and Dennis W. Roncek. 1987a. “Industrialization and World Inequality: The Transformation of the Division of Labor in 59 Nations, 1960–1981.”American Sociological Review 52:359–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987b. “Labor Force Transformation among Seven Major Industrial Nations, 1920–1970.”Social Science Quarterly 68:326–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, Kenneth D., and Charles J. Andersen 1970.A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamblin, Don H. 1970. “Prestige and the Sociology Establishment.”The American Sociologist 51:154–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, David. 1970. “Prestige of Sociology Departments and the Placing of New Ph.D.’s.”The American Sociologist 5:157–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiff, Anthony. 1980. “Toward a Theory of Publishing or Perishing.”The American Sociologist 15:175–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1956.Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, Richard B. and Frank Clemente. 1973. “The Productivity of Graduates of 50 Sociology Departments.”The American Sociologist 8:169–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, David L. 1986. “The Assessment of Quality in Higher Education: A Critical Review of the Literature and Research.”Research in Higher Education 243:223–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, Ib and Erling Siring. 1983. “On the Causes and Effects of Nonresponse: Norwegian Experiences.” Pp. 25–59 inIncomplete Data in Sample Surveys. Volume III, edited by William G. Madow, Harold Nisselson, and Ingram Olkin. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, David S. 1983. “America’s Highest Ranked Graduate Schools, 1925–1982.”Change 15 (May–June):14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. “James McKeen Cattell and the Invention of Academic Quality Rating, 1903–1910.”The Review of Higher Education 8:107–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986.Academic Quality Rankings of American Colleges and Universities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhues, Kenneth. 1976. “Class and Organization as Paradigms in Social Science.”The American Sociologist 11 (February):38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Logan. 1979.American Academics: Then and Now. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William Julius. 1987.The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, Toshio, Mary R. Gillmore, and Karen S. Cook. 1988. “Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks.”American Journal of Sociology 93:833–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Forrest W. 1987.Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory, and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. William Rau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wilbert M. Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Address correspondence to Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, 61761-6901.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rau, W., Leonard, W.M. Evaluating Ph.D. sociology programs: Theoretical, methodological and policy implications. Am Soc 21, 232–256 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692424

Keywords

Search

Navigation