Abstract
This study examines how Dorothy Swaine Thomas’s connection to the well-known “Thomas Theorem” is documented in introductory sociology texts. W.I. Thomas and Dorothy Swaine Thomas co-authoredThe Child in America (1928) in which the “theorem” first appears. However, it was not until the mid-1970s that Dorothy Swaine Thomas’s connection to these words begins to be cited in the books surveyed. The author suggests one reason for this pattern of neglect is a professional ideology that encouraged a process of genderization in sociology. It is only when women start to gain more visibility in the discipline that Dorothy Swain Thomas begins to be cited. The various ways the texts differ from the basic norms of citation are analyzed and discussed.
Sociology, being a social phenomenon, needs to be studied as one.
Everett Hughes (1958:157)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bain, Read. 1962. “The Most Important Sociologists?”American Sociological Review 27:746–748.
Barnes, Harry E. (ed.). 1948.An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barzun, Jacques and Henry F. Graff. 1970.The Modern Researcher. rev. ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Becker, Howard. 1945. “Interpretative Sociology and Constructive Typology.” Pp. 70–95 inTwentieth Century Sociology, edited by Georges Gurvitch and Wilbert E. Moore. New York: The Philosophical Library.
Bielby, Denise D. et al. 1994. “Support for the Nominations Process.”ASA Footnotes 22:8 (April).
Cole, Stephen. 1983. “The Hierarchy of the Sciences?”American Journal of Sociology 89:111–139.
Coser, Lewis A. 1978. “American Trends.” Pp. 287–320 inA History of Sociological Analysis, edited by Tom Bottomore and Robert Nisbet. London: Heinemann.
Daniels, Arlene Kaplan. 1973. “How Free Should Professions Be?” Pp. 39–57 inThe Professions and Their Prospects, edited by Eliot Freidson. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1981. “Early Women Sociologists and the American Sociological Society: Patterns of Exclusion and Participation.”The American Sociologist 16:14–24.
————— 1988a. “Transcending a Patriarchal Past: Teaching the History of Women in Sociology.”Teaching Sociology 16:141–150.
—————. 1988b.Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
—————. 1991.Women in Sociology: A Bio-bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.
Epstein, Cynthia F. 1970. “Encountering the Male Establishment: Sex-Status Limits on Women’s Careers in the Professions.”American Journal of Sociology 75:965–982.
Garfield, Eugene. 1983. “The Ethics of Scientific Publication: Authorship Attribution and Citation Amnesia.” Pp. 622–26 inEssays of an Information Scientist. Vol. 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
Geison, Gerald L. 1983. “Introduction.” Pp 3–11 inProfessions and Professional Ideologies in America, edited by Gerald L. Geison. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Gilbert, G. Nigel. 1977. “Referencing as Persuasion.”Social Studies of Science 7:113–22.
Goldberg, Philip. [1968] 1974. “Are Women Prejudiced Against Women?” Pp. 37–42 inAnd Jill Came Tumbling After. Sexism in American Education, edited by Judith Stacey, Susan Bereaud, and Joan Daniels. New York: Dell Publishing Co.
Gwartney, James D. and Richard Stroup, with A.H. Studenmund. 1983.Economics. Private and Public Choice. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press.
Habegger, Alfred. 1982.Gender, Fantasy, and Realism in American Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hall, Elaine J. 1988. “One Week for Women? The Structure of Inclusion of Gender Issues in Introductory Textbooks.”Teaching Sociology 16:431–42.
Hart, Hornell. 1927. “The History of Social Thought: A Consensus of American Opinion.”Social Forces 6:190–96.
Hearn, Jeff. 1982. “Notes on Patriarchy, Professionalization and the Semi-Professions.”Sociology 16:184–202.
Hiken, Andrew S. 1991. “Citation Challenges: Building Credibility for Threatening Ideas.”Teaching Sociology 19:502–05.
Hinkle, Roscoe C. 1980.Founding Theory of American Sociology, 1881–1915. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hughes, Everett C. 1958.Men and Their Work. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hughes, Helen MacGill. (ed.). 1973.The Status of Women in Sociology: 1968–1972. Washington, DC: The American Sociological Association.
Janowitz, Morris. 1966. “Introduction.” Pp. vii-lviii inW.I. Thomas On Social Organization and Social Personality, edited by Morris Janowitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—————. 1972. “Professionalization of Sociology.”American Journal of Sociology 78: 105–135.
Kaplan, Norman. 1965. “The Norms of Citation Behavior: Prolegomena to the Footnote.”American Documentation 16:179–184.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985.Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Larson, Margali Sarfatti. 1977.The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lee, Everett S. 1979. “Thomas, Dorothy S.” Pp. 763–65 inInternational Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Biographical Supplement, edited by David L. Sills. Vol. 18. New York: The Free Press.
Mansfield, Edwin. 1977.Principles of Macroeconomics. 2nd. ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
McCarthy, E. Doyle and Robin Das. 1985. “American Sociology’s Idea of Itself: A Review of the Textbook Literature From the Turn of the Century to the Present.”History of Sociology 5:21–43.
McHugh, Peter. 1968.Defining the Situation. The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Merton, Robert K. [1938] 1968. “Science and the Social Order.” Pp. 591–603 inSocial Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged ed. New York: The Free Press.
————— [1948] 1968. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Pp. 475–490 in Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged ed. New York: The Free Press.
————— [1968] 1973. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Pp. 439–459 inThe Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Norman W. Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mills, C. Wright. 1943. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists.”American Journal of Sociology 49:165–80.
Moed, H.F. and M. Vriens. 1989. “Possible Inaccuracies Occurring in Citation Analysis.”Journal of Information Science 15:95–107.
Oberschall, Anthony. 1972. “The Institutionalization of American Sociology.” Pp. 187–251 inThe Establishment of Empirical Sociology: Studies in Continuity, Discontinuity, and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, foreword by Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Harper and Row.
Odum, Howard W. 1951.American Sociology: The Story of Sociology in the United States through 1950. New York: Longmans, Green.
Oromaner, Mark J. 1968. “The Most Cited Sociologists: An Analysis of Introductory Text Citations.”The American Sociologist 3:124–26.
Pandit, Idrisa. 1993. “Citation Errors in Library Literature: A Study of Five Library Science Journals.”Library & Information Science Research 15:185–98.
Perrucci, Robert. 1980. “Sociology and the Introductory Textbook.”The American Sociologist 15:39–49.
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1989. “Teaching the History of Women in Sociology: Or Dorothy Swaine Thomas, Wasn’s She the Woman Married to William I.?”The American Sociologist 20:87–94.
Ritzer, George and David Walczak. 1986.Working: Conflict and Change. 3rd. ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Roby, Pamela A. 1992. “Women and the ASA: Degendering Organizational Structures and Processes, 1964–1974.”The American Sociologist 23:18–48.
Roscoe, Janice. 1991. “Dorothy Swaine Thomas (1899–1977).” Pp. 400–408 inWomen in Sociology: A Biobibliographical Sourcebook, edited by Mary Jo Deegan. New York: Greenwood Press.
Rose, Phyllis. 1983.Parallel Lives: Five Victorian Marriages. New York: Vintage Books.
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1994. “ASA’s Candidate Slate.”ASA Footnotes 22:8 (March).
Rudolph, Janell and Deborah Brackstone. 1990. “Too Many Scholars Ignore the Basic Rules of Documentation.”The Chronicle of Higher Education (April 11): A56.
Samuelson, Paul A. and William D. Nordhaus, with Michael J. Mandel. 1995.Macroeconomics. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Say, Jean Baptiste. [1803] 1824.A Treatise on Political Economy or, The Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Wealth. 2nd. American ed. trans. by C. R. Prinsep. Additional intro. and notes trans. by Clement C. Biddle. Boston: Wells and Lilly.
Schutz, Alfred. [1955] 1962. “Symbol, Reality, and Society.” Pp. 287–356 inThe Problem of Social Reality, Collected papers 1, edited by Maurice Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sills, David L. and Robert K. Merton. (eds.). 1991.International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Social Science Quotations, Vol. 19. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Simpson, Ida Harper and Richard L. Simpson. 1994. “The Transformation of the American Sociological Association.”Sociological Forum 9:259–278.
Sweetland, James H. 1989. “Errors in Bibliographic Citations: A Continuing Problem.”Library Quarterly 59:291–304.
Theodore, Athena. 1971. “The Professional Woman: Trends and Prospects.” Pp. 1–38 inThe Professional Woman, edited by Athena Theodore. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co.
Thomas, Dorothy Swaine. 1952. “Experiences in Interdisciplinary Research.”American Sociological Review 17:663–669.
—————. 1970. “Contribution to the Herman Wold Festschrift.” Pp. 216–227 inScientists at Work. Festschrift in Honour of Herman Wold, edited by Tore Dalenius, Georg Karlsson, and Sten Malmquist. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Thomas, W.I. [1923] 1967.The Unadjusted Girl. With Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis, edited with foreword by Benjamin Nelson. Intro. by Michael Parenti. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
—————. [1931] 1966. “The Relation of Research to the Social Process.” Pp. 289–305 inOn Social Organization and Social Personality, edited with intro. by Morris Janowitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—————. 1966.On Social Organization and Social Personality, edited with intro. by Morris Janowitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas W.I. and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1928.The Child in America. Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Thomas, W.I. and Florian Znaniecki. [1918] 1927.The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Volume One. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Vidich, Arthur J. and Stanford M. Lyman. 1985.American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religion and Their Directions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Volkart, Edmund H. (ed.). 1951.Social Behavior and Personality. Contributions of W.I. Thomas to Theory and Social Research. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Wilkinson, Doris. 1979. “A Report: Status of Women in Sociology, 1934–1977.”ASA Footnotes 7:4–6 (March).
Znaniecki, Florian. 1963.Cultural Sciences: Their Origin and Development. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. “Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science.” Pp. 87–138 inDeviance and Social Change, edited by Edward Sagarin. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R.S. Giving credit where credit is due: Dorothy Swaine Thomas and the “Thomas Theorem”. Am Soc 26, 9–28 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692352
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692352