Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amsel, A. (1961). Hope comes to learning theory. Review of O.H. Mowrer’sLearning Theory and Behavior.Contemporary Psychology, 6: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A. (1962). Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension.Psychological Review, 69: 306–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A. (1989).Behaviorism, neobehaviorism, and cognitivism in learning theory: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A. (1992).Frustration theory: An analysis of dispositional learning and memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A., & Rashotte, M.E. (1984).Mechanisms of adaptive behavior: Clark L. Hull’s theoretical papers, with commentary. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R.R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A mathematical model for simple learning.Psychological Review, 58: 313–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of Skinner’sVerbal Behavior.Language, 35: 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (1989).Memory in the Real World. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.B., & Daly, J.T. (1982). A mathematical model of reward and aversive nonreward: Its application in over 30 appetitive learning situations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111: 441–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. (1979). Review ofCognitive Processes in Animal Behavior.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31: 551–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. (1980).Contemporary Animal Learning Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W.K. (1950).Personality and Psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W.K., & Skinner, B.F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29: 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, W. (1981). A biological critique of sociobiological theory. In E. White (Ed.),Sociobiology and human politics. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O. (1949).The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 62: 243–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D.L. (1992). 25 years of learning and memory: Was the cognitive revolution a mistake? In D.E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and Performance XIV. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.Journal of Physiology, 160: 106–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1929). A functional interpretation of the conditioned reflex.Psychological Review, 36, 498–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1934a). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy and maze learning: Part 1.Psychological Review, 41: 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1934b). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy and maze learning: Part 2.Psychological Review, 41: 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1943).Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.R. (1991). Nerve cells and behavior. In E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz, & R.M. Jessell (Eds.),Principles of neural science, New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krechevsky, I. (1938). A study of the continuity of the problem-solving process.Psychological Review, 45: 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. (1987). Successions in psychology. Review ofThe cognitive revolution in psychology.Science, 236: 1683–1684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960).Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.E. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar.American Psychologist, 17: 748–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, M. & Petrie, H.L. (1984). Memories and habits: Some implications for the analysis of learning and retention. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.),Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R.A. (1980).Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Studies in associative learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black and W.F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, C.P. (1982). Metaknowledge in the pigeon: The previously reinforced response.Animal Learning & Behavior, 10: 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, C.P. (1982). The local organization of behavior: A dissociation between a pigeon’s behavior and a self-report of that behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1938).The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary?Psychological Review, 57: 193–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1957).Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K.W. (1940). Continuous versus non-continuous interpretations of discrimination learning.Psychological Review, 47: 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L.R. (1982). The neuropsychology of human memory.Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 5: 241–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. & Belluzzi, J.D. (1989). Cellular investigations of behavioral reinforcement.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 13: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G.J. (1984). Memory: Time finding in organisms. In L.R. Squire and N. Butlers (Eds.),Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W.A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system.Psychological Review, 86: 44–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This essay was adapted from the Horsley Gantt Lecture delivered at the meeting of the Pavlovian Society, September 1991. The lecture was in part an adaptation of excerpts from a book,Behaviorism, Neobehaviorism, and Cognitivism in Learning Theory: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amsel, A. Confessions of a neobehaviorist. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 27, 336–346 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691168

Keywords

Navigation