Skip to main content

A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management

Estuaries volume 25, pages 1246–1261 (2002)Cite this article

“Water may flow in a thousand channels, but it all returns to the sea.”—African proverb

Abstract

As humans continue to influence the quantity, timing, and quality of freshwater input to estuaries, it is becoming increasingly common for policies to be enacted that mandate the establishment of freshwater inflow criteria that will serve to preserve and protect estuarine ecosystems. This paper reviews the scientific literature describing how changes in freshwater inflow affect estuaries, proposes a conceptual model that explores the roles of scientists, citizens, politicians, and managers in the management of freshwater inflow to estuaries, and uses the model to explore the ways in which freshwater inflow is managed in a variety of estuaries. The scientific review is organized to provide an overview of the connections between freshwater inflow (in terms of the quantity, quality, and timing of water delivery), estuarine conditions (such as salinity and concentrations of dissolved and particulate material), and estuarine resources (such as the distribution and abundance of organisms), and to highlight our understanding of the causative mechanisms that underlie the relationships among these variables. The premise of the conceptual model is that the goal of estuarine freshwater inflow policy is to protect those resources and functions that we as a society value in estuaries, and that management measures use scientific information about the relationships among inflow, conditions, and resources to establish inflow standards that can meet this goal. The management approach can be inflow-based (flow is kept within some prescribed bounds under the assumption that taking too much away is bad for the resources), condition-based (inflow standards are set in order to maintain specified conditions in the estuary), or resource-based (inflow standards are set based on the requirements of specific resources), but each of these is carried out by regulating inflow. This model is used as a framework to describe the development of freshwater inflow criteria for estuaries in Texas, Florida, and California.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Literature Cited

  • Alber, M. andJ. E. Sheldon. 1999. Use of a date-specific method to examine variability in the flushing times of Georgia estuaries.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49:469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleem, A. A.. 1972. Effect of river outflow management on marine life.Marine Biology 15:200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardisson, P.-L. andE. Bourget. 1997. A study of the relationship between freshwater runoff and benthic abundance: A scale-oriented approach.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45:535–545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, R. J., C.-E. M. Neville, B. L. Thomson, P. J. Harrison, andM. St. John. 1994. A relationship between Fraser River discharge and interannual production of Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) in the Strait of Georgia.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51:2843–2855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, N. M. 1980. Land into Water—Water into Land. University Presses of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D., A. Mehta, J. Morris, W. Nuttle, C. Simenstad andD. Swift. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana.Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 20:1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, M. J. andR. L. Iverson. 1978. Estuarine and plume fronts, p. 87–104.In M. J. Bowman and W. E. Esaias (eds.). Oceanic Fronts in Coastal Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summers andW. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries 18:285–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J. A.. 1985. Relationship between pink shrimp production on the Tortugas grounds and water flow patterns in the Florida Everglades.Bulletin of Marine Science 37:839–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, A. J., B. P. Hayden, M. E. Monaco, D. M. Nelson, andM. G. McCormick-Ray. 1993. Biologically-based estuarine salinity zones derived from a multivariate analysis.Estuaries 16: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castleberry, D. T., J. J. Cech, Jr.,D. C. Erman, D. Hankin, M. Healey, G. M. Kondolf, M. Mangel, M. Mohr, P. B. Moyle, J. Nielsen, T. P. Speed, andJ. G. Williams. 1996. Uncertainty and instream flow standards.Fisheries 21:20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, R. H. andP. H. Doering. 1998. Preliminary estimate of optimum freshwater inflow to the Caloosahatchee estuary: A resource-based approach.In Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium. Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N. L., A. M. Bartuska, J. H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J. F. Franklin, J. A. MacMahon, R. F. Noss, D. J. Parsons, C. H. Peterson, M. G. Turner, andR. G. Woodmansee. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management.Ecological Applications 6:665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C. 1986. Sustainable development of the biosphere: Themes for a research program, p. 5–48.In W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn (eds.). Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. 1984. Temporal dynamics and ecological significance of salinity stratification in an estuary (South San Francisco Bay, USA).Oceanologica Acta 7:137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E., A. E. Alpine, B. E. Cole, R. L. J. Wong, J. F. Arthur, andM. D. Ball. 1983. River discharge controls phytoplankton dynamics in the Northern San Francisco Bay estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 16:415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. J. 1966. Effects of decreased river flow on estuarine ecology.Estuarine Ecology 38:1831–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Jr.,J. W., C. J. Madden, R. R. Twilley, R. F. Shaw, B. A. McKee, M. J. Dagg, D. L. Childers, R. C. Raynie, andL. J. Rouse. 1994. The influence of Atchafalaya River discharge on Fourleague Bay, Louisiana (USA), p. 151–160.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmann, E. H. 2001. Effect of water residence time on annual export and denitrification of nitrogen in estuaries: A model analysis.Estuaries 24:481–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, P. H., R. H. Chamberlain andD. E. Haunert. 2002. Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida.Estuaries 25:1343–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, K. F. andK. T., Frank. 1994. Effects of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates.Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 4:135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M. andC. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.Science 266:753–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farb, P. 1965. Disaster threatens the Everglades.Audubon Magazine Sept.–Oct.

  • Flannery, M. S., E. B. Peebles andR. T. Montgomery. 2002. A percentage-of-streamflow approach for managing reductions of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries.Estuaries 25:1318–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R. W.. 1985. Long-term estuarine variability and associated biological response.Estuaries 8:158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R. W., G. L. Powell andR. D. Kalke. 1986. Ecological effects from the balance between new and recycled nitrogen in Texas coastal waters.Estuaries 9:284–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo-Bect, M. S., E. P. Glenn, H. M. Page, K. Fitzsimmons, L. A. Galindo-Bect, J. M. Hernandex-Ayon, R. L. Petty, J. Garcia-Hernandez, andD. Moore. 2000. Penaeid shrimp landings in the upper Gulf of California in relation to Colorado River freshwater discharge.Fisheries Bulletin 98:222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammelsrød, T.. 1992. Variation in shrimp abundance on the Sofala Bank, Mozambique, and its relation to the Zambezi River runoff.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, A., G. Walkerden andJ. Scandol. 1999. Adaptive management of the water cycle on the urban fringe: Three Australian case studies.Conservation Ecology 3(1):11. [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol3/issl/artll.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, A.. 1991. Spawning stock-recruitment relationships of white shrimp in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grange, N., A. K. Whitfield, C. J. De Villiers, andB. R. Allanson. 2000. The response of two South African east coast estuaries to altered river flow regimes.Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 10:155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. N. 2000. Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest: A case study from coastal Oregon.Conservation Ecology 4(2):6 [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallim, Y.. 1991. The impact of human alterations of the hydrological cycle on ocean margins, p. 301–327.In R. F. C. Mantoura, J.-M. Martin, and R. Wollast (eds.). Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D.. 1960. Biotic changes in a bay associated with the end of a drought.Limnology and Oceanography 5:326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D.. 1967. Effect of higher than normal salinities on salt marshes.Contributions in Marine Science 12:249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S.. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W.. 1998. An assessment of human influences on fluxes of nitrogen from the terrestrial landscape to the estuaries and continental shelves of the North Atlantic Ocean.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 52:213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R.W., D. P. Swaney, T. J. Butler andR. Marino. 2000. Climatic control on eutrophication of the Hudson River estuary.Ecosystems 3:210–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incze, L. S., L. M. Mayer, E. B. Sherr andS. A. Macko. 1982. Carbon inputs to bivalve mollusks: A comparison of two estuaries.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39: 1348–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. G., L. Legendre, Y. Simard, andS. Leparge. 1985. Phytoplankton response to freshwater runoff: The diversion of the Eastmain River, James Bay.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 42:1216–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittekkot, V., C. Humborg andP. Schäfer. 2000. Hydrological alterations and marine biogeochemistry: A silicate issue?BioScience 50:776–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassby, A. D., W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Arbor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, J. R. Schubel, andT. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations.Ecological Applications 5:272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. L.. 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies.Conservation Ecology 3(2):8. [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. E., D. L. Correll, J. Miklas andD. E. Weller. 1991. Long-term trends in estuarine nutrients and chlorophyll, and short-term effects of variation in watershed discharge.Marine Ecology Progress Series 75:121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W. J.. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco estuary.Estuaries 25:1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W. J. andJ. R. Schubel. 1994. Managing freshwater flows into San Francisco Bay using a salinity standard: Results of a workshop, p. 411–416.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.). Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, P. W.. 1992. Environmental factors associated with longterm changes in chlorophyll concentration in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta and Suisun Bay, California.Estuaries 15: 335–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Light, S. S., L. H. Gunderson andC. S. Holling. 1995. The Everglades: Evolution of management in a turbulent ecosystem, p. 103–168.In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light (eds.). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. J.. 1997. Trophic response of estuarine fishes to long-term changes of river runoff.Bulletin of Marine Science 60: 984–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. J., X. Niu, F. G. Lewis, andG. C. Woodsum. 1997. Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: Long-term control of trophic organization.Ecological Applications 7:277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W. L., (ed.) 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., H. W. Paerl, J. Rudek andP. W. Bates. 1993. Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow.Marine Ecology Progress Series 93:199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. C., L. H. Crocker, S. E. Pike, andB. W. Wendler. 1988. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 48:235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, J., G. Powell andD. Brock. 1994. Freshwater-inflow need of estuary computed by Texas estuarine MP model.Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 120:693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, R.. 2002. A resource-based framework for establishing freshwater inflow requirements for the Suwannee River estuary.Estuaries 25:1333–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, C. C., J. A. Ley andR. D. Bjork. 1994. Changes in freshwater inflow from the Everglades to Florida Bay including effects on biota and biotic processes: A review, p. 117–146.In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.). Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, C. L. andJ. A. Ley. 1993. A possible effect of salinity fluctuation on abundance of benthic vegetation and associated fauna in northeastern Florida Bay.Estuaries 16:703–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mousset, M. B., J. P. Croue, E. Lefebvre andB. Legube. 1997. Distribution and characterization of dissolved organic matter of surface waters.Water Research 31:541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1990. Managing Troubled Waters: The Role of Environmental Monitoring. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W. 1992. Quantifying the relationship between nitrogen input and the productivity of marine ecosystems.Proceedings Advances in Marine Technology Conference 5:57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W., J. W. Ammerman, L. P. Atkinson, V. M. Verounsky, G. Billen, W. C. Boicourt, W. R. Boynton, T. M. Church, D. M. DiToro, R. Elmgren, J. H. Garber, A. E. Giblin, R. A. Jahnke, N. J. P. Owens, M. E. Q. Pilson, andS. P. Seitzinger. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean.Biogeochemistry 35:141–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA). 1995. Performance review of the consumptive use permitting program administered by the Department of Environmental Protection and the Water Management Districts. Report No. 94-34. The Florida Legislature Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. Tallahassee, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. E. andC. H. Hershner. 1999. Temporal changes in the vegetation pattern in a tidal freshwater marsh.Wetlands 19:90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumstead, E. E. 1990. Changes in ichthyofaunal diversity and abundance within the Mbashe estuary, Transkei, following construction of a river barrage.South African Journal of Marine Science 9:399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, andJ. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime.BioScience 47:769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. L. 1998. Water for food production: Will there be enough in 2025?BioScience 48:629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. L., J. Matsumoto, andD. A. Brock. 2002. Methods for determining minimum freshwater inflow needs of Texas bays and estuaries.Estuaries 25:1262–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. L. andJ. Matsumoto. 1994. Texas Estuarine Mathematical Programming Model: A tool for freshwater inflow management, p. 401–406.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.). Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N. W., C. M. Breen, A. K. Whitfield, andJ. W. Hearne. 1999. An index for the management of South African estuaries for juvenile fish recruitment from the marine environment.Fisheries Management and Ecology 6:421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N., W. J. Wiseman, Jr.,R. E. Turner, D. Justíc, B. K. Sen Gupta, andQ. Dortch. 1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf.Estuaries 19:386–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddering, J. S. V. 1988. Prediction of the effects of reduced river discharge on the estuaries of the south-eastern Cape Province.South African journal of Science 84:726–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wigington, andD. P. Braun. 1997. How much water does a river need?Freshwater Biology 37:231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riera, P. andP. Richard. 1996. Isotopic determination of food sources ofCrassostrea gigas along a trophic gradient in the estuarine bay of Marennes-Oléron.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42:347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulifson, R. A. andC. S. Manooch, III. 1990. Recruitment of juvenile striped bass in the Roanoke River, North Carolina, as related to reservoir discharge.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10:397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuyler, A. E., S. S. Andersen, andV. J. Kolaga. 1993. Plant zonation in the tidal portion of the Delaware River.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144:263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, J. E. andM. Alber. 2002. Residence times in the Altamaha River estuary.Estuaries 25:1304–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, F. H. andJ. A. Browder. 1998. Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico.Environmental Management 22:547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skreslet, S. 1986. Freshwater outflow in relation to space and time dimensions of complex ecological interactions in coastal waters, p. 3–12.In S. Skreslet (ed.). The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. B. 2001. Analysis of historic vegetation changes in two Georgia estuaries using aerial photography and GIS. M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solis, R. S. andG. L. Powell. 1999. Hydrography, mixing characteristics, and residence times of Gulf of Mexico estuaries, p. 29–71.In T. S. Bianchi, J. R. Pennock, and R. R. Twilley (eds.), Biogeochemistry of Gulf of Mexico Estuaries. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2001. Draft Minimum flows and levels for the Loxahatchee River and estuary, May 22, 2001 Draft. South Florida Water Management District Water Supply Division, West Palm Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). 1998. Water use permit information manual including chapter 40D-2, Florida Administration Code: Basis of review for water use permit applications and design aids. Southwest Florida Water Management District. Brooksville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. E. 1992. Risks of altering the hydrologic regime of large rivers, p. 119–152.In J. Cairns, Jr., B. R. Niederlehner, and D. R. Orvos (eds.), Predicting Ecosystem Risk. Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E. andL. W. Miller. 1983. Effects of river flow on abundance of young Chinook Salmon, American Shad, Longfin Smelt, and Delta Smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3: 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, Jr.,W. H. 1973. Correlations between seasonal river discharge and local landings of American lobster (Homarus americanus) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.Journal Fisheries Research Board Canada 30:856–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, Jr.,W. H., R. H. Loucks, K. F. Drinkwater, andA. R. Coote. 1983. Nutrient flux onto the Labrador Shelf from Hudson Strait and its biological consequences.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 40:1692–1701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S. A., J. T. LuongVan, andK. T. Boland. 1996. Retention time as a primary determinant of colour and light attenuation in two tropical Australian reservoirs.Freshwater Biology 36:57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy, W. S. 1993. Characterizing the San Francisco estuary: A case study of science management in the National Estuary Program.Coastal Management 21:113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. 1992. Coastal wetlands and penaeid shrimp habitat, p. 97–104.In R. H. Stroud (ed.), Marine Recreational Fisheries 14. National Coalition for Marine Conservation. Savannah, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustach, J. F., W. W. Kirby-Smith, andR. T. Barber. 1986. Effect of watershed modification on a small coastal plain estuary, p. 177–192.In D. A. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Winkle, W., C. C. Coutant, H. I. Jager, J. S. Mattice, D. J. Orth, R. G. Otto, S. F. Railsback, andM. J. Sale. 1997. Uncertainty and instream flow standards: Perspectives based on hydropower research and assessment.Fisheries 22:21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty, C. J. andD. Sahagian. 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle.BioScience 50:753–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems.Conservation Ecology 1(2):1. [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org./vol1/iss2/art1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. andC. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing.Ecology 71:2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. J. andW. S. Perret. 1974. Short term effects of the Toledo Bend project on Sabine Lake, Louisiana, p. 710–721.In A. L. Mitchell (ed.), Proceedings, 27th Annual Conference. Southeast Association Game and Fish Committees, Hot Springs, Arkansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. K. 1994. Abundance of larval and 0+ juvenile marine fishes in the lower reaches of three southern African estuaries with differing freshwater inputs.Marine Ecology Progress Series 105:257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. K. andM. N. Bruton. 1989. Some biological implications of reduced fresh water inflow into eastern Cape estuaries: A preliminary assessment.South African Journal of Science 85:691–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. K. andT. H. Woolridge. 1994. Changes in freshwater supplies to southern African estuaries: Some theoretical and practical considerations, p. 41–50.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg. Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Sources of Unpublished materials

  • Calfed. 2002. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. http://calfed. water.ca.gov/general/overview.html.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1995 NEP Monitoring Guidance. EPA 842-B-92-004. http://www.epa.gov/ owow/estuaries/guidance.

  • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). 2002. Texas Water Development Board http://hyper20.twdb.state.tx.us/data/ bays_estuaries/b_nEpage.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, Georgia

    Merryl Alber

Authors
  1. Merryl Alber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merryl Alber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alber, M. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries 25, 1246–1261 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692222

Keywords

  • Conceptual Model
  • Particulate Material
  • Management Measure
  • Freshwater Input
  • Freshwater Inflow