Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social control and the policing of terrorism: foundations for a sociology of counterterrorism

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sociologists have by and large neglected the study of terrorism and counterterrorism. The continued relevance that terrorism may be expected to have in our era should stimulate the development of new sociological ideas. I propose a sociological perspective of the policing of terrorism that is conceptually informed by a neo-Weberian bureaucratization theory of police. The theory holds that antiterrorist efforts at the level of police rest on a formal-rational conception of the means and objectives of counterterrorism, although ideological and political sentiments on terrorism are very intense and divisive within and across national states. Social control and counterterrorism are complex realities, comprised of a multitude of dimensions which are not necessarily in tune with one another. High-profile terrorist incidents, such as the events of 9/11, lead to attempts by national governments and international governing bodies to re-direct police efforts against terrorism in function of political objectives. Yet, because the bureaucratization of modern police institutions is at an unprecedented high level, the theory predicts, police agencies will resist these (re-)politicization attempts to continue counterterrorism activities that rest on an efficiency-driven treatment and depoliticized understanding of terrorism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, D. 2002. “From Civil Defence to Civil Protection and Back Again.”Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 11 (3): 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N.V. 2002. “The Law: The Impact of Antiterrorism Policies on Separation of Powers.”Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ed. 2002.International Terrorism: A Compilation of U.N. Documents, 1972-2001. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 2002. “The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited.”Theory, Culture, & Society 19 (4): 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Donald. 1998.The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. Revised edition. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. 2002. “The Imperial Presidency, the War on Terrorism, and the Revolutions of Modernity.”Constellations 9(1): 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 2002. “The ‘Fall of the Towers’ and International Order.”International Relations 16: 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, M. 2002. “Terrorism, the Use of Force, and International Law after 11 September.”International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2): 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, David L. 2003. “Law and Policy after 9/11: Implications of the USA PATRIOT Act and Related Legislation.”Police Forum 13 (3): 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.A. 2002. “Transparency after 9/11: Balancing the ‘Right-to-Know’ with the Need for Security.”Corporate Environmental Strategy 9 (4): 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stanley. 1985.Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, David. 2003. “The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism.”Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 38 (1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Dilip K., and Peter C. Kratcoski. 2003.Meeting the Challenges of Global Terrorism: Prevention, Control, and Recovery. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflem, Mathieu. 2002a.Policing World Society: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2002b. “Technology and the Internationalization of Policing: A Comparative-Historical Perspective.”Justice Quarterly 19 (3): 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2002c. “Law Enforcement 9/11: Questioning the Policing of International Terrorism,”Pro Bono, Newsletter of the SSSP Law & Society Division, 9(1): 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 2004.Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Volume 5. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2005. ’”Wild Beasts Without Nationality’: The Uncertain Origins of Interpol, 1898-1910.” Pp. 275–285 inThe Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, edited by Philip Reichel. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______. “Reading Terrorism and Terrorists.” Review essay.Theoretical Criminology, forthcoming.

  • —, and Lindsay C. Maybin. 2005. “Interpol and the Policing of International Terrorism: Developments and Dynamics since September 11.” InTerrorism: Research, Readings and Realities, edited by Lynne L. Snowden and Brad Whitsel. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Guzman, Melchor C. 2002. “The Changing Roles and Strategies of the Police in a Time of Terror.”ACJS Today 22 (3): 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer, Monica, and Jörg Monar. 2002. “11 September and the Challenge of Global Terrorism to the EU as a Security Actor.”Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2003.9/11 in American Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue L.K., and J.N. Kayyem. 2002. “Federalism and the Battle over Counterterrorist Law: State Sovereignty, Criminal Law Enforcement, and National Security.”Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 25 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Charles J. 1999. “The Police-ization of the Military.”Journal of Political and Military Sociology 27 (2): 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 2002. “Implications of the American Anti-Terrorism Coalition for Global Architectures.”European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1977[1975])Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraghty, Thomas. 2002. “The Criminal-Enemy Distinction: Prosecuting a Limited War against Terrorism Following the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks.”McGeorge Law Review 33: 551–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P. 1989. “Conceptualization of Terrorism.”American Sociological Review 54 (3): 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1961.Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Vincent E. 2002. “The Need for a Coordinated and Strategic Local Police Approach to Terrorism: A Practitioner’s Perspective.”Police Practice and Research 3 (4): 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, Philip B. 2001. “Dealing with Terrorism: An Overview.”International Security 26 (3): 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2003.Terrorism, Freedom, and Security: Common Sense for a Democratic Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, Martha K. 1987. “U.S.-Supported State Terror: A History of Police Training in Latin America.”Crime and Social Justice (27-28): 149-171.

  • Jenkins, Philip. 2003.Images of Terror: What We Can and Can’t Know about Terrorism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2000.Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapitän, Tomis, and Erich Schulte. 2002. “The Rhetoric of ‘Terrorism’ and Its Consequences.”Journal of Political and Military Sociology 30 (1): 172–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraska, Peter B., ed. 2001.Militarizing the American Criminal Justice System: The Changing Roles of the Armed Forces and the Police. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratcoski, Peter C, Edelbacher, Maximilian, and Dilip K. Das. 2002. “Terrorist Victimization: Prevention, Control and Recovery.”International Review ofVictimology 8 (3): 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 2003.No End to War: Terrorism in the 21st Century. New York; London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavranos, N. 2003. “Europol and the Fight against Terrorism.”European Foreign Affairs Review 8 (2): 259–275. Martin, Gus. 2003.Understanding Terrorism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. McVey, Philip M. 1997.Terrorism and Law Enforcement: A Multidimensional Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Murphy, S.D. 2003. “International Law, the United States, and the Non-Military ‘War’ against Terrorism.”European Journal of International Law 14 (2): 347-364. Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1993.Cops across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, S. 2003. “EU Responses to Terrorism.”International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Eric A. 2002. “Responses to the September 11 Attacks: Fear and the Regulatory Model of Counterterrorism.”Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 25: 681–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounder, Chris. 2002. “Anti-Terrorist Legislation: The Impact of the Processing of Data.”Computers and Security 21 (3): 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Roland. 1992.Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Louise I., and John T. Picarelli. 2002. “Methods Not Motives: Implications of the Convergence of International Organized Crime and Terrorism.”Police Practice and Research 3 (4): 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievert, R.J. 2003. “War on Terrorism or Global Law Enforcement Operation?”Notre Dame Law Review 78 (2): 307–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Prakash. 1998. “Terrorism, Human Rights, and Police in India.”Low Intensity Conflict and Law Enforcement 7 (2): 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brent L. 2002. “On Terrorism and Policing: Guest Editor’s Comments.”Police Practice and Research 3 (4): 275–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sociological Theory. 2004. Symposium on Terrorism.Sociological Theory 22 (1): 1–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, James P. 2003.Terrorism and International Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Jessica. 1999.The Ultimate Terrorists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travalio, Gregory M. 2000. “Terrorism, International Law, and the Use of Military Force.”Wisconsin International Law Journal 18: 145–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veness, David. 2001. “Terrorism and Counterterrorism: An International Perspective.”Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 24 (5): 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, Holly E., Miller, J. Mitchell, and Mathieu Deflem. “Govemmentality and the War on Terror: FBI Project Carnivore and the Diffusion of Disciplinary Power.”Critical Criminology, forthcoming.

  • Walker, Samuel. 1977.A Critical History of Police Reform: The Emergence of Professionalism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Gary R. 2002. “Sociology, Disasters, and Terrorism: Understanding Threats of the New Millennium.”Sociological Focus 35(l):87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber Max. (1918) 1988. “Parlament und Regierung im neugeordneten Deutschland: Zur politischen kritik des Beamtentums und Parteiwesens.” Pp. 306–443 in hisGesammelte Politische Schriften. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. (1922) 1980.Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Brent J. 1994. “The United States’ Response to International Terrorism.” Pp. 173–210 inThe Deadly Sin of Terrorism: Its Effect on Democracy and Civil Liberty in Six Countries, edited by D.A. Charters. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina, USA

    Mathieu Deflem (assistant professor of sociology)

Authors
  1. Mathieu Deflem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deflem, M. Social control and the policing of terrorism: foundations for a sociology of counterterrorism. Am Soc 35, 75–92 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692398

Keywords

Search

Navigation