Advertisement

Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references

Abstract

The increasing number of references in scientific journal articles suggests editors may prefer articles with many references. Articles in first position in a journal issue are found to have more references. Researchers also may prefer articles with many references. Two hypotheses are proposed to explain this preference: 1) If references represent the adequacy of review of relevant literature (an explanation “internal” to science), then the number of references per page will affect citations. 2) If references directly influence readers’ judgment of quality (an explanation “external” to science), then the total number of references will affect citations. Regression analysis of articles in sociology supports hypothesis two. References may affect citations to an article; references per page do not. The ideal number of references in a sociology article is estimated at sixty-six.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abt, Helmut A. 1984. “Citations to Single and Multiauthored Papers.”Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 96: 746–49.

  2. American Sociological Association. 1987.Guide to Graduate Departments of Sociology. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.

  3. Bakanic, Von, Clark McPhail and Rita J. Simon. 1987. “The Manuscript Review and Decision Making Process.”American Sociological Review 52: 631–42.

  4. Barnes, Barry. 1974.Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan.

  5. Bavelas, Janet B. 1978. “The Social Psychology of Citations.”Canadian Psychological Review 19: 158–63.

  6. Bayer, Alan E. 1982. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Marriage and Family Literature.”Journal of Marriage and the Family 44: 527–38.

  7. Bowen, Donald D., Robert Perloff and Jacob Jacoby. 1972. “Improving Manuscript Evaluation Procedures.”American Psychologist 27: 221–25.

  8. Brooks, Terrence A. 1985. “Private Acts and Public Objects: An Investigation of Citer Motivations.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36: 223–29.

  9. ——— 1986. “Evidence of Complex Citer Motivations.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37: 34–36.

  10. Cartter, Allan M. 1966.An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

  11. Chubin, Daryl. 1975. “The Journal as a Primary Data Source in the Sociology of Science.”Social Science Information 14: 157–68.

  12. Cole, Jonathan R., and Stephen Cole. 1973.Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  13. Cole, Stephen, Gary Simon, and Jonathan R. Cole. 1988. “Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus?”American Sociological Review 53: 152–56.

  14. Cronin, Blaise. 1980. “Some Reflections on Citation Habits in Psychology.”Journal of Information Science 2: 309–11.

  15. ———. 1981. “The Need for a Theory of Citing.”Journal of Documentation 37: 16–24.

  16. Form, William. 1988. “On References (editor’s comment).”American Sociological Review 53: vii.

  17. Fox, John. 1984.Linear Statistical Models and Related Methods: With Applications to Social Research. New York: Wiley.

  18. Garvey, William D., Stephen D. Gottfredson and James G. Simmons. 1984. “A Comparison of Two Major Scientific Information Exchange Processes in Psychology.”American Psychologist 39: 11–21.

  19. ———, and Belver C. Griffith. 1971. “Scientific Communication: Its Role in the Conduct of Research and Creation of Knowledge.”American Psychologist 26: 349–62.

  20. Gilbert, G. Nigel. 1977. “Referencing as Persuasion.”Social Studies of Science 7: 113–22.

  21. Glenn, Norval D. 1971. “American Sociologists’ Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.”The American Sociologist 6: 298–303.

  22. Gottfredson, Stephen D. 1978. “Evaluating Psychological Research Reports: Dimensions, Reliability, and Correlates of Quality Judgments.”American Psychologist 33: 920–34.

  23. Hargens, Lowell L. 1988. “Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates.”American Sociological Review 53: 139–51.

  24. ———, and Diane H. Felmlee. 1984. “Structural Determinants of Stratification in Science.”American Sociological Review 49: 685–97.

  25. Institute for Scientific Information. 1989.Social Science Citation Index. MRDB.

  26. Jones, Lyle V., Gardner Lindzey and Porter E. Coggeshall. 1982.An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

  27. Kulis, Stephen. 1988. “The Representation of Women in Top Ranked Sociology Departments.”American Sociologist 19: 203–17.

  28. Latour, Bruno. 1987.Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: /Harvard University Press.

  29. ——— and Steve Woolgar. 1979.Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  30. Lin, Nan, William D. Garvey and Carnot E. Nelson. 1970. “A Study of the Communication Structure of Science.” Pp. 23–60 in Carnot E. Nelson and Donald K. Pollack (Eds.),Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

  31. Lindsey, Duncan. 1978.The Scientific Publication System in Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  32. Lindsey, Duncan. 1980. “Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship.”Social Studies of Science 10: 145–62.

  33. Logan, John R. 1988. “Producing Sociology: Time Trends in Authorship of Journal Articles, 1975–1986.American Sociologist 19: 167–80.

  34. Long, J. Scott, Robert McGinnis and Paul D. Allison. 1980. “The Problem of Junior-Authored Papers in Constructing Citation Counts.”Social Studies of Science 10: 127–43.

  35. Maddala, G. S. 1977.Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  36. Mahoney, Michael J. 1976.Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. Ballinger.

  37. Norusis, Marija J. 1988.SPSS/PC+ V2.0 Base Manual. SPSS Inc.

  38. Oromaner, Mark. 1975. “Collaboration and Impact: The Career of Multi-Authored Publications.”Social Science Information 14: 147–55.

  39. Oster, Sharon. 1980. “The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts.”The American Economic Review 70: 444–48.

  40. Over, Ray. 1982. “Collaborative Research and Publication in Psychology.”American Psychologist 37: 996–1001.

  41. Presser, Stanley. 1980. “Collaboration and the Quality of Research.”Social Studies of Science 10: 95–101.

  42. Price, Derek J. de Solla. 1963.Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

  43. ———. 1970. “Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology, and Nonscience.” In Carnot E. Nelson & Donald K. Pollock (Eds.)Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, MA: /Heath and Co.

  44. ———. 1986.Little Science, Big Science…And Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

  45. Ravetz, J. R. 1971.Scientific Knowledge and its Social Consequences. Clarendon.

  46. Roche, Thomas and David L. Smith. 1978. “Frequency of Citations as Criterion for the Ranking of Departments, Journals, and Individuals.”Sociological Inquiry 48: 49–57.

  47. Sacco, William P. and Suzette Milana. 1984. “Increase in Number of Authors per Article in Ten APA Journals: 1960–1980.”Cognitive Therapy and Research 8: 77–84.

  48. Scott, William A. 1974. “Interreference Agreement on Some Characteristics of Manuscripts Submitted to theJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.”American Psychologist 29: 698–702.

  49. Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer. 1985.Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  50. Small, Henry G. 1978. “Cited Documents as Concept Symbols.”Social Studies of Science 8: 327–40.

  51. Smart, J. C. and A. E. Bayer. 1986. “Author Collaboration and Impact: A Note on Citation Rates of Single and Multiple Authored Articles.”Scientometrics 10: 297–305.

  52. Sociological Abstracts Inc. 1984, 1985, 1988.Sociological Abstracts.

  53. Stewart, John A. 1983. “Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles.”Social Forces 62: 166–89.

  54. Teevan, James J. 1980. “Journal Prestige and Quality of Sociological Articles.”The American Sociologist 15: 109–12

  55. Tomer, Christinger. 1986. “A Statistical Assessment of Two Measures of Citation: The Impact Factor and the Immediacy Index.”Information Processing and Management 22: 251–58.

  56. Weisheit, Ralph A. and Robert M. Regoli. 1984. “Ranking Journals.”Scholarly Publishing: 313–25.

  57. Ziman, John. 1984.An Introduction to Science Studies. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Michael J. Lovaglia.

Additional information

is pursuing research in interpersonal relations and the sociology of science.

Drafts of this paper have benefited from the criticism of Geoffrey Tootell, Yehouda Shenhav, Paul Munroe, Morris Zelditch, Jr., Lowell Hargens, and Siniša Maričić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovaglia, M.J. Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references. Am Soc 22, 49–64 (1991) doi:10.1007/BF02691867

Download citation

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Citation Count
  • American Sociological Review
  • Academic Affiliation
  • Journal Issue