Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications

Abstract

This paper reviews the scattered and diffuse literature on the tolerance of ambiguity construct (AT). The work by Frenkel-Brunswik (1948) is considered in some detail to help explain the origin of the concept as well as its diffusion to many areas of psychology. Second, thirty years of correlational research, which looks at the studies correlating AT measures with a variety of psychological variables, are reviewed. Third, evidence for the differential distribution of AT among particular groups is reviewed. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the various self-report AT measures are considered in some detail. The two final sections look at organizational and cultural correlates of AT (the areas currently most interested in the AT concept). The conclusion attempts to explain varying patterns of interest in the AT construct and its current status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, S., & Schwartz, A. (1992). Intolerance of ambiguity and depression.Social Cognition, 10, 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashford, S., & Cummings, L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beer, J. (1989). Learning effects while passively viewing the necker.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1391–1394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, N., Herold, D., & Ashford, S. (1990). The effects of tolerance for ambiguity on feedback-seeking behavior.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhushan, L. (1970). Leadership preference as a function of authoritarianism and intolerance of ambiguity.Psychologia, 13, 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhushan, L., & Amal, S. (1986). A situational test of intolerance ambiguity.Psychologia, 29, 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Block, J., & Block, J. (1950). Intolerance of ambiguity. and ethnocentrism.Journal of Personality, 19, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bochner, S. (1965). Defining intolerance of ambiguity.Psychological Record, 15, 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bordin, E. (1955). Ambiguity as a therapeutic variable.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 9–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable.Journal of Personality, 30, 29–59.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chabassol, D., & Thomas, D. (1975). Needs for structure, tolerance of ambiguity and dogmatism in adolescents.Psychological Reports, 37, 507–510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crandall, J. (1967). Effect of need for approval and intolerance of ambiguity upon stimulus preference.Journal of Personality, 35: 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curley, S., Yates, J., & Abrams, R. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance.Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 38, 230–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davids, A. (1955). Some personality and intellectual correlates of intolerance of ambiguity.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43: 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dollinger, M. (1983). Use of Budner’s intolerance of ambiguity measure for entrepreneurial research.Psychological Reports, 53, 1019–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Draguns, S. & Multari, G. (1961). Recognition of perceptual ambiguous stimuli in grade school children.Child Development, 32, 541–555.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ebeling, K., & Spear, P. (1980). Preference and performance on two tasks of varying ambiguity as a function of ambiguity tolerance.Australian Journal of Psychology, 32, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrlich, D. (1957). Expressed confidence level uncertainty about subsequent information and “intolerance of ambiguity.” Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Minnesota.

  19. Ehrlich, D. (1965). “Intolerance of Ambiguity.” Walk’s A Scale: Historical comment.Psychological Reports, 17, 591–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eysenck, H. (1954).The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feather, N. (1964). Acceptance and rejection of statements in relation to attitude strength, critical ability and intolerance of inconsistency.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feather, N. (1967). An expectancy-value model of information-seeking behaviour.Psychological Review, 74, 342–360.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feather, N. (1969). Preference for information in relation to consistency, novelty, intolerance of ambiguity and dogmatism.Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Foxman, P. (1976). Tolerance for ambiguity and self-actualizing.Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 67–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1948). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional perceptual personality variable.Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Tolerance towards ambiguity as a personality variable.American Psychologist, 3, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1951). Personality theory and perception. In R. Blake & G. Ramsey (Eds.),Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frone, M. (1990). Intolerance of ambiguity as a moderator of the occupational role stress-strain relationship.Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Furnham, A. (1990).The Protestant work ethic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Furnham, A. (1994). A content, correlational and factor analytic study of four tolerance of ambiguity questionnaires.Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1993).Corporate assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gellere, G., Faden, R., & Levine, D. (1990). Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students.Social Science and Medicine, 31, 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glover, J., Romero, P., & Petersen, C. (1978). Effects of a simulation game upon tolerance for ambiguity, dogmatism and risk taking.Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hamilton, V. (1957). Perceptual and personality dynamics in reactions to ambiguity.British Journal of Psychology, 48, 200–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harlow, D. (1973). Professional employees’ preference for upward mobility.Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrington, D., Block, J., & Block, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity in preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 14, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heilbrun, A. (1972). Tolerance for ambiguity in late adolescent males.Developmental Psychology, 7, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hofstede, G. (1984).Cultures’ consequences. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jaensch, E. (1938).Der Gegentypus. Leipzig. Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Keenan, J., & McBain, G. (1979). Effects of Type A behaviour, intolerance of ambiguity, stress and work-related outcomes and locus of control on the relationship between roles.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kelman, H., & Barclay, J. (1963). The specificity of intolerance of ambiguity measures.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kenny, D., & Ginsberg, R. (1985). The specificity of intolerance of ambiguity measures.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kirton, M. (1981). A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity.Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 407–415.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kreitler, S., Maguen, T., & Kreitler, H. (1975). The three faces of intolerance of ambiguity.Archiv für Psychologie, 127, 238–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lysonski, S., & Andrews, J. (1990). Effect of moderating variables on product managers’ behaviour.Psychological Reports, 66, 295–306.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MacDonald, A. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity.Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Martin, B. (1953). Intolerance of ambiguity in interpersonal and perceptual behaviour.Journal of Personality, 22, 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Matterson, M., & Ivancevich, J. (1987).Controlling working stress: Effective human resource and management strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McCandless, B., & Holloway, H. (1955). Race prejudice and intolerance of ambiguity in children.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 692–693.

    Google Scholar 

  50. McClelland, D. (1961).The achieving society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. McPherson, K. (1983). Opinion-related information seeking: Personal and situational variables.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Million, T. (1957) Authoritarianism, intolerance of ambiguity and rigidity under ego- and task-involving conditions.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 99, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Muss, R. (1959). A comparison of “high causally” and “low causally” oriented sixth grade children in respect to a perceptual “intolerance of ambiguity tests.”Child Development, 31, 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Norton, R. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 607–619.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nutt, P. (1993). Flexible decision styles and the choices of top executives.Journal of Management Studies, 30, 695–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. O’Connor, P. (1952). Ethnocentrism, “intolerance of ambiguity” and abstract reasoning ability.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 526–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pawlicki, R., & Almquist, C. (1973). Authoritarianism, locus of control and tolerance of ambiguity as reflected in membership and non-membership in a women’s liberation group.Psychological Reports, 32, 1331–1337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Raphael, D., & Chasen, M. (1980). Intolerance of ambiguity and life status during early adulthood.Psychological Reports, 47, 388–390.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Raphael, D., Moss, S., & Cross, W. (1978). Budner’s intolerance of ambiguity: A note concerning intelligence.Psychological Reports, 43, 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Raphael, D., & Xelowski, H. (1981). Adolescents’ anxiety and intolerance of ambiguity scores as predictors of dropping out of a study.Psychological Reports, 48, 229–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rokeach, M. (1951). Prejudice, concreteness of thinking and reification of thinking.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rosenblum, S. (1957). Ethnocentrism and intolerance of ambiguity in mentally retarded children.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52: 567–573.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Roskin, R., & Margerison, C. (1983). The effectiveness of some measures of managerial effectiveness.Human Relations, 36, 865–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rotter, N. & O’Connell, A. (1982). The relationships among sex-role orientation, cognitive complexity and tolerance for ambiguity.Sex Roles, 8, 1209–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rydell, S. (1966). Tolerance of ambiguity and semantic differential ratings.Psychological Reports, 19, 1303–1312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rydell, S., & Rosen, E. (1966). Measurement and some correlates of need cognition.Psychological Reports, 19, 139–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Saunders, D. (1955, October).Some preliminary interpretive material (for the PRI Research Memorandum SS). Educational Testing Service.

  68. Schere, J. (1982). Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. InProceedings, pp. 404–407. New York: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shaffer, D., & Hendrick, C. (1974). Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reliance to cognitive inconsistency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 601–608.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shaffer, D., Hendrick, C., Regula, C., & Freconna, J. (1973). Interactive effects of ambiguity tolerance and task effort of dissonance reduction.Journal of Personality, 41, 224–233.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shavit, H. (1975). Personality adjustment as a function of interaction between locus of evaluation and tolerance of ambiguity.Psychological Reports, 37, 1204–1206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sidanuis, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis.European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Smock, C. (1955). The influence of stress on “intolerance of ambiguity.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Tatzel, M. (1980). Tolerance for ambiguity in adult college students.Psychological Reports, 47, 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tegano, D. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity.Psychological Reports, 66, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tsui, J. (1993). Tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty audit qualifications and bankers’ perceptions.Psychological Reports, 72, 915.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Furnham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furnham, A., Ribchester, T. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology 14, 179–199 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907

Download citation

Keywords

  • Current Psychology
  • Uncertainty Avoidance
  • Psychological Report
  • Role Ambiguity
  • Ambiguous Situation