Skip to main content
Log in

Central issue importance as a function of gender and ethnicity

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent theoretical model of centrality (Bernstein, 1987; Bernstein, Hofmann, Santiago, & Diebolt, 1989) suggests that the importance attached to certain “central issues” may increase the vulnerability of individuals to distress and depression, and may explain the differential rates of depression among gender, racial, and ethnic groups. The present study was designed to examine the importance of central issues as reported by Anglo, Black, and Hispanic men and women (N=169). Multivariate analyses revealed significant gender, ethnicity, and gender X ethnicity effects. Specifically, women considered Intimacy significantly more important than did men, whereas men attached more importance than women to Affiliation. Anglos rated Achievement significantly higher than did Hispanics and Blacks; Hispanics considered Affiliation more important than the other two groups; and Blacks considered Intimacy the least important among the groups. Moreover, Hispanic men attributed significantly greater importance to Change, Adventure, and Control, whereas Hispanic women attached the least significance among all the groups to Control. The results are discussed in terms of cultural influences on sex role orientation and central issues, and the process by which culture and ethnicity may be related to vulnerability to depression and distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A.T. (1967).Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A.T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979).Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belle, D. (1984). Inequality and mental health: Low income and minority women. In L. Walker (Ed.),Women and mental health policy (pp. 135–150). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B.L. (1987)Centrality: An integrative theory of cognitive appraisal. Unpublished manuscript. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B.L., Santiago, A., & Fitzsimmons, P. (1991, March).Distress: Interactive effects of central issues and negative life events. Paper to be presented to the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Bernstein, B.L., Fitzsimmons, P., & Weber, W. (1990, August).The relationship of central issue importance to depression. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Bernstein, B.L., Hofmann, B., Santiago, A., & Diebolt, A. (1989, August).Development and preliminary validation of the Scale of Central Issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Blazer, D. (1985). Psychiatric disorders: A rural/urban comparison.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42(7), 651–656.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, P.D., & Mechanic, D. (1983). Sex differences in psychological distress among married people.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 111–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comas-Diaz, L. (1987). Feminist therapy with mainland Puerto Rican women.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas-Diaz, L. (1998). Cross-cultural mental health treatment. In L. Comas-Diaz & E. Griffith (Eds.),Clinical guidelines in cross-cultural mental health. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (1977). Black women. In V. O’Leary (Ed.),Toward understanding women. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N.A., Olinger, L.J., & MacDonald, M.R. (1985) Depressive schemata and the processing of personal and social information. In L. Alloy (Ed.),Cognitive processes in depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marascuilo, L.A., & Levin, J.R. (1970). Appropriate post-hoc comparisons for interaction and nested hypotheses in analysis of variance designs: The elimination of Type IV errors.American Educational Research Journal, 7, 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado de Snyder, V.N. (1987). Factors associated with acculturative stress and depressive symptomatology among married Mexican immigrant women.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senour, M.N. (1977). Psychology of the Chicana. In J.L. Martinez (Ed.),Chicano psychology. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Nuttall, E., Romero-Garcia, I.., & DeLeon, B. (1987). Sex roles and perceptions of femininity and masculinity of Hispanic women: A review of the literature.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, W.A., Kolodny, B., Valle, R., & Hough, R. (1986). Depressive symptoms and their correlates among immigrant Mexican women in the United States.Social Science Medicine, 22, 645–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, W.A., Kolodny, B., & Warheit, G. (1985). Psychoneuroses among Mexican-Americans and other Whites: Prevalence and causes.American Journal of Public Health, 75, 523–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, S.W., & Roberts, R.E. (1982). Use of the SADS-RDC in a tri-ethnic community survey.Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 47–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, N.M., & Klerman, G.L. (1977). Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 98–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernstein, B.L. Central issue importance as a function of gender and ethnicity. Current Psychology 10, 241–252 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686896

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686896

Keywords

Navigation