Abstract
The effects of the process parameters of ultrasonic power and normal bonding force on bond formation at ambient temperatures have been investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis. A model was developed based on classical microslip theory1 to explain the general phenomena observed in the evolution of bond footprints left on the substrate. Modifications to the model are made due to the inherent differences in geometry between ball-bonding and wedge-bonding. Classical microslip theory describes circular contacts undergoing elastic deformation. It is shown in this work that a similar microslip phenomenon occurs for elliptical wire-to-flat contacts with plastically deformed wire. It is shown that relative motion exists at the bonding interface as peripheral microslip at lower powers, transitioning into gross sliding at higher powers. With increased normal bonding forces, the transition point into gross sliding occurs at higher ultrasonic bonding powers. These results indicate that the bonding mechanisms in aluminum wire wedge-bonding are very similar to those of gold ball-bonding, both on copper substrate. In ultrasonic wedge-bonding onto copper substrates, the ultrasonic energy is essential in forming bonding by creating relative interfacial motion, which removes the surface oxides.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.D. Mindlin, Trans. ASME, Ser. E, J. Appl. Mech. 16, 259 (1949).
G.G. Harman, Wire Bonding in Microelectronics—Materials, Processes, Reliability, and Yield, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill. New York, NY, 1997.
V.H. Winchell and H.M. Berg, IEEE Trans. Components, Hybrids Manufacturing Technol. CHMT-1, 211 (1978).
G.G. Harman and K.O. Leedy, 10th Annual Proc. Reliability Physics (New York: IEEE, 1972), pp. 49–56.
I. Lum, J.P. Jung, and Y. Zhou, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A, 1279 (2005).
C.W. Tan and A.R. Daud, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 13, 309 (2002).
N. Srikanth et al., Thin Solid Films 462–463, 339 (2004).
N. Murdeshwar and J.E. Krzanowski, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28A, 2663 (1997).
C.L. Yeh and Y.S. Lai, Microelectron. Reliability 45, 371 (2005).
D. Degryse, B. Vandevelde, and E. Beyne, IEEE Trans. Components Packaging Technol. 27, 643 (2004).
J.E. Krzanowski, IEEE Trans. Components Hybrids Manufacturing Technol. 13, 176 (1990).
G.G. Harman and J. Albers, IEEE Trans. Parts, Hybrids Packaging PHP-13, 406 (1977).
J.E. Krzanowski and N. Murdeshwar, J. Electron. Mater. 19, 919 (1990).
Y. Takahashi et al., IEEE Trans. Components Hybrids Manufacturing Technol. Part A 19, 1996.
H.A. Mohamed and J. Washburn, Welding J. 54, 302 (1975).
B. Langenecker, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics SU-13 (1966), pp. 1–8.
Y. Zhou, X. Li, and N.J. Noolu, IEEE Trans. Components Packaging Technol. 28 (4) 810 (2005).
M. Mayer (Ph.D. Dissertation 13685, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, 2002).
F. Osterwald, K.D. Lang, and H. Reichl, (Reston, VA: ISHM, 1996), p. 426–431.
ASME Wear Control Handbook, 1980.
M. Mayer and J. Schwizer, Proc. IMAPS 2002, Proc. SPIE (Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002), vol. 4931, pp. 626–631.
K.L. Johnson, Proc. R. Soc. A 230, 531 (1954).
Z.N. Liang, F.G. Kuper, and M.S. Chen, Microelectron. Reliability 38, 1287 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lum, I., Mayer, M. & Zhou, Y. Footprint study of ultrasonic wedge-bonding with aluminum wire on copper substrate. J. Electron. Mater. 35, 433–442 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02690530
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02690530