Skip to main content
Log in

Belief systems and coping styles as mediating variables in the relationship between hostility and illness

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationship between hostility, belief systems, coping styles, and illness. Hostility is of interest when considering the stress-illness relationship because it has been associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease as well as general mortality. The results suggest that individuals prone toward hostility are more likely to succumb to illness and adhere to irrational beliefs than individuals not so oriented. In addition, hostile individuals were found to employ different, and perhaps less adaptive, coping styles than their low hostility counterparts. It was concluded that the belief systems and coping styles typically employed by individuals prone toward hostility may be important mediating variables in the relationship between hostility and illness. These factors may also be important to take into account in treatment programs designed to reduce illness risks for such individuals. Finally, this study suggests that stress-induced impairment of health for hostility-prone individuals may begin much earlier than the vast majority of the literature currently suggests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barefoot, J. C., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, R. B., Jr. (1983). Hostility, CHD incidence, and total mortality: A 25-year follow-up study of 255 physicians.Psychosomatic Medicine, 45, 59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C., Williams, R. B., Jr., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Dodge, K. A. (1987). Predicting mortality from scores on the Cook-Medley Scale: A follow-up of 118 lawyers.Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, L., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents.American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (1985). Beliefs and fears underlying Type A behavior: Correlates of time urgency and hostility.Journal of General Psychology, 112, 133–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scale for the MMPI.Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., Zonderman, A. B., McCrae, R. R., & Williams, R. B., Jr. (1986). Cynicism and paranoid alienation in the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale.Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 283–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Defares, B. P. (1982, August).Coping with stress. Paper presented at the Workshop on Heart and Stress. Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

  • Dembroski, T. M., & Costa, P. T., Dr. (1987). Coronary-prone behavior: Components of the Type A pattern and hostility.Journal of Personality, 55, 211–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Herd, J. A., & Shields, J. L. (1983). Perspectives on coronary-prone behavior. In D. S. Krantz, A. Baum, & J. E. Singer (Eds.),Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. 3, pp. 57–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Jr., Haney, T. L. & Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Relationship to angiographic findings.Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 219–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988).Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F., & Ulmer, D. (1984).Treating Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, J. A., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (1986) Irrational beliefs, depression, and anger among college students.Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J., Robbins, C., & Metzner, H. (1982). The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study.American Journal of Epidemiology, 116, 123–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. K. (1986). Psychosocial variables and cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactivity. In K. A. Matthews, S. M. Weiss, T. Detre, T. M. Dembroski, B. Falkner, S. B. Manuck, & R. B. Williams, Jr. (Eds.),Handbook of stress, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease (pp. 207–229). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. K., & Kelley, K. E. (1989). Hostility in employed women: Relation to work and marital experience, social support, stress, and anger expression.Personality and Social Bulletin, 15, 178–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. D., Rosenman, R. H., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1974). Prediction of clinical coronary heart disease by a test for the coronary-prone behavior pattern.New England Journal of Medicine, 290, 1271–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. G. (1969).The irrational beliefs test, Wichita, KN: Test Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., Kuiper, N. A., & Westra, H. A. (1989). Cognitive and affective components of the Type A behavior pattern: Preliminary evidence for a self-worth contingency model.Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. A. (1988). CHD and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman quantitative review.Psychological Bulletin, 104, 373–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Review Panel on Coronary-Prone Behavior and Coronary Heart Disease (1981). Coronary-prone behavior and coronary heart disease: A critical review.Circulation, 63, 1199–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekelle, R. B., Gale, M., Ostfeld, A. M., & Paul, O. (1983). Hostility, risk of coronary heart disease, and mortality.Psychosomatic Medicine, 45, 109–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Frohm, K. D. (1985). What’s so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Ho Scale.Health Psychology, 4, 503–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K. (1990). Cynical hostility as a health risk: Current status and future directions.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderVoort, D. J. (1990). Hostility, coping styles, belief systems, and illness.Dissertation Abstracts International.

  • Vickers, R. R., Jr., Hervig, L. K., Rahe, R. H., & Rosenman, R. H. (1981). Type A behavior pattern and coping and defense.Psychosomatic Medicine, 43, 381–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vingerhoets, A. J., & Flohr, P. J. (1984). Type A behavior and self-reports of coping preferences.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 57, 15–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. B., Jr., Haney, T. L., Lee, K. L., Kong, Y., Blumenthal, J. A., & Whelan, R. E. (1980). Type A behavior, hostility, and coronary atherosclerosis.Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 539–549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandervoort, D.J. Belief systems and coping styles as mediating variables in the relationship between hostility and illness. Current Psychology 11, 226–235 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686842

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686842

Keywords

Navigation