Skip to main content
Log in

Construct validity of the Sivik Psychosomaticism test and test of Operational style: Correlations with Karolinska Scheme of Personality

  • Papers
  • Published:
Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the construct validity (convergent and divergent) of Sivik Psycho Somaticism test (SPS) and test of Operationality (OPER), Pearson correlation coefficients between SPS scales and subscales and Karolinska Scheme of Personality (KSP) were calculated. Seventy-eight healthy individuals and 196 psychosomatic patients completed the SPS and OPER tests and KSP. The results show that the SPS and OPER subscales are significantly correlated to most KSP subscales. The correlations were higher for the psychosomatic group than for the normal population. The results confirm the validity of the SPS and OPER constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellak, L. (1954).The Thematic Apperception Test and the Children’s Apperception Test in clinical use. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calsyn, D., Lonks, J., and Freman, C. (1976). The use of the MMPI with chronic low back patients with a mixed diagnoses.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32:532–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1968). A lifesetting conductive to illness: The giving-up-given-up complex.Annualas of Internal Medicine, 69:293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Schnurr, P. (1995). The Relationship Between Trauma, PTSD and Physical Health. In Friedman, M., Charney, D., and Deutch, A. (Eds).Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress, Lippincott-Raven Publishers.

  • Friedman, M.J. and Yehuda, R. (1995). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Comorbidity. Psychobiological Approaches to Differential Diagnoses. In Friedman, M., Charney, D., and Deutch, A. (Ed).Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress, Lippincott-Raven Publishers.

  • Henry, J.P. (1993). Psychological and Physiological Responses to Sress: The Right Hemisphere and the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis, An Inquirt into Problems of Human Bonding.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 28:368–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insel T.R. (1993). Oxytocin and the Neuroendocrine Basis of Affiliation: in Schulkin J (ed):Hormonal Induced Change in Mind and Brain, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystal, H. (1981): Alexithymia and the effectiveness of psychoanalytic treatment.Presented at the 6th World Congress of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine (ICPM), Montreal.

  • Marty, P. and de M’Uzan, M. (1963). La pensée opératoire.Review Fransoas. Psychanal, 27: Suppl. 1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemiah, J.C. (1977). Alexithymia: Theoretical considerations.Psychotherapy Psychosomatics 28:199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringsberg, K., Löwhagen, O., and Sivik, T. (1993). Psychological Differences Between Asthmatics and Patients Suffering from an Asthma-Like Condition, Functional Breathing Disorder: A Comparison Between the Two Groups Concerning Personality, Psychosocial and Somatic Parameters.Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science, October–December,28:(4), 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalling, D., Åsberg, M., Edman, G., and Oveland, L. (1987). Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology: Temperament traits associated withplatelet MAO activity.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 76:172–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. (1973). Conversion of massive anxiety into hearth attack.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 360:378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifneos, M. (1973). The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients.Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 22:255–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sivik, T. (1988).Dynamisk psykoterapi, del I: Personlighetsutveckling—karaktärsbildning, Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  • Sivik, T. (1990).Dynamisk psykoterapi, del II: Diagnos—psykopatologi—behandlingsteknik, Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  • Sivik, T. (1993). Alexithymia and Hypersensitivity to Touch and Palpation.Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science, 28:(2) 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivik T. and Hösterrey, U. The Thematic Apperception Test as an Aid in Understanding the Psychodynamics of Development of Chronic Idiopathic Pain Syndrome.Psychotherapy Psychosomatics, 57:57–60, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivik, T. (1991) Personality Traits in Patients with Acute Low-Back Pain. A comparison with Chronic Low-Back Pain Patients.Psychoter Psychotherapy Psychosomatics, Sivik T., Gustavsson E., and Klingberg-Olsson K. Differential diagnosis of low-back pain patients; A simple quantification of the pain drawing.Nord J psychiatry 46:55–62, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivik, T. and Delimar D. Characteristics of Patients who attribute chronic pain to minor injury.Scandinavian Journal of Rehailitationb Medicine, 26:27–31, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivik, T., Delimar, N., and Schoenfeld, R. (1998). Two related Tests for the Assessment of Psychosomatic Personality Profile and Coping Style: SPS—Sivik Psychosomatism Test, and OPER—the test of Operationality. Factor Analysis and reliability of the tests.Journal of Clinical Psychology, accepted for publication.

  • Sivik, T., Delimar, N., and Schoenfeld, R. (1999a). Construct Validity of the Sivik Psychosomaticism Test and Test of Operational Style: Convergent and Diuvergent Correlations with Multiphasic Minnesota Personality Inventory (MMPI);Int Phys Beh Sci, pp. 79–84.

  • Sivik, T., Delimar, N., and Schoenfeld, R. (1999b). Construct Validity of the Sivik Psychosomaticism Test and Test of Operational Style: Convergent and Diuvergent Correlations with Toronto Alexithymia Scale—Revised (TAS-R); Submitted for publication

  • Sivik, T., Delimar, N., and Schoenfeld, R. (1999c). Sivik Psychosomaticism Test and Test of Operational Style: Relationship with State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) and Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), Construct Validity of SPS and OPER.Portuguese Journal of Psychosomatics, accepted for publ.

  • Author’s Note: Tatjana Sivik, Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and the Neuroscientific Center, University of Göteborg, Sweden; Natasa Delimar, Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden; Rebecca Schoenfeld, Department of Linguistics and Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California (now at the Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden). Correspondence regarding this article and requests for copies of the SPS and OPER tests as well as for copies of the scale properties of the tests should be directed to Tatjana Sivik, Institute for Psychosomatic Medicine, Kvibergsvägen 5, S-415 04, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivik, T., Delimar, N. & Schoenfeld, R. Construct validity of the Sivik Psychosomaticism test and test of Operational style: Correlations with Karolinska Scheme of Personality. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 34, 71–78 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688712

Keywords

Navigation