Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting conceptual effects in research utilization: Looking with both eyes

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge in Society

Abstract

As the field of research utilization grows and differentiates itself, the need for more integrative conceptualization increases as well. In this article, empirical findings on the predictors of conceptual effects of research on practitioners are brought to bear on such a “pluralist” reading of the data, with the objective of explaining more fully how strong effects are achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyer, J., & Trice, H. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, R. (1987). Reporting and using educational research: Conviction or persuasion. In J. Goodlad (Ed.),The Ecology of School Renewal (pp. 170–191). Chicago, IL: NSSE, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Sargent, M., & Sechrest, L. (1986). Use of psychotherapy research by professional psychologists.American Psychologist, 41 (2), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977),l'Acteur et le système, Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, B., & Leithwood, K. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation.Review of Educational Research, 56 (3), 331–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. (1976).Investigative social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. (1983). Measuring knowledge use.Knowledge, 4(5), 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W., & Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field.Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 1(1), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978).Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, E., Abelson, H., & Garrison, K. (1983).Putting knowledge to use. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. (1969).Planning for innovation through the dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1987). Steps toward an integrated model of research utilization.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 586–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., Gather-Thürler, M., & Nufer, E. (1988).La mise en practique des recherches scientifiques. Berne: Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., & Miles, M. (1988). Assessing local causality in qualitative research. In D. Berg & K. Smith (Eds.),The self in social inquiry (pp. 351–382). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Interaction Research Institute. (1976).Putting knowledge to use: A distillation of the literature regarding knowledge transfer and change. Los Angeles, CA: HIRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1985). Research influence in decision making to control and prevent violence.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 7(2), 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1977). Policy makers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research in public policy-making. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. (1976).Consultation and its outcome. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. (1982).Information utilization and non-utilization. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., Glassick, J. (1987). Knowledge utilization in evaluation efforts.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9 (3), 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthard, J., Felice, K. (1982). Assessing activities for the utilization of rehabilitation research.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4(2), 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C. (1981). Constraints on evaluation utilization. In A. Bank & R. Williams (Eds.).Evaluation in school districts: Organizational perspectives. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem.International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 639–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabitier, P. (1987). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis.Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1987).Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., & Moore, G. (1985).The utilization of research: Lessons from the natural hazards field. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Michael Huberman is professor of education at the University of Geneva, Switzerland. His research interests are in adult cognition, knowledge utilization, and qualitative research methodologies. His most recent books areLa Vie des Enseignants (1989) andAssurer la Réussite des Apprentissages Scolaires (1988). He is currently completing a book on research utilizations, also in French, with the provisional title,La Mise en Pratique des Recherches Scientifiques, scheduled for publication in early 1990.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huberman, M. Predicting conceptual effects in research utilization: Looking with both eyes. Knowledge in Society 2, 6–24 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687204

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687204

Keywords

Navigation