Abstract
As the field of research utilization grows and differentiates itself, the need for more integrative conceptualization increases as well. In this article, empirical findings on the predictors of conceptual effects of research on practitioners are brought to bear on such a “pluralist” reading of the data, with the objective of explaining more fully how strong effects are achieved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyer, J., & Trice, H. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 591–622.
Buchmann, R. (1987). Reporting and using educational research: Conviction or persuasion. In J. Goodlad (Ed.),The Ecology of School Renewal (pp. 170–191). Chicago, IL: NSSE, University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, L., Sargent, M., & Sechrest, L. (1986). Use of psychotherapy research by professional psychologists.American Psychologist, 41 (2), 198–206.
Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977),l'Acteur et le système, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Cousins, B., & Leithwood, K. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation.Review of Educational Research, 56 (3), 331–364.
Douglas, J. (1976).Investigative social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Dunn, W. (1983). Measuring knowledge use.Knowledge, 4(5), 120–133.
Dunn, W., & Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field.Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 1(1), 3–26.
Glaser, B. (1978).Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, E., Abelson, H., & Garrison, K. (1983).Putting knowledge to use. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Havelock, R. (1969).Planning for innovation through the dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK, Institute for Social Research.
Huberman, M. (1987). Steps toward an integrated model of research utilization.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 586–611.
Huberman, M., Gather-Thürler, M., & Nufer, E. (1988).La mise en practique des recherches scientifiques. Berne: Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. (1988). Assessing local causality in qualitative research. In D. Berg & K. Smith (Eds.),The self in social inquiry (pp. 351–382). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Human Interaction Research Institute. (1976).Putting knowledge to use: A distillation of the literature regarding knowledge transfer and change. Los Angeles, CA: HIRI.
Johnson, K. (1985). Research influence in decision making to control and prevent violence.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 7(2), 161–189.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1977). Policy makers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research in public policy-making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Larsen, J. (1976).Consultation and its outcome. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
Larsen, J. (1982).Information utilization and non-utilization. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
Marsh, D., Glassick, J. (1987). Knowledge utilization in evaluation efforts.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9 (3), 323–341.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Muthard, J., Felice, K. (1982). Assessing activities for the utilization of rehabilitation research.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4(2), 309–328.
O'Reilly, C. (1981). Constraints on evaluation utilization. In A. Bank & R. Williams (Eds.).Evaluation in school districts: Organizational perspectives. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
Pea, R. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem.International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 639–664.
Sabitier, P. (1987). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis.Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
Strauss, A. (1987).Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R., & Moore, G. (1985).The utilization of research: Lessons from the natural hazards field. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Michael Huberman is professor of education at the University of Geneva, Switzerland. His research interests are in adult cognition, knowledge utilization, and qualitative research methodologies. His most recent books areLa Vie des Enseignants (1989) andAssurer la Réussite des Apprentissages Scolaires (1988). He is currently completing a book on research utilizations, also in French, with the provisional title,La Mise en Pratique des Recherches Scientifiques, scheduled for publication in early 1990.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huberman, M. Predicting conceptual effects in research utilization: Looking with both eyes. Knowledge in Society 2, 6–24 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687204
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687204