Skip to main content

Dutch experience in the utilization of evaluation research: The procedure of reconsideration

Abstract

This article examines evidence for the influence of program evaluation results on political decisionmaking. Dutch practice at central government level is illustrated by an interesting and well documented case: the Reconsideration (Review) Procedure, an annual evaluation process attuned to the budget cycle. Possible implications for the optimalization of the use of evaluatory research are discussed.

Evaluators have emerged from the 20-year embrace (by the real world) more sophisticated about the complexity of their task and more realistic about the political realities that exist in social programs and about how social science information is used in social problem solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bemelmans-Videc, M.L. (1984).Economen in overheidsdienst, Leiden/Rotterdam.

  • Boorsma, P.B. (1988). De financiële revolutie,Bestuur, maandblad voor overheidskunde, 5, 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braam, A. van, & Bemelmans-Videc, M.L. (1986).Leerboek Bestuurskunde. Muiderberg.

  • Braband, W.J. van. (1987). Rekenkameronderzoek en budgetrecht: Een pleidooi voor beleidscrapportages. InMacht en onmacht van bestuurlijke evaluaties (pp. 81–89). Geshriften van de Vereniging voor Bestuurskunde. Congrespublikatie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization.American Behavioral Scientist, 22 (3), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P. (1985). The influence of analysis on U.S. defense policy.Policy Sciences, 20(2) 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koogerwerf, A. (1986).Vanaf de top gezien. Visies van de politieke elite, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviton, L. C. & Hughes, E. F. X. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis.Evaluation Review, 5(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niekerk, N. C. M. van. (1987). Heroverwegingsoperatie 1981 en het ambacht van het ombuigen.Openbae Uitgaven.13(5), 216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nispen, F. K. M. van. (1987). De neroverweging: Informatie is macht. InMachten onmacht van bestuurlijke evaluaties; Geschriften van de Vereniging voor Bestuurskunde, Congrespublikatie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma, J.K.T. (1988). Het concept van de beleidslevenscyclus en de heroverweging.Beleidsanalyse, 2, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1973). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation.Evaluation Comment: The Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3(4), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorber, A., & Schild, J. (1986). Some important experiences with policy analysis and performance budgeting in the Dutch central government.International Review of Administrative Sciences, 52, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjeenk Willink, H.D. (1986). Samenhang grote operaties. In F.K.M. van Nispen P. Noordhoek,De grote operaties Deventer.

  • Verwayen, H. (1984).Policy review and budgeting: Some experiences with the ‘Reconsiderations procedure’ in the Netherlands; OECD-paper.

  • Webber, D. J. (1987). Factors influencing legislators' use of policy information and implications for promoting greater use.Policy Studies Review, 6(4), 666–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1977). Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research.Policy Analysis, 3(4), 521–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H., & Bucuvalas, M.J. (1980).Social science research and decision-making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc was, until recently, associate professor of public administration at the University of Leiden, The Netherlands. She is currently engaged in (meta-) evaluatory research and advisory work at the Dutch supreme audit institution: the General Accounting Chamber. This article in no way reflects the views of the GAC.

He publishing activities cover books and articles related to the science of public administration, the role of professionals in policy-design, and the comparative study of practice and utilization of policy evaluation with European and American governments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bemelmans-Videc, ML. Dutch experience in the utilization of evaluation research: The procedure of reconsideration. Knowledge in Society 2, 31–48 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687232

Keywords

  • Policy Alternative
  • Administrative Process
  • Review Procedure
  • Evaluatory Part
  • Administrative Practice