Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of call duration in howler monkeys

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “loud” calls of forest primates consist of repeated sounds that elicit a response from other members of the species. Recent studies suggest that these calls are often displays by the males that permit them to assess the strength of their opponents. Previous research on red howler monkeys supported the hypothesis that howling functions in assessment of competing individuals, as an alternative to energetically expensive chases and fights. As the second step in the attempt to understand the evolution of howling in genus Alouatta,one aspect—call duration — was compared in two species,the mantled howler (Alouatta palliata)and the red howler (A. seniculus).In A. palliatathe median howl duration was 3.5 sec and the interhowl interval was 20.0 sec, while in A. seniculusthe median howl duration was 19.0 sec and the interhowl interval was 3.0 sec. During the dawn chorus, the total duration of calling in A. seniculusmay be 10 or more times greater than that in A. palliata.The latter species appears to be limited in the duration of howls it can produce, so it increases the amount of calling by reducing the interhowl interval. At least four factors may be important in the evolution of the observed differences in call structure: constraints of the acoustic environment, alternate forms of display used by A. palliata,the presence or absence of competing males within the troop, and the effect of female calls on male howling. The observations suggest that the use of the male loud call may reflect differences in the nature of male-male competition and female support more than it reflects the constraints of the acoustic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, C., and Kummer, H. (1980). Male assessment of female choice in Hamadryas baboons.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6: 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. D., and Baldwin, J. I. (1976). Vocalizations of howler monkeys (A. palliata) in southwestern Panama.Folia primatol. 26: 81–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. W. (1982). Primate vocalizations. Structural and functional approaches to understanding.Behaviour 80: 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivers, D. J. (1969). On the daily behaviour and spacing of howling monkey groups.Folia primatol. 10: 48–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Albon, S. D. (1979). The roaring in red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement.Behaviour 69: 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, C. M., and Sekulic, R. (1982). Infanticide in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide in Animals and Man, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, J. W., Thorington, R. W., Jr., and Otis, J. S. (1981). The demography of howler monkeys’ (Alouatta palliata) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Int. J. Primatol. 2: 207–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., Knight, D. H., and Gaulin, C. K. (1980). Local variance inAlouatta group size and food availability on Barro Colorado Island.Biotropica 12: 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimoff, E. H. (1983).The Organisation and Sound Production of the Song of the Gibbons: With Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Implications, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1949). Mammals of northern Colombia. Preliminary report No. 4: Monkeys (Primates), with taxonomic revisions of some forms.Proc. U.S. Nat. Hist. Mus. 98: 323–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B., (1977).The Langurs of Abu, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, M., and Leighton, D. R. (1982). The relationship of size of feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding inTrichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island.Biotropica 14: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1980).The Foraging Strategy of Howler Monkeys, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, J. F., and Trocco, T. F. (1983). Taxonomy and phylogeny of black-and-white colobus monkeys: Inferences from an analysis of loud-call variation.Folia primatol. 40: 83–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, C., and Pusey, A. (1979). Female aggression and male membership in troops of Japanese macaques and olive baboons.Folia primatol. 31: 212–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sekulic, R. (1982a). The function of howling in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus).Behaviour 81: 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekulic, R. (1982b). Behaviour and ranging patterns of a solitary female red howler (Alouatta seniculus).Folia primatol. 38: 217–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sekulic, R. (1983a). Male relationships and infant deaths in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus).Z. Tierpsychol. 61: 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekulic, R. (1983b). The effect of female call on male howling in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus).Int. J. Primatol. 4: 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, S. C. (1982). Agonistic dominance in male baboons: An alternate view.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. M. (1983). The evolution of male loud calls among mangabeys and baboons. In Snowdon, C. T., Brown, C. H., and Petersen, M. R. (eds.),Primate Communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sekulic, R., Chivers, D.J. The significance of call duration in howler monkeys. Int J Primatol 7, 183–190 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692317

Key words

Navigation