Skip to main content
Log in

Surviving and thriving: Bringing back sociology at the University of San Francisco

  • Articles
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a case study of successful departmental revitalization at the University of San Francisco. We examine the current crisis in the field of sociology and others’ recommendations for addressing it. Reforms are outlined that transformed USF Sociology from a nearly extinct program to a model department on campus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of American Colleges. 1991.Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major.

  • Costner, Herbert L 1979. “A Vision and an Image.”The American Sociologist 14 (May): 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzger, M. Herbert. 1988. “Undergraduate Education in Sociology as Career Training: The Case for an Internship Program.”Teaching Sociology 16 (January): 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Lee et al. 1995. “Mainstreaming Sociology: Strategies for the 21st Century.”Footnotes 23 (January):1, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabianic, David. 1991. “Declining Enrollments of Sociology Majors: Department Responses.”The American Sociologist 22 (Spring): 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floro, George K. 1986.Sociology for Life: Expanding Circles of Social Participation Through Scholarship, Community Service and Teaching. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Terence and Morris Janowitz (eds). 1993.Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, Elizabeth. 1990. “Designing an Inclusive Curriculum: Bringing All Women into the Core.”Women’s Studies Quarterly 1 & 2: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, Thomas, Peter Bishop, Samrenda Singh, David J. Jackson, Jerold Sicard, and Donna Rose. 1977. “A Strategy for Curriculum Development: The Constructive Use of Goals and Objectives.”Teaching Sociology 5 (October):1, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillian, Martha and Kathleen McKinney. 1985. “Reorganizing Sociology Undergraduate Curricula.”Teaching Sociology 12 (July):4, 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, William C. 1992. “The Good Sociology Departments: Will We Ever Find Them? Will We Even Try?”Teaching Sociology 20 (April):2. 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Gideon and Ted R. Vaughan. 1993. “The Bureaucratization of Sociology: Its Impact on Theory and Research.” In Vaughan, Ted R., Gideon Sjoberg, and Larry T. Reynolds (eds.),A Critique of Contemporary American Sociology. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Kenneth J., Walda Katz Fishman, Kenneth C. Land, Richard L. Simpson, and James D. Wright. 1991. “Symptoms of Administrative Threats to Abolish Sociology: A Panel for Chairpersons.” Panel presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, April 12.

  • Stauffer, Robert E. 1980. “Sociology and Liberal Education: The Ends We Serve.”Teaching Sociology 7 (April):3, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, Henry L. 1988. “Textbooks Are a Reflection of the Discipline.”Teaching Sociology 16 (October): 370–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, W. David, Alvin P. Short and Clarence C. Schultz. 1983. “Applied Sociology and the Current Crisis.”Teaching Sociology 11 (October):1, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Turpin.

Additional information

Jennifer Turpin’s research focuses on violence, militarism, gender, and war; Mike Webber’s research examines the relationship between business and politics; Anne Roschelle’s research concentrates on racial, ethnic, and underclass family networks; William Edwards studies urban development, globalization, and social inequality; and Joseph Angilella’s interests include religion and society and complex organizations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turpin, J., Webber, M.J., Roschelle, A.R. et al. Surviving and thriving: Bringing back sociology at the University of San Francisco. Am Soc 27, 8–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692037

Keywords

Navigation