Skip to main content
Log in

The chinese brain drain and policy options

  • Development Research
  • Published:
Studies In Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brain drain has become a growing problem in China’s overseas education, especially since the Tiananmen incident of June 1989. Many students have found it more difficult to adjust to the home environment. Some are afraid they would be punished for political reasons if they went home. Some use the issue as an opportunity to seek permanent overseas residence.

Beijing is facing various difficulties in coping with the brain drain problem. Restrictions always anger students abroad. Family members often discourage students from returning. Incentives to attract students to return are inadequate. Most important, after Tiananmen Western governments refused to cooperate with Beijing and allowed Chinese students to stay.

Concerned with the brain drain, Beijing is reconsidering its policy on foreign study. Of the policy alternatives, a continuation of the open policy appears to remain optimal, though some adjustments are necessary. In addition, several technical solutions to the brain drain problem are worth considering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Chang is professor of political science and director of the Center for East Asian Studies at the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Deng is a research associate of the Center. His most recent publication isChina’s Brain Drain Problem: Causes, Consequences and Policy Options, and he is the author of several articles included in edited books and scholarly journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, P., Deng, Z. The chinese brain drain and policy options. Studies in Comparative International Development 27, 44–60 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687104

Keywords

Navigation