, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 916–929 | Cite as

Validation of a fish farm waste resuspension model by use of a particulate tracer discharged from a point source in a coastal environment

  • Chris J. CromeyEmail author
  • Thom D. Nickell
  • Kenneth D. Black
  • Paul G. Provost
  • Colin R. Griffiths


To validate a resuspension model of particulate material (salmonid farm wastes), a UV fluorescent particle tracer was selected with similar settling characteristics. Tracer was introduced to the seabed (water depth ≈30 m) and sediment samples taken on days 0, 3, 10, 17 and 30 to measure the horizontal and vertical distribution of tracer in sediments. A concentric sampling grid was established at radii of 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 700 and 1, 000 m from the source on transects 30° apart. The bulk of the deployed tracer was initially concentrated in an area 25 m radius from the release point; tracer was observed to steadily decrease to zero over a period of 30 days. In a 200 m region measured from the release point in the direction of the residual current, the redeposition of tracer was low. A Lagrangian particle tracking model was validated using these observed data by varying resuspension model parameters within limits to obtain the best agreement between spatial and temporal distributions. The validated model generally gave good predictions of total mass budgets (±7% of total tracer released), particulary where tracer concentrations were high near the release point. Best fit model parameters (critical erosion shear stress=0.018 N m−2, erodibility constan=60 g m−2 d−1) are at the low end of reported parameters for coastal resuspension models. Such a low critical erosion shear stress indicates that the frequency of resuspension and deposition events for freshly deposited material is high.


Point Source Particulate Material Particle Tracer Release Point Residual Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ackefors, H. andM. Enell. 1994. The release of nutrients and organic matter from aquaculture systems in Nordic countries.Journal of Applied Ichthyology 10:225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, C. M. 1982. Numerical simulation of contaminant dispersion in estuarine flow.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (A) 381:179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amos, C.L., T. Feeney, T. F. Sutherland, andJ. L. Luternauer. 1997. The stability of fine grained sediments from the Fraser River delta.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45:507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, K. D., S. Fleming, T. D. Nickell, andP. M. F. Pereira. 1997. The effects of Ivermectin, used to control sea lice on caged farmed salmonids, on infaunal polychaetes.ICES Journal of Marine Science 54:276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowden, K. F. 1983. Physical Oceanography of Coastal Waters. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, T. N. andK. A. Turner. 1983. Deposition of Sewage Sludge on a Rippled Sand Bed. Report IT248. Hydraulics Research. Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Y. S., M. C. M. Beveridge, andT. C. Telfer. 1999. Settling rate characteristics and nutrient content of the faeces of Atlantic salmon,Salma salar, and the implications for modelling of waste dispersion.Aquaculture Research 30:395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, S. andA. J. Elliot. 1998. Modelling suspended sediment concentrations in the Firth of Forth.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47:235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cromey, C. J., K. D. Black, A. Edwards, andI. A. Jack. 1998. Modelling the deposition and biological effects of organic carbon from marine sewage discharges.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47:295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cromey, C. J., T. D. Nickell, andK. D. Black. 1999. Economic Site Asessment through Modelling the Effects of Carbon Deposition to the Benthos from Large Scale Salmon Mariculture DEPOMOD. Report to the Natural Environment Research Council Link. Internal Report no. 214. Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll, U.K.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, I. M., P. Smith, T. D. Nickell, andP. G. Provost. 1996. Interactions of salmon farming and benthic microbiology in sea lochs, p. 33–39.In. K. D. Black (ed.), Aquaculture and Sea Lochs. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll, U.K.Google Scholar
  12. De-Jonge, V. N. andJ. van den Bergs. 1987. Experiments on the resuspension of estuarine sediments containing benthic diatoms.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 24:725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delvigne, G. A. L. 1996. Laboratory Investigations on the Fate and Physicochemical Properties of Drill Cuttings after Discharge into the Sea. Environment and Proctection Form Report no 2.61/202, The Physical and Biological Effects of Processed Oily Drill Cuttings. Environment and Protection Forum, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  14. Dudley, R. W., V. G. Panchang, andC. R. Newell. 2000. Application of a comprehensive modeling strategy for the management of net-pen aquaculture waste transport.Aquaculture 187:319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyer, K. R. 1979. Estuarine Hydrology and Sedimentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  16. Findlay, R. H. andL. Watling. 1997. Prediction of benthic impact for salmon net-pens based on the balance of benthic oxygen supply and demand.Marine Ecology Progress Series 155: 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleming, G. andR. A. Walker. 1981. The Loch Eil Project: Simulation of the hydrology and sediment inputs to Loch Eil.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 55:103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Futawatari, T. andT. Kusuda. 1993. Modelling of suspended sediment transport in a tidal river, p. 504–519. Coastal and Estuarine Studies, No. 42. Springer-Verlag. New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gillibrand, P. A. andW. R. Turrell. 1997. Simulating the dispersion and settling of particulate material and associated substances from salmon farms. Report No. 3/97. CFAS, Aberdeen, U.K.Google Scholar
  20. Gowen, R. J., N. B. Bradbury, andJ. R. Brown. 1989. The use of simple models in assessing two of the interactions between fish farming and the marine environment, p. 135–155.In R. Billard and N. de Pauw (eds.), Aquaculture— A Technology in Progress. European Aquaculture Society. Bredene, Belgium.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, P. K., K. Pittman, andA. Ervik. 1991. Organic waste from marine fish farms— Effects on the sea bed, p. 105–119.In T. Mäkinen (ed.), Marine Aquaculture and Environment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, J. R. W., R. N. Gorley, andC. A. Bartlett. 1993. ECoS Version 2—A User Manual. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, U.K.Google Scholar
  23. Heathershaw, A. D. 1988. Sediment transport in the sea, on beaches and in rivers: Part I—Fundamental principles.Journal of Naval Research 14:154–170.Google Scholar
  24. Hendricks, T. J. 1987. Predicting Sediment Quality Around Outfalls. Southern Californian Coastal Water Research Project Authority, El Segunda, California.Google Scholar
  25. Hevia, M., H. Rosenthal, andR. J. Gowen. 1996. Modelling benthic deposition under fish cages.Journal of Applied Ichthyology 12:71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmer, M. andE. Kristensen. 1994. Organic matter mineralization in an organic-rich sediment: Experimental stimulation of sulfate reduction by fish food pellets.FEMS Microbiology Ecology 14:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krone, R. B. 1962. Plume Studies of the Transport of Sediment in Estuarial Shoaling Processes. University of California Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory and Sanitation Research Laboratory. Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  28. Lesht, B. M. 1979. Relationship between sediment resuspension and the statistical frequency distribution of bottom shear stress.Marine Geology 32:M19-M27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis, R. andJ. O. Lewis. 1987. Shear stress variations in an estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 25:621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lund-Hansen, L. C., J. Valeur, M. Pejrup, andA. Jensen. 1997. Sediment fluxes, resuspension and accumulation rates at two wind-exposed coastal sites and in a sheltered bay.Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 44:521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh, J. 1995. Development of a tracer technique for the study of suspended sediment dynamics in aquatic environments. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Plymouth, Plymouth, U.K.Google Scholar
  32. McLellan, H. J. 1965. Elements of Physical Oceanography. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  33. Mead, C. T. 1991. A Detailed Description of SEDPLUME-RW. Random Walk Simulations of the Dispersal of Sewage Effluent and Dredged Spoil (Appendix A). Hydraulics Research Limited, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  34. Mead, C. T. andJ. G. Rodger. 1991. Random walk simulations of the dispersal of dredged spoil, p. 783–788.In J. Lee and D. Cheung (eds.. Environmental Hydraulics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  35. Mehta, A. J. 1984. Laboratory studies on cohesive sediment deposition and erosion, p. 427–445.In W. Van Leussen and J. Dronkers (eds.), Physical Processes in Estuaries. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U. K.Google Scholar
  36. Michels, K. H. andT. R. Healy. 1999. Evaluation of an inner shelf site off Tauranga Harbour, New Zealand, for disposal of muddy-sandy dredged sediments.Journal of Coastal Research 15: 830–838.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, B. 1998. An assessment of Sediment Copper and Zinconcentrations at Mariine Caged Fish Garms in SEPA West Region. Final Report w98/04. Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Stirling, U.K.Google Scholar
  38. Moon, V., W. de Lange, S. Warren, andT. Healy. 1994. Postdisposal behaviour of sandy dredged material at an open-water, inner shelf disposal site.Journal of Coastal Research 10:651–662.Google Scholar
  39. Morrisey, D. J., M. M. Gibb, S. E. Pickmere, andR. G. Cole. 2000. Predicting impacts and recovery of marine-farm sites in Stewart Island, New Zealand, from the Findlay-Watling model.Aquaculture 185:257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neumann, G. andW. J. Pierson. 1966. Principles of Physical Oceanography. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  41. Nichols, M. M. 1985. Temporal variations of sediment resuspension.Estuaries 8:120A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nickell, T. D. andS. J. Anderson. 1997. Environmental Assessment of Loch Harport. Report no. UDI 911. Altra Safety and Environment Ltd., Aberdeen, U.K.Google Scholar
  43. O’Connor, B. A. andJ. Nicholson. 1992. An estuarine and coastal sand transport model, p. 507–526.In D. Prandle (ed.) Dynamics and Exchanges in Estuaries and the Coastal Zone, Coastal and Estuarine Studies, no. 40, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Odd, N. V. M. andM. V. Owen. 1972. A two-layer model of mud transport in the Thames estuary.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 7517S:175–205.Google Scholar
  45. Partheniades, E. 1965. Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils.Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 91:105–139.Google Scholar
  46. Puls, W. andJ. Sündermann. 1990. Simulation of suspended sediment dispersion in the North Sea, p. 356–372.In R. T. Cheng. (ed.), Residual Currents and Long Term Transport, Coastal and Estuarine Studies no. 38. Springer-Verlag. New York.Google Scholar
  47. Rodger, G. K., I. M. Davies, andG. Topping. 1992. Retention of trace-metal contaminants in the sediment at an accumulating sewage-sludge disposal site.Water Research 26:111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roman, M. R. andD. R. Tenore. 1978. Tidal resuspension in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. I. Seasonal changes in the resuspension of organic carbon and chlorophylla.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 5:37–46.Google Scholar
  49. Sanford, L. P. 1992. New sedimentation, resuspension and burial.Limnology and Oceanography 37:1164–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sanford, L. P. andJ. P. Halka. 1993. Assessing the paradigm of mutually exclusive erosion and deposition of mud, with examples from upper Chesapeake Bay.Marine Geology 114:37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanford, L. P., W. Panageotou, andJ. P. Halka. 1991. Tidal resuspension of sediments in northern Chesapeake Bay.Marine Geology 97:87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scottish, Environmental, Protection Agency. 1999. Short Term Ecomonitoring Study of a Particulate Discharge. Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
  53. Silvert, W. 1992. Assessing environmental impacts of finfish aquaculture in marine waters.Aquaculture 107:67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silvert, W. andJ. W. Sowles. 1996. Modelling environmental impacts of marine finfish aquaculture.Journal of Applied Icthyology 12:75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soulsby, R. L. 1983. The bottom boundary layer of shelf seas, p. 189–266.In B. Johns (ed.), Physical Oceanography of Coastal and Shelf Seas. Elseriver, London, U.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Southern Californian Coastal Water (SCCWRP). 1992. Modification and Verification of Sediment Deposition Models. Final Report. Southern Californian Coastal Water Research Project Authority. El Segundo, California.Google Scholar
  57. Telsson, C. 1991. Cohesive suspended sediment transport: Feasibility and limitations of numerical modelling.Journal of Hydraulic Research 29:755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorne, P. D., J. J. Williams, andA. D. Heathershaw. 1989. In-situ acoustic measurements of marine gravel threshold and transport.Sedimentology 36:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Uncles, R. J., R. C. A. Elliott, andA. D. Heathershaw. 1989. In-situ acoustic measurements of marine gravel threshold and transport.Sedimentology 36:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Uncles, R. J., R. C. A. Elliott, andS. A. Weston. 1985. Observed fluxes of water, salt and suspended sediment in a partly mixed estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 20:147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Uotila, J. 1991. Metal contents and spread of fish farming sludge in southwestern Finland, p. 121–126.In T. Mäkinen (ed.), Marine Aquaculture and Environment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  62. Velegrakis, A. F., S. Gao, R. Lafite, J. P. Dupont, M. F. Huault, L. A. Nash, andM. B. Collins. 1997. Resuspension and advection processes affecting suspended particulate matter concentrations in the central English Channel.Journal of Sea Research 38:17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Washburn, L., B. H. Jones, A. Bratkovich, T. D. Dickey, andM. S. Chen. 1991. Mixing, dispersion, and resuspension in vicinity of ocean wastewater plume.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 118:38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolanski, E. andR. Gibbs. 1992. Resuspension and clearing of dredge spoils after dredging, Cleveland Bay, Australia.Water Environment Research 64:910–914.Google Scholar

Source of Unpublished Material

  1. McKee, D. Unpublished data. Transmissometer trials in the Firth of Lorn, Scotland. Department of Physics and Applied Physics, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris J. Cromey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thom D. Nickell
    • 1
  • Kenneth D. Black
    • 1
  • Paul G. Provost
    • 1
  • Colin R. Griffiths
    • 1
  1. 1.Dunstaffnage Marine LaboratoryScottish Association for Marine ScienceObanU.K.

Personalised recommendations