Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the scattered and diffuse literature on the tolerance of ambiguity construct (AT). The work by Frenkel-Brunswik (1948) is considered in some detail to help explain the origin of the concept as well as its diffusion to many areas of psychology. Second, thirty years of correlational research, which looks at the studies correlating AT measures with a variety of psychological variables, are reviewed. Third, evidence for the differential distribution of AT among particular groups is reviewed. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the various self-report AT measures are considered in some detail. The two final sections look at organizational and cultural correlates of AT (the areas currently most interested in the AT concept). The conclusion attempts to explain varying patterns of interest in the AT construct and its current status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S., & Schwartz, A. (1992). Intolerance of ambiguity and depression.Social Cognition, 10, 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S., & Cummings, L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, J. (1989). Learning effects while passively viewing the necker.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1391–1394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Herold, D., & Ashford, S. (1990). The effects of tolerance for ambiguity on feedback-seeking behavior.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, L. (1970). Leadership preference as a function of authoritarianism and intolerance of ambiguity.Psychologia, 13, 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, L., & Amal, S. (1986). A situational test of intolerance ambiguity.Psychologia, 29, 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Block, J. (1950). Intolerance of ambiguity. and ethnocentrism.Journal of Personality, 19, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochner, S. (1965). Defining intolerance of ambiguity.Psychological Record, 15, 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. (1955). Ambiguity as a therapeutic variable.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable.Journal of Personality, 30, 29–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chabassol, D., & Thomas, D. (1975). Needs for structure, tolerance of ambiguity and dogmatism in adolescents.Psychological Reports, 37, 507–510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. (1967). Effect of need for approval and intolerance of ambiguity upon stimulus preference.Journal of Personality, 35: 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, S., Yates, J., & Abrams, R. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance.Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 38, 230–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davids, A. (1955). Some personality and intellectual correlates of intolerance of ambiguity.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43: 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M. (1983). Use of Budner’s intolerance of ambiguity measure for entrepreneurial research.Psychological Reports, 53, 1019–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draguns, S. & Multari, G. (1961). Recognition of perceptual ambiguous stimuli in grade school children.Child Development, 32, 541–555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, K., & Spear, P. (1980). Preference and performance on two tasks of varying ambiguity as a function of ambiguity tolerance.Australian Journal of Psychology, 32, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, D. (1957). Expressed confidence level uncertainty about subsequent information and “intolerance of ambiguity.” Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Minnesota.

  • Ehrlich, D. (1965). “Intolerance of Ambiguity.” Walk’s A Scale: Historical comment.Psychological Reports, 17, 591–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1954).The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. (1964). Acceptance and rejection of statements in relation to attitude strength, critical ability and intolerance of inconsistency.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. (1967). An expectancy-value model of information-seeking behaviour.Psychological Review, 74, 342–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. (1969). Preference for information in relation to consistency, novelty, intolerance of ambiguity and dogmatism.Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxman, P. (1976). Tolerance for ambiguity and self-actualizing.Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1948). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional perceptual personality variable.Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Tolerance towards ambiguity as a personality variable.American Psychologist, 3, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1951). Personality theory and perception. In R. Blake & G. Ramsey (Eds.),Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. (1990). Intolerance of ambiguity as a moderator of the occupational role stress-strain relationship.Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1990).The Protestant work ethic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1994). A content, correlational and factor analytic study of four tolerance of ambiguity questionnaires.Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1993).Corporate assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellere, G., Faden, R., & Levine, D. (1990). Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students.Social Science and Medicine, 31, 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J., Romero, P., & Petersen, C. (1978). Effects of a simulation game upon tolerance for ambiguity, dogmatism and risk taking.Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. (1957). Perceptual and personality dynamics in reactions to ambiguity.British Journal of Psychology, 48, 200–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, D. (1973). Professional employees’ preference for upward mobility.Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D., Block, J., & Block, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity in preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 14, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. (1972). Tolerance for ambiguity in late adolescent males.Developmental Psychology, 7, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984).Cultures’ consequences. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaensch, E. (1938).Der Gegentypus. Leipzig. Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J., & McBain, G. (1979). Effects of Type A behaviour, intolerance of ambiguity, stress and work-related outcomes and locus of control on the relationship between roles.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H., & Barclay, J. (1963). The specificity of intolerance of ambiguity measures.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D., & Ginsberg, R. (1985). The specificity of intolerance of ambiguity measures.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M. (1981). A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity.Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 407–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreitler, S., Maguen, T., & Kreitler, H. (1975). The three faces of intolerance of ambiguity.Archiv für Psychologie, 127, 238–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lysonski, S., & Andrews, J. (1990). Effect of moderating variables on product managers’ behaviour.Psychological Reports, 66, 295–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity.Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1953). Intolerance of ambiguity in interpersonal and perceptual behaviour.Journal of Personality, 22, 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matterson, M., & Ivancevich, J. (1987).Controlling working stress: Effective human resource and management strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandless, B., & Holloway, H. (1955). Race prejudice and intolerance of ambiguity in children.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 692–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1961).The achieving society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, K. (1983). Opinion-related information seeking: Personal and situational variables.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Million, T. (1957) Authoritarianism, intolerance of ambiguity and rigidity under ego- and task-involving conditions.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 99, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muss, R. (1959). A comparison of “high causally” and “low causally” oriented sixth grade children in respect to a perceptual “intolerance of ambiguity tests.”Child Development, 31, 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 607–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. (1993). Flexible decision styles and the choices of top executives.Journal of Management Studies, 30, 695–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (1952). Ethnocentrism, “intolerance of ambiguity” and abstract reasoning ability.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 526–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlicki, R., & Almquist, C. (1973). Authoritarianism, locus of control and tolerance of ambiguity as reflected in membership and non-membership in a women’s liberation group.Psychological Reports, 32, 1331–1337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D., & Chasen, M. (1980). Intolerance of ambiguity and life status during early adulthood.Psychological Reports, 47, 388–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D., Moss, S., & Cross, W. (1978). Budner’s intolerance of ambiguity: A note concerning intelligence.Psychological Reports, 43, 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D., & Xelowski, H. (1981). Adolescents’ anxiety and intolerance of ambiguity scores as predictors of dropping out of a study.Psychological Reports, 48, 229–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1951). Prejudice, concreteness of thinking and reification of thinking.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, S. (1957). Ethnocentrism and intolerance of ambiguity in mentally retarded children.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52: 567–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskin, R., & Margerison, C. (1983). The effectiveness of some measures of managerial effectiveness.Human Relations, 36, 865–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, N. & O’Connell, A. (1982). The relationships among sex-role orientation, cognitive complexity and tolerance for ambiguity.Sex Roles, 8, 1209–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, S. (1966). Tolerance of ambiguity and semantic differential ratings.Psychological Reports, 19, 1303–1312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, S., & Rosen, E. (1966). Measurement and some correlates of need cognition.Psychological Reports, 19, 139–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (1955, October).Some preliminary interpretive material (for the PRI Research Memorandum SS). Educational Testing Service.

  • Schere, J. (1982). Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. InProceedings, pp. 404–407. New York: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., & Hendrick, C. (1974). Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reliance to cognitive inconsistency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 601–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., Hendrick, C., Regula, C., & Freconna, J. (1973). Interactive effects of ambiguity tolerance and task effort of dissonance reduction.Journal of Personality, 41, 224–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, H. (1975). Personality adjustment as a function of interaction between locus of evaluation and tolerance of ambiguity.Psychological Reports, 37, 1204–1206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanuis, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis.European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smock, C. (1955). The influence of stress on “intolerance of ambiguity.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatzel, M. (1980). Tolerance for ambiguity in adult college students.Psychological Reports, 47, 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegano, D. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity.Psychological Reports, 66, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, J. (1993). Tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty audit qualifications and bankers’ perceptions.Psychological Reports, 72, 915.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London

    Adrian Furnham & Tracy Ribchester

Authors
  1. Adrian Furnham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy Ribchester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furnham, A., Ribchester, T. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology 14, 179–199 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907

Keywords

Search

Navigation