Skip to main content
Log in

The political practice of genetic epistemology

  • The Social Sciences and Development Theory
  • Published:
Studies In Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic epistemology is sometimes taken by those unfamiliar with it as a justification for a meritocracy of moral reasoning and the continued oppression of people employing reasoning at lower stages than those who seek to perpetuate the oppression. Whether this interpretation is praised or reviled, it remains erroneous. In particular, this misunderstanding is applied to attempts by genetic epistemologists to apply its insights to the construction of the larger social world. However, a genetic-epistemological politics is really characterized by a concern for maintaining systems permitting free discourse among moral agents. This article outlines the nature of the erroneous interpretations and discusses genetic epistemology's proper application to politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BENHABIB, SEYLA 1986 The generalized and the concrete other: the Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory.Praxis International 4, no. 4 (January): 402–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERTI, ANNA EMILIA, ANNA SILVIA BOMBI and ROSSANA DE BENE 1986 Acquiring economic notions: Profit.International Journal of Behavioral Development 9:15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BERTI, ANNA EMILIA, ANNA SILVIA BOMBI and ADRIANA LIS 1982 The child's conceptions about means of production and their owners.European Journal of Social Psychology 12:221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRUBAKER, STANLEY C. 1988 Can liberals punish?American Political Science Review 82(3):821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHILTON, STEPHEN 1988a Any complete theory of social change inevitably incorporates a normatively grounded theory of moral choice.Journal of Developing Societies 4, no. 2 (July–October): 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHILTON, STEPHEN 1988b [Review Essay:] Conceptualizing political development. Mimeo, Political Science Department, University of Minnesota-Duluth.

  • — 1988c Defining political culture.Western Political Quarterly 41, no. 3 (September): 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1988dDefining political development. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOMSKY, NOAM 1975Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLBY, ANN and LAWRENCE KOHLBERG 1987The measurement of moral judgment. Two Volumes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLBY, ANN, LAWRENCE KOHLBERG, JOHN GIBBS and MARCUS LIEBERMAN 1983A longitudinal study of moral judgment.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48(1) Serial No. 200.

  • DASEN, PIERRE 1977Piagetian psychology. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, CAROLYN 1975 Societal complexity and moral development: A Kenyan study.Ethos 3:505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FISHKIN, JAMES 1982Beyond subjective morality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLAVELL, JOHN H. 1963The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKENA, WILLIAM K. 1963Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRASER, NANCY 1986 Toward a discourse ethic of solidarity.Praxis International 5, no. 4 (January): 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIERE, PAULO 1970 Pedagogy of the oppressed. InThe political economy of development and underdevelopment (4th edition), edited by Charles K. Wilbur. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • GABLIK, SUZI 1977Progress in art. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIBBS, JOHN 1977 Kohlberg's stages of moral judgment: A constructive critique.Harvard Educational Review 47:43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • GILLIGAN, CAROL 1977 In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality.Harvard Educational Review 47 (November):481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1982In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GILLIGAN, CAROL and J. M. MURPHY 1979 Development from adolescence to adulthood: The philosopher and the “Dilemma of the Fact”. InIntellectual development beyond childhood, edited by D. Kuhn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERMAS, JUERGEN 1975Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1979Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983 Interpretive social science vs. hermeneuticism. InSocial science as moral inquiry. edited by Norma Haan, Robert N. Bellah, Paul Rabinow, and William M. Sullivan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESS, ROBERT D. and JUDITH V. TORNEY 1967The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIGGINS, E. TORY, DIANE RUBLE, and WILLARD HARTUP 1983Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JACKINS, HARVEY 1981The art of listening. Seattle: Rational Island Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOFFKA, K. 1935Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHLBERG, LAWRENCE, ed. 1981Essays in moral development: Vol. I. The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 1984Essays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984a Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. InEssays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHLBERG, LAWRENCE, CHARLES LEVINE and ALEXANDRA HEWER 1984a The current formulation of the theory. InEssays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1984b Synopses and detailed replies to critics. InEssays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVI-STRAUSS, CLAUDE 1963Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIPSKY, SUZANNE 1987Internalized racism. Seattle: Rational Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARCUSE, HERBERT 1965 Repressive tolerance. InA critique of pure tolerance. Edited by Robert Paul Wolff, Barrington Moore, Jr. and Herbert Marcuse. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MURPHY, J. M. and CAROL GILLIGAN 1980 Moral development in later adolescence and adulthood: A critique and reconstruction of Kohlberg's theory.Human Development 23:77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISAN, MORDECAL and LAWRENCE KOHLBERG 1984 Cultural universality of moral judgment stages: A longitudinal study in Turkey. InEssays in moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • OVERTON, WILLIS F. 1983The relationship between social and cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • PALMER, MONTE 1989Dilemmas of political development 4th edition. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARENTI, MICHAEL 1978Power and the powerless. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1986Inventing reality: The politics of the mass media. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARSONS, MICHAEL J. 1987How we understand art: A congnitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIAGET, JEAN 1932The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1970Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAWLS, JOHN 1971A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSENBERG, SHAWN, DANA WARD and STEPHEN CHILTON 1988Political reasoning and cognition: A Piagetian view. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SELMAN, ROBERT 1972 The relation of role-taking to the development of moral judgment in children.Child Development 42:79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHWEDER, R. 1982 Review of Lawrence Kohlberg'sEssays on moral development, Volume I: The philosophy of moral development.Contemporary Psychology 27(6):421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, ELIZABETH LEONIE 1974 Moral development research: A case study of scientific cultural bias.Human Development 17:81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNAREY, JOHN, JOSEPH REIMER and LAWRENCE KOHLBERG 1984 Cultural universality of moral judgment stages: A longitudinal study in Israel. In —Kohlberg 1984:594–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • SULLIVAN, E. V. 1977 A study of Kohlberg's structural theory of moral development: A critique of liberal social science ideology.Human Development 20:352–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VYGOTSKY, LEV 1978Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WALKER, L. J. 1982 Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal.

  • WEINREICH, HELEN 1977 Some consequences of replicating Kohlberg's original moral development study on a British sample.Journal of Moral Education 7(1):32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Stephen chilton is assistant professor of political science at the University of Minnesota at Duluth, where he specializes in conceptual analysis in the fields of comparative politics and political psychology. He is the author ofDefining Political Development (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1988);Grounding Political Development (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1991); and (with Shawn Rosenberg and Dana Ward) ofPolitical Reasoning and Cognition: A Piagetian View (Duke University Press, 1988).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chilton, S. The political practice of genetic epistemology. Studies in Comparative International Development 25, 3–23 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687163

Keywords

Navigation