References
Friedrich Pfister, “Daimonismos”, inPaulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband VII, ed. Wilhelm Kroll and Karl Mittelhaus (Stuttgart: Alfred Druckenmüller, 1940), cols. 100–14.
Friedrich Pfister, “Katharsis,” inPaulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband VI ed. Wilhelm Kroll (Stuttgart: Alfred Druckenmüller, 1935), cols. 146–62.
H. S. Versnel, “Daimon”, inThe Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn., ed. Simon Hornblower and Antony Spawforth (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 426.
F. Tateo, B. Teuber, and R. E. Schade, “Ciceronianismus,” inHistorisches Wörterbuchder Rhetorik, ed. Gert Ueding, 4 vols. to date (Tübingen: Max Niemyer, 1992-98), vol. 2 (1994), cols. 225–47. (On theHistorisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik [HWRh] in general see the present reviewer’s review article in this journal [IJCT], 1.4 [Spring 1995], 130–35 and his follow-up review inIJCT 6 [1999/2000], 447–49.—W.H.)
Carolyn Wood, “Concept of the Baroque,” inEncyclopedia of the Renaissance, ed. Paul Grendler, 6 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1999), vol. 1, pp. 181–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kallendorf, C. Rezeptionsgeschichte comes of age:Der Neue Pauly and the classical tradition, I. Int class trad 7, 58–66 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689201
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689201