This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
[For a list of the contents of this volume, see the entry in “Publications Received,”IJCT 4 (1997/98), 337–338.-W.H.]
This publication (Beth Cohen [ed.],The Distaff Side: Representing the Female in Homer's Odyssey [Oxford, 1995], sc. pp. 117–152), cited in a footnote on p. 19, is unaccountably missing from the list of acknowledgments (p. xv).
The contents of the volume are divided into five sections: “Historia”: C. Kannengiesser, “The interruptedDDC”, 3–13; F. Van Fleteren, “St. Augustine, Neoplatonism, and the Liberal Arts: The Background toDDC,” 14–24; P. Bright, “Biblical Ambiguity in African Exegesis,” 25–32; K. B. Steinhauser, “Codex Leningradensis Q.v.I.3: Some Unsolved Problems,” 33–43.—“Litterae”: C. Schäublin, “DDC: A Classic of Western Culture?” 47–67; A. Primmer, “The Function of thegenera dicendi inDDC 4,” 68–86; T. Kato, “Sonus et Verbum: DDC 1.13.12,” 87–94.—“Sensus”: R.A. Markus, “Signs, Communication, and Communities in Augustine'sDDC,” 97–108; R.J. Teske, “Criteria for Figurative Interpretation in St. Augustine,” 109–122; D. Dawson, “Sign Theory, Allegorical Reading, and the Motions of the Soul in DDC,” 123–141.—Doctrina”:. W.S. Babcock, “Caritas and Signification ifDDC 1–3,” 145–163; J.C. Cavadini, “The Sweetness of the World: Salvation and Rhetoric in Augustine'sDDC,” 164–181; J. Patout Burns, “Delighting the Spirit: Augustine's Practice of Figurative Interpretation,” 182–194; L. Sweeney, “Divine Attributes inDDC: Why Does Augustine Not List ‘Infinity’?”, 195–204.—“Receptus”: D.W.H. Arnold, “To Adjust Rather Than to Reconcile: DDC and the Oxford Movement,” 207–216; C. O’Regan, “DDC and Modern Hermeneutics,” 217–243.
For a list of the contents of this volume, see the entry in “Publications Received,” IJCT 2 (1995/96), 314f.
“Materialien zur Nachwirkung von Augustins SchriftDDC,”Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 17, 1974, 64–73.
Gorman, “The Diffusion of the Manuscripts of Saint Augustine'sDDC in the Early Middle Ages,”Revue bénédictine 95 (1985), 11–24; Forstner, “Eine frühmittelalterliche Interpretation der augustinischen Stillenhre,”Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 4, 1967, 61–71; Amos,The Origin and Nature of the Carolingian Sermon, Diss. Michigan State University, 1983, 394–397.
Footnotes
The volume is divided into three parts: Part 1, “Poetics”: Z.G. Barański, “The Poetics of Meter:Terza Rima, ‘Canto’, ‘Canzon’, ‘Cantica’”, 3–41; C. Kleinhenz, “Dante and the Art of Citation,” 43–61; G. Mazzotta, “Why Did Dante Write theComedy? Why and How Do We Read It?”, 63–79—Part 2, “Minor Works”: D.S. Cervigni and E. Vasta, “From Manuscript to Print: The Case of Dante'sVita Nuova,” 83–114; R.L. Martinez, “‘Nasce il Nilo’: Justice, Wisdom, and Dante's Canzone ‘Tre donne intorno al cor mi son venute’,” 115–153; A.R. Ascoli, “Palinode and History in the Oeuvre of Dante”, 155–186.—Part 3, “Reception”: R.A. Shoaf, “‘Noon Englissh Digne’: Dante in Late Medieval England,” 189–203; K. Brownlee, “Literary Genealogy and the Problem of the Father: Christine de Pizan and Dante,” 205–235; B. Richardson, “Editing Dante's,Commedia, 1472–1629”, 237–262; N.J. Vickers, “Dante in the Video Decade”, 263–276.
Chapters 2 and 3 have previously appeared in print (inExemplaria andPoetics), along with portions of two other chapters, 6 and 7 (inSwiss Papers in English Language and Literature).
Recently reviewed in this journal (IJCT) 5 (1998/99) 615–618 by Margaret Tudeau-Clayton.
Taylor then moves on to the chain as a bond between extremes (para. 6); to the knot of love as god, in Dante (para. 7); to the physical bond of love in marriage (para. 8); to all of these, in Theseus (para. 9); to the chain as female, found in Alan of Lille and Boethius (para. 10); to the Prime Mover as masculine and matter as female, in Boethius 3 m9, Plato'sTimaeus, and other works (para. 11); to Purveyance as the matrix of matter, in Alan and Boethius again (para. 12); to the feminized Providence that shapes the universe, with feminized Nature as form (para. 13); to Chaucer’s Nature, as God's mediator in shaping forms in thePhysician's Tale (para. 14); to the bond of love asconnexio (para. 15); to Nature as between God and man's light (para. 16); and so forth.
The contents of the volume are as follows: Introduction: J. Guy, “The 1590s: The second reign of Elizabeth I?”, 1–19; 1: S. Adams, “The patronage of the crown in Elizabethan politics: the 1590s in perspective,” 20–45; 2: N. Mears, “Regnum Cecilianum? A Cecilian perspective of the Court,” 46–64; 3: P.E.J. Hammer, “Patronage at Court, faction and the Earl of Essex”, 65–86; 4: L.L. Peck, “Peers, patronage and the politics of history, 87–108; 5: H. Morgan, “The fall of Sir John Perrot”, 109–125; 6: J. Guy, “The Elizabethan establishment and the ecclesiastical polity,” 126–149; 7: P. Collinson, “Ecclesiastical vitriol: religious satire in the 1590s and the invention of puritanism”, 150–170; 8: J. Wormald, “Ecclesiastical vitriol: the kirk, the puritans and the future king of England”, 171–191; 9: J. Sharpe, “Social strain and social dislocation , 1585–1603”, 192–211; 10: R.C. McCoy, “Lord of liberty: Francis Davison and the cult of Elizabeth”, 212–228; 11: A. Fox, “The complaint of poetry for the death of liberality: the decline of literary patronage in the 1590s”, 229–257; 12: M. Axton, “Summer's Last Will and Testament: revels’ end”, 258–273; 13: F. Levy, “The theatre and the Court in the 1590s”, 274–300.
Footnotes
EJP,Medieval and Renaissance letter treatises and form letters, vol. II:A census of manuscripts found in part of Western Europe, Japan, and the United States of America, Davis Medieval Texts and Studies 9 (Leiden and New York, 1994).
Catalogo del Museo nazionale di Napoli. Raccolta pornografica (Naples, 1866); cf. Stanislas Marie Cesar Famin,Musée royal de Naples: peintures, bronzes et statues erotiques du cabinet secret: avec leur explication (Paris, 1857).
Dover, “Expurgation of Greek Literature,” in:Les études classiques aux XIXe et XXe siècles: leur place dans l'histoire des idées, Fondation Hardt: Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 26 (Geneva, 1980), 55–89; Turner: e.g.,The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain (New Haven, 1981); Jenkyns: e.g.,The Victorians and Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).
E.g., Bluestone,Women and the Ideal Society: Plato’s Republicand Modern Myths of Gender (Amherst, Mass., 1987).
Richlin’s anthology contains an essay by the present reviewer on “Athenaeus' concept of the pornographic.”
This volume was reviewed by the present reviewer in an earlier issue of this journal:IJCT 4 (1996/97), 111–113.
For a list of the contents of this volume, see the entry in “Publications Received” 3.4 (Spring 1997), p. 535f.
For example, see C. Baker,Shelley's Major Poetry: The Fabric of a Vision (Princeton, 1948); W. Keach, Shelley's Style (London, 1984).
T. Webb,The Violet in the Crucible (Oxford, 1976), p. 62.
P. Foot,Red Shelley (1980). See also P.M.S. Dawson,The Unacknowledged Legislator: Shelley and Politics (Oxford, 1980); M. Scrivener,Radical Shelley: The Philosophical Anarchism and Utopian Thought of Percy Bysshe Shelley (Princeton, 1982).
M. Butler,Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries (Oxford, 1981), pp 127–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mossé, C., Doherty, L.E., Wilson, L.H. et al. Book reviews. Int class trad 6, 95–157 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689214
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689214