Abstract
This study examines the employment and earnings of self-employed women in urban Tanzania. Most of the empirical evidence comes from a household survey that interviewed 5,543 adults in seven mainland towns during 1971. Although women represent almost 28% of all urban self-employed, they are clustered into a few low-income activities. Women’s involvement in household and subsistence production leads them to work fewer hours in market activities, but their lower earnings are mostly due to their restricted access to education and capital.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The National Urban Mobility, Employment and Income Survey of Tanzania (NUMEIST, 1971). The 5,543 individuals surveyed in 1971 represented a random sample of the adult urban population of seven towns in mainland Tanzania. Of those interviewed, 48.1% were women. The survey contains detailed questions on education, migration, and labor force experience. NUMEIST has been a rich source of information on urban labor markets and has been the data base for several studies of rural-urban migration and urban unemployment.
W. Arthur Lewis, “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour,”The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, vol. 22, 1954, pp. 139–191.
R.H. Sabot, “Open Unemployment and the Employed Compound of Urban Surplus Labour,” inPapers in the Political Economy of Tanzania, ed. Kwan S. Kim, Robert B. Mabele, and Michael J. Schulteis (Nairobi: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979).
Sabot, p. 266.
Paul Bohannan and George Dalton,Markets in Africa (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday and Company, 1965), p. 16.
Willene A. Johnson, “The Economic Activities of Women in Urban Tanzania,” Columbia University, unpub. diss. 1983, pp. 118–124.
Marjorie Mbilinyi, “The ‘New Woman’ and Traditional Norms in Tanzania,”Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 10 (1972): 57–72.
Lourdes Beneria and Gita Sen, “Accumulation, Reproduction, and Women’s Role in Economic Development: Boserup Revisited,”Signs, Special Issue on Development and the Sexual Division of Labor, vol. 7 (1981): 279–298, p. 290fn.
Marjorie Mbilinyi, “Women: Producers and Reproducers in Peasant Production,” Economic Research Bureau Occasional Paper 77.3 University of Dar es Salaam, 1977, p. 12.
Thus, in matrilineal inheritance “property descends ‘homogeneously,’ e.g.,between males, even when it goesthrough females.” Jack Goody,Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), p. 6.
Mbilinyi, 1972, p. 66.
Mbilinyi, 1972, p. 67.
The United Republic of Tanzania,Law of Marriage, Act No. 5, 1971.
McCall’s study of self-employed women in Ghana concluded that marriage limited women’s earnings from self-employment by limiting both mobility and the ability to make independent entrepreneurial decisions. Daniel F. McCall, “The Effect on Family Structure of Changing Economic Activities of Women in a Gold Coast Town,” Columbia University, unpub. diss., 1956.
H. C. G. Hawkins,Wholesale and Retail Trade in Tanganyika: A Study of Distribution in East Africa: (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, 1965). 19. Hawkins, pp. 150–52.
Justinian Rweyemamu,Underdevelopment and Industrialization in Tanzania: A Study in Perverse Capitalist Industrial Development (Nairobi: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 29.
Dharam Ghai and Yash Ghai, “Asians in Tanzania: Problems and Prospects,” inSelf-Reliant Tanzania, ed. by Knud Eric Evendsen and Merete Teisen (Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House, 1969), p. 107.
Glen Cain, ╖‘Welfare Economics of Policies Toward Women,”Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 3 (1985), S375-S396, p. 381.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, W.A. Women and self-employment in Urban Tanzania. The Review of Black Political Economy 14, 245–257 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689892
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689892