Skip to main content
Log in

An arabic version of the revised job descriptive index

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An Arabic version of the Revised Job Descriptive Index (including the Job in General scale) was administered to managers (N=153) in a large Saudi oil company. Despite the considerable linguistic and cultural changes involved, the scales remained fairly homogeneous after translation. Observed alphas were: Co-workers, .84; Job in General, .78; Supervision, .78; Promotion, .72; Work Itself, .66; and Pay, .64. These initial findings are promising, but it is clear that additional work will be necessary before the Arabic version achieves the high psychometric standards of the original. Suggestions for improvements are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (1990).User’s manual for the job descriptive index and the job general (JIG) scales. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candell, G., & Roznowski, M. (1984, August).Application of item response theory to a French-Canadian translation of the JDI: Empirical results and substantive implications. Paper presented at the American Psychological meeting, Toronto.

  • deVera, M. (1984, August).Applications of item response theory to measurement equivalence problems with emic and etic concepts from the Philippines. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, Toronto.

  • Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Komocar, J. (1982). Application of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 818–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L., & Mayer, L. J. (1986). Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the Job Descriptive Index into Hebrew.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerberg, R., Hoy, S., & Smith, F. J. (1977). Language, time, and person effects on attitude scale translations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. J., Peters, L. H., and Gordon, S. M. (1978). The measurement of job satisfaction: Current practices and future considerations.Journal of Management, 4, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., Balzer, W., Brannick, M., Chia, W., Eggleston, S., Gibson, W., Johnson, B., Josephson, H., Paul, K., Reilly, C., & Whalen, W. (1987). The revised JDI: A facelift for an old friend.The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 24(4), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969).The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, S. J. (1981). Dimensionality of the Job Descriptive Index.Academy of Management Journal, 24, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maghrabi, A.S., Johnson, D.A. An arabic version of the revised job descriptive index. Current Psychology 14, 47–53 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686873

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686873

Keywords

Navigation