Skip to main content
Log in

The isolation of crime, law, and deviance from the core of sociology

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of crime, law, and deviance is considered to be an isolated subarea of sociology that draws upon but does not contribute to the core of the discipline. Subareas, the specific and substantive topics of sociology, may be expected to make less obvious and direct contributions to the core than do theory, methodology, social organization, and social psychology as the major areas of sociology. And within subareas, studies that are readily applied may be considered less integrated and contributory to the discipline than the more “pure” or basic science subareas. This analysis examines the relationships between areas, subareas, and the core of sociology; the subject matter of sociological subareas; the actual versus perceptual isolation of crime, law, and deviance studies from the core; and the meaning of contribution. Measurement of contribution is limited to a survey ofSociological Abstracts, theCumulative Index of Sociology Journals, and the 1993 program for the American Sociological Association annual meetings. Comparing area and subarea publications and conference sessions suggests that, contrary to expectations, crime, law, and deviance research constitutes a significant portion of the available knowledge base. The perceived isolation of crime, law, and deviance from sociology may be explained by professional bias against applied studies of stigmatized populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Sociological Association Preliminary Program for the 88th Annual Meetings. 1993. Washington, D.C.: The American Sociological Association.

  • Becker, Howard S. 1963.Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1964.The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckman. 1966.The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1990. “Recent Trends Toward Increased Crime Control.” Paper presented to the Academy for Criminal Justice Sciences Annual Meetings.

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1991. “An Account of a Professional Ethics Violation in Sociology.”The American Sociologist 22: 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1992a. “Technological and Other Changes: Boundary Crossings in the Control of Deviance.” Paper presented to the Law and Society Association meetings.

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1992b. “The Isolation of Crime, Law, and Deviance From the Core of Sociology.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association 87th annual meeting.

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1992c. “The Artificiality of Criminology.” Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting.

  • Berry, Bonnie. 1992d. “Comment on the Connectedness and Contributions of Criminology: Response to Stitt and Giacopassi.”The Criminologist 17: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, Alfred, Jacqueline Cohen, and Richard Rosenfeld. 1991. “Trends and Deviation in Crime Rates: A Comparison of UCR and NCS Data for Burglary and Robbery.”Criminology 29: 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein, Henry H. 1993. “What Does ‘Drug-Related’ Mean? Reflections on the Problem of Objectification.”The Criminologist 18: 1, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, Roland. 1993. “Twenty-Five Years After the Crime Commission Report: Is the Field Still Data Starved?”The Criminologist 18: 1, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Albert K. 1955.Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson. 1979. “Social Changes and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activities Approach.”American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Ronald and Gary T. Marx. 1991. “Critique: No Soul in the New Machine: Technofallacies in the Electronic Monitoring Movement.”Justice Quarterly 8: 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, Derek B. and Ronald V. Clarke, eds. 1986.The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, Derek B. and Ronald V. Clarke. 1987. “Understanding Crime Displacement: An Application of Rational Choice Theory.”Criminology 25: 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumulative Index of Sociology Journals 1971–1985. 1987. Washington, D.C.: The American Sociological Association.

  • Curry, G. David and Irving A. Spergel. 1988. “Gang Homicide, Delinquency, and Community.”Criminology 26: 381–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1938.The Rules of Sociological Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1961.Moral Education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1966.Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenberg, Helen M. 1990. “The National Crime Survey and Rape: The Case of the Missing Question.”Justice Quarterly 7: 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermann, M. David and Richard J. Lundman. 1978.Corporate and Governmental Deviance: Problems of Organizational Behavior in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P. 1987. “The State of Criminological Theory.”Criminology 25: 821–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Malcolm D. and William A. Taggart. 1990. “A Comparative Analysis of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals.”Justice Quarterly 7: 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. Ronald, Joseph E. Scott, and Simon Dinitz. 1976. “Prisoners’ Unions: A Cross-National Investigation of Public Acceptance.”International Journal of Criminology and Penology 4: 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, Laud. 1970.Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Gary F. 1992. “Crime, Law, and Deviance: Symposium on Contributions of Studies of Crime, Law, and Deviance to General Issues in Sociology.” Presented at the American Sociological Association annual meetings.

  • Klockars, Carl B. 1974.The Professional Fence. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, Edwin M. 1951.Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebow, Elliot. 1967.Tally’s Corner. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, Allen E. 1977. “The Dissipation of Sociological Social Psychology.”The American Sociologist 12: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, Allen E. 1991. Newsletter for the Crime, Law, and Deviance Section of the American Sociological Association. Washington, D.C.: The American Sociological Association, Fall: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundman, Richard J. 1980.Police and Policing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1957.Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, Raymond J. and Larry Gould. 1992. “Criminology and Criminal Justice: Twin Sons of Different Mothers.” Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meetings.

  • Miller, Walter B. 1958. “Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency.”Journal of Social Issues 14: 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Richard G. 1993.Secrecy and Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, James W. L. 1985. “The Organization of Prison Violence.” Pp. 277–284 ofCorrectional Institutions, Third Edition, edited by Robert M. Carter, Daniel Glaser, and Leslie T. Wilkins. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, Harold E. 1988. “Violence as Unresponsiveness: Toward a New Conception of Crime.”Justice Quarterly 5: 539–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, Harold E. and Richard Quinney, eds. 1991.Criminology as Peacemaking. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, Richard. 1970.The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasons, Charles E. 1975. “Social Thought and Social Structure.”Criminology 13: 332–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Clifford R. 1930.The Jack Roller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Clifford R. and Henry D. McKay. 1942.Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, Jerome H. 1967. “A Sketch of the Policeman’s ‘Working Personality.’” Pp. 42–62 ofJustice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociological Abstracts. 1992. Subject Index. San Diego: International Sociological Association (cosponsor), Vol. 40, No. 1.

  • Sociological Abstracts. 1993. Data Base for 1963 through June 1993. San Diego: International Sociological Association (cosponsor).

  • Stitt, B. Grant and David J. Giacopassi. 1990. “Examining Trends in Criminological Thought.”Journal of Grime and Justice 13: 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitt, B. Grant and David J. Giacopassi. 1992. “Trends in the Connectivity of Theory and Research inCriminology.”The Criminologist 17: 1, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Edwin H. 1940.White Collar Crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Edwin H. 1947.Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, Gresham M. and Sheldon L. Messinger. 1960. “The Inmate Social System.” Pp. 5–19 ofTheoretical Studies in the Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, William I. 1928.The Child in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, Frederick M. 1927.The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Leslie T. 1990. “The Future of Graduate Education in Criminal Justice: Keeping Curriculum Fashionable? A Personal View.”Journal of Criminal Justice Education 1: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Frank. 1984. “The Demise of the Criminological Imagination: A Critique of Recent Criminology.”Justice Quarterly 1: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, Marvin, Robert Figlio, and Terence Thornberry. 1978.Evaluating Criminology. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, John M. 1978.Prison Employee Unionism: The Impact on Correctional Administration and Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Jock. 1986. “The Failure of Criminology: The Need for a Radical Realism.” Pp. 4–30 ofConfronting Crime, editors Roger Matthews and Jock Young, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie Berry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berry, B. The isolation of crime, law, and deviance from the core of sociology. Am Soc 25, 5–20 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691950

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691950

Keywords

Navigation