Skip to main content
Log in

Was there a “golden past” for the introductory sociology textbook? A citation analysis of leading journals

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much debate over the years has centered around whether there was ever a “golden past” for the introductory sociology textbook, when high quality books influenced the development of scholarship and thinking. Some empirical evidence is added to this debate through an analysis of the citations to introductory sociology textbooks in all the articles and research notes appearing in theAmerican Journal of Sociology, theAmerican Sociological Review, andSocial Forces from 1960 to 1969 and from 1984 to 1993. The data show that, although seldom cited in recent journals, introductory sociology textbooks were often cited in the earlier period. The article concludes with some thoughts about why introductory sociology textbooks have had a declining influence on scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Michael P. 1990. “The Quality of Journals in Sociology Reconsidered: Objective Measures of Journal Influence.”ASA Footnotes 18(9):4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Paul J. 1988. “Sociology Textbooks: Managing Clones or Writing Works of Distinction.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. 1963.Invitation to Sociology. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, David M., and Lowell L. Hargens. 1991. “Are Sociologists’ Publications Uncited? Citation Rates of Journal Articles, Chapters, and Books.”The American Sociologist 22(2):147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, Leonard, and Philip Selznick. 1955.Sociology: A Text with Adapted Readings. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ruth Esther. 1976. “Introductory Texts: A Report on the Current Models.”Contemporary Sociology 5(2):123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Ellen G., and David P. Farrington. 1994a. “Who Are the Most-Cited Scholars in American Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals?”Journal of Criminal Justice 22(6):517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1994b. “Who Are the Most Influential Criminologists in the English-Speaking World?”British Journal of Criminology 34(2):204–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Jonathan R., and Stephen Cole. 1973.Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley. 1949.Human Society. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, D. Stanley. 1988. “Textbook Writing: Asymmetrics and Issues in the Publisher-Author Relationship.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):390–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabianic, David. 1991. “Declining Enrollments of Sociology Majors: Department Responses.”The American Sociologist 22(1):25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Ronald, Amos H. Hawley, Werner S. Landecker, and Horace M. Miner. 1952.Principles of Sociology: A Text with Readings. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, Sheryl. 1988. “Textbook Publishers and Academics: Reviewing the Relationship.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):353–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Norval D. 1971. “American Sociologists’ Evaluations of Sixty-three Journals.”The American Sociologist 6(4):298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, Erich. 1984.Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1988. “Sociology Textbooks: A Teaching Perspective.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin W., and Helen P. Gouldner. 1963.Modern Sociology: An Introduction to the Study of Human Interaction. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Franklin C. 1988. “Some Observations on Sociology Textbooks: An Editorial Perspective.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Elaine J. 1988. “One Week for Women? The Structure of Inclusion of Gender Issues in Introductory Textbooks.”Teaching Sociology 16(4):431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, A.H. 1951.The Claims of Sociology: A Critique of Textbooks. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Allan G. 1992.Human Arrangements: An Introduction to Sociology. 3d ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Harry M. 1960.Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, William. 1991.Sociology in a Changing World. 2d ed. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Alfred McClung, ed. 1946.New Outline of the Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard E. 1970.Human Societies: A Macrolevel Introduction to Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard E., and Jean Lenski. 1987.Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macionis, John J. 1988. “Textbooks and Sociology: A Case of Professional Dependency?”Teaching Sociology 16(4):420–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIver, Robert M. 1931.Society: A Textbook of Sociology. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K., Leonard Broom, and Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr., eds. 1959.Sociology Today: Problems and Prospects. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1943. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists.”American Journal of Sociology 49(2):165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert E., and Ernest Burgess. 1921.Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Ian. 1981.Sociology. 2d ed. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, Thomas, and David L. Smith. 1978. Frequency of Citations as Criterion for the Ranking of Departments, Journals, and Individuals.”Sociological Inquiry 48(1):49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1929. “Some Contrasts of Contemporary European and American Sociology: I.”Social Forces 8(1):57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thio, Alex. 1992.Sociology: An Introduction. 3d ed. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, Theodore C., ed. 1988. “Special Issue on Textbooks.”Teaching Sociology 16(4).

  • Ward, Lester. 1893.Dynamic Sociology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robin M., Jr. 1951.American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1960.American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. 2d ed. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1970.American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. 3d ed. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard A. 1993. “The Two Criminologies: The Divergent Worldviews of Textbooks and Journals.”The Criminologist 18(3):1, 8, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1994a. “Criminology Textbooks, 1918 to 1993: A Comprehensive Bibliography.”Journal of Criminal Justice Education 5(2):251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1994b. “The Effect of Editorial Appointments on the Citations of Sociology Journal Editors, 1970–1989.”The American Sociologist 25(2):40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1994c. “Is Bigger Necessarily Better? The Relative Advantages of Publishing Textbooks With Large and Small Presses.”The Criminologist 19(5):18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard A., and Kelly Carroll. 1994. “From Vanguard to Vanished: The Declining Influence of Criminology Textbooks on Scholarship.”Journal of Criminal Justice 22(6):559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard A., and Colette Soma. 1995. “The Declining Influence of Dissertations on Sociological Research.”ASA Footnotes 23(1):8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, R.A. Was there a “golden past” for the introductory sociology textbook? A citation analysis of leading journals. Am Soc 26, 41–48 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692354

Keywords

Navigation