Abstract
Many sociologists have suggested that the dominant paradigm in sociology ignores the environment, which accounts for the fact that environmental sociology is poorly represented in sociology’s mainstream journals. The purpose of this article is to test this assumption empirically by examining the coverage of environmental sociology in nine mainstream sociology journals from 1969 through 1994. The nine journals are separated into two tiers, representing higher and lower prestige journals. Each environmental article is categorized by its area (attitudes and behaviors, environmental movement, political economy, risk, and “new human ecology”) and whether it involves “sociology of the environmental issues” (the application of standard sociological perspectives to environmental issues) or “core environmental sociology” (the examination of societal-environmental relationships). We find that less than two percent of all articles published in the sampled journals in the twenty-five-year period of study were environmental, and that the higher tier journals were less likely to publish environmental articles than were the lower tier journals. Environmental articles were more likely to be part of “core environmental sociology” after 1981 than they were “sociology of the environmental issues,” which suggests a greater recognition among both environmental sociologists and journal reviewers that human societies are ecosystem-dependent. The number of environmental articles increased in the 1990s, portending a fruitful period for sociologists specializing on the environment. We argue that the broader field of sociology can benefit by recognizing the linkages environmental sociology has to other sociological specializations and that, ultimately, sociology needs to be able to address environmental variables in order to understand society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Michael Patrick. 1990. “The ‘Quality’ of Journals in Sociology Reconsidered: Objective Measures of Journal Influence.”Footnotes (November) 18:5.
Benford, Robert D. 1992. “Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power.”Sociological Inquiry 62(1):36–55.
——— 1993. “Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement.”Social Forces 71(3):677–701.
Benford, Robert D., Helen A. Moore, and J. Allen Williams, Jr. 1993. “In Whose Backyard?: Concern About Siting a Nuclear Waste Facility.”Sociological Inquiry 63(1):30–48.
Benton, Ted. 1989. “Marxism and Natural Limits: An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction.”New Left Review (November/December):51–86.
——— 1991. “Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should Be Given A (Cautious) Welcome.”Sociology 25:1–29.
Bockman, Shel. 1991. “Interest, Ideology, and Claims-Making Activity.”Sociological Inquiry 61(4):452–470.
Bogard, William C. 1988. “Bringing Social Theory to Hazards Research.”Sociological Perspectives 31(2):147–168.
Buttel, Frederick H. 1987. “New Directions in Environmental Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology 13:465–468.
Cable, Sherry and Michael Benson. 1993. “Acting Locally: Environmental Injustice and the Emergence of Grass-Roots Environmental Organizations.”Social Problems 40(4):464–477.
Cable, Sherry and Charles Cable. 1995.Environmental Problems: Grassroots Solutions: The Politics of Grassroots Environmental Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Catton, William R., Jr. 1971. “The Wildland Recreation Boom and Sociology.”Pacific Sociological Review 14:339–359.
———, Jr. 1972. “Sociology in an Age of Fifth Wheels.”Social Forces 50:436–447.
———, Jr. 1980. “Need for a New Paradigm.”Sociological Perspectives 26:3–16.
———, Jr. 1984. “Probable Collective Responses to Ecological Scarcity: How Violent?”Sociological Perspectives 27:3–20.
———, Jr. 1986. “Homo Colossus and the Technical Turn-Around.”Sociological Spectrum 6:121–147.
———, Jr. 1994. “Foundations of Human Ecology.”Sociological Perspectives 37(1):75–79.
Catton, William R., Jr. and Riley E. Dunlap. 1978. “Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm.”The American Sociologist 13:41–49.
———. 1980. “A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology.”American Behavioral Scientist 24:15–47.
Clarke, Lee. 1988. “Explaining Choices Among Technological Risks.”Social Problems 35(1):22–35.
Cosby, Arthur G. 1994. “1993 MSSA Presidential Address: Futurism and Methodology in the Social Sciences.”Sociological Spectrum 14(3): 193–204.
Derksen, Linda and John G. Gartrell. 1993. “The Social Context of Recycling.”American Sociological Review 58 (June):434–442.
Dickens, Peter. 1992.Society and Nature: Towards A Green Social Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
———. 1993. “Society and Nature.” Pp 141–166 inDevelopments In Sociology: An Annual Review, vol. 9, edited by M. Haralambos. Ormskirk, England: Causeway Press.
Dietz, Thomas. 1988. “Towards a Human Ecology of Industrial Societies: Some Comments on Theory and the State of Environmental Sociology.”Environment, Technology and Society (Spring) 52: 2–3.
Dunlap, Riley E. 1980. “Paradigmatic Change in Social Science: From Human Exemptions to an Ecological Paradigm.”American Behavioral Scientist 24:5–13.
Dunlap, Riley E. and William R. Catton, Jr. 1979. “Environmental Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology 5: 243–273.
———, Jr. 1983. “What Environmental Sociologists Have in Common (whether concerned with built or natural Environments).”Sociological Inquiry (Spring) 53: 131–135.
———, Jr. 1994a. “Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalization of Environmental Sociology.”American Sociologist 25(1): 5–29.
———, Jr. 1994b. “Toward an Ecological Sociology: The Development, Current Status, and Probable Future of Environmental Sociology.” Pp. 11–31 in William V. D’Antonio, Masamichi Sasaki, and Yoshio Yonebayashi (eds.) inEcology, Society and the Quality of Social Life. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Dunlap, Riley E. and Angela G. Mertig (eds.) 1992.American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990. Washington D.C.: Taylor and Francis.
Durkheim, Emile. 1950.The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
Erikson, Kai. 1994.A New Species of Trouble. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Field, Donald R. and William R. Burch, Jr. 1988.Rural Sociology and the Environment. New York: Greenwood Press.
Field, Donald R. and Darryll R. Johnson. 1986. “Rural Communities and Natural Resources: A Classical Interest.”The Rural Sociologist 6(3): 187–196.
Freudenburg, William R. 1993. “Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions.”Social Forces 71(4):909–932.
Freudenburg, William R. and Scott Frickel. 1994. “Digging Deeper: Mining-Dependent Regions in Historical Perspective.”Rural Sociology 59(2): 266–288.
Freudenburg, William R., Scott Frickel and Robert Gramling. 1995. “The Sociocultural Definition of Natural Resources: Learning to Think About A Mountain.”Sociological Forum 10(3):361–392.
Freudenburg, William R. and Robert Gramling. 1989. “The Emergence of Environmental Sociology: Contributions of Riley E. Dunlap and William R. Catton, Jr.”Sociological Inquiry 59(4): 439–452.
———. 1994a. “Mid-Range Theory and Cutting-Edge Sociology: A Call for Cumulation.”Environment, Technology and Society (Summer) 76:1, 3–6.
———. 1994b.Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle Over Offshore Oil Drilling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Freudenburg, William R. and Timothy R. Jones. 1991. “Attitudes and Stress in the Presence of Technological Risk: A Test of the Supreme Court Hypothesis.”Social Forces 69(4): 1143–1168.
Frey, James. 1993. “Risk Perceptions Associated with a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository.”Sociological Spectrum 13(1): 139–151.
Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructivist Approach.”American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.
Gould, Kenneth. 1993. “Pollution and Perception: Social Visibility and Local Environmental Mobilization.”Qualitative Sociology 16(2): 157–178.
———. 1991. “The Sweet Smell of Money: Economic Dependency and Local Environmental Political Mobilization.”Society and Natural Resources 4: 133–150.
Heberlein, T. and J. Black. 1981. “Cognitive Consistency and Environmental Action.”Environment and Behavior 13: 717–734.
Howrey, Carla B. (compiled by) 1992.Publishing Options: An Author’s Guide to Journals. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association.
Huber, Bettina J. (compiled by) 1982.Publishing Options: An Author’s Guide to Journals. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association.
Humphrey, Craig R. and Frederick H. Buttel. 1982.Environment, Energy, and Society: An Eco-Sociological Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Jones, Alwyn. 1987. “The Violence of Materialism in Advanced Industrial Society: An Eco-Sociological Approach.”British Journal of Sociology 35:19–47.
———. 1990. “Social Symbiosis: A Gaian Critique of Contemporary Social Theory.”The Ecologist 20: 108–113.
Kloppenburg, Jack. 1991. “Social Theory and the De/Reconstruction of Agricultural Science: Local Knowledge for an Alternative Agriculture.”Rural Sociology 56(4): 519–548.
Kroll-Smith, Steve and Stephen Robert Couch. 1991. “Technological Hazards, Adaption and Social Change.” Pp 293–319 inCommunities at Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards. Edited by Stephen R. Couch and J. Stephen Kroll-Smith. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Kroll-Smith, Steve and Shirley Laska. 1994. “The GEC Debate: Notes on Theorizing and Researching the Environment; or Where Is Our Newton?”Environment, Technology and Society 74:1, 3.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laska, Shirley Bradway. 1993. “Environmental Sociology and the State of the Discipline.”Social Forces 72:1–17.
Liebow, Edward, Kristi Branch, Caryln Orians. 1993. “Perceptions of Hazardous Waste Incineration Risks: Focus Group Findings.”Sociological Spectrum 13(1): 153–173.
Luloff, A.E. and William A. Befort. 1989. “Land Use Change and Aerial Photography: Lessons for Applied Sociology.”Rural Sociology 54(1): 92–105.
Lutzenhiser, Loren and Bruce Hackett. 1993. “Social Stratification and Environmental Degradation: Understanding Household CO2 Production.”Social Problems 40(1): 50–73.
Mazur, Allan and Glenn S. Hall. 1990. “Effects of Social Influences and Measured Exposure Level of Response to Radon.”Sociological Inquiry 60(3): 274–284.
Mileti, Dennis S. and Paul W. O’Brien. 1992. “Warnings During Disaster: Normalizing Communicated Risk.”Social Problems 39(1):40–57.
Molotch, Harvey. 1970. “Oil in Santa Barbara and Power in America.”Sociological Inquiry 40:131–144.
Murdock, Steve H., Kenneth Backman, Sean-Shong Hwang, and Rita R. Hamm. 1991. “International Dimensions of Post-1980 Internal Migration in the United States: The Role of Sustenance Specialization and Dominance.”Rural Sociology 61(4):419–505.
Perrolle, Judith A. 1993. “Comments from the Special Issues Editor: The Emerging Dialogue on Environmental Justice.”Social Problems 40(1):1–4.
Picou, Steve and Donald D. Rosebrook. 1993. “Technological Accident, Community Class Action Litigation, and Scientific Damage Assessment: A Case Study of Court-Ordered Research.”Sociological Spectrum 13:117–138
Rhyne, Edwin. 1987. “Making Environmental Sociology Environmental.”Sociological Spectrum 7:335–346.
Ritzer, George. 1975. “The Paradigmatic Status of Sociology” inSociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Roberts, J. Timmons. 1993. “Psychosocial Effects of Workplace Hazardous Exposures: Theoretical Synthesis and Preliminary Findings.”Social Problems 40(1):74–87.
Rogers, Denise M. and Ann M. Vandeman. 1993. “Women as Farm Landlord: Does Gender Affect Environmental Decision-Making on Leased Land?”Rural Sociology 58(4): 560–568.
Satterfield, Douglas R. 1983. “A Change in Academic Environmental Thought: From Paradigms to Ideology.”Sociological Inquiry 53:136–151.
Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980.The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schnaiberg, Allan and Kenneth Alan Gould. 1994.Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilizations, and Movement Participation.”American Sociological Review 51 (August):464–481.
Stern, P., O. Young, and D. Druckman. 1992.Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimension. Washington: National Academy Press.
Ungar, Sheldon. 1994. “Apples and Oranges: Probing the Attitude-behavior Relationship for the Environment.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 31(3): 287–304.
Weigert, Andrew J. 1991. “Transverse Interaction: A Pragmatic Perspective on Environment as Other.”Symbolic Interaction 14:353–363.
Additional information
Naomi T. Krogman’s primary interest is in stakeholder framing of environmental disputes and natural resource policy change. She is currently a research sociologist at the Center for Socioeconomic Research at the University of Southwestern Louisiana and adjunct faculty in the Department of Sociology, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504-0198.
JoAnne DeRouen Darlington is a research sociologist focusing on social change and community sustainability emerging from the disastrous interactions between society and the environment. She is currently employed with the Natural Hazards Research Center, Campus Box 482, Boulder, CO 80309.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krogman, N.T., Darlington, J.D. Sociology and the environment: An analysis of journal coverage. Am Soc 27, 39–55 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692039
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692039