Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on cognitive tuning sets: the expectations of having to transmit or receive information. It is shown that having to transmit information leads to a unified and distorted summary being transmitted, a reluctance to receive additional information, a rejection of inconsistent information, and a shaping of the material to accommodate the anticipated audience. As well, the opinions of the transmitters become polarized. It is argued that the receiver condition is probably not the correct control group to use since the outcome depends on the uncontrolled perceived goals. It is suggested that future research should probably treat the multiple effects of cognitive tuning sets separately. An integrated explanation is given in terms of anticipating the consequences of communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brilhart, B.L. (1965). The relationship between some aspects of communicative speaking and communicative listening.Journal of Communication, 15, 35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T.C., & Fromkin, H.L. (1968). Cognitive tuning set and behavioral receptivity to discrepant information.Journal of Personality, 36, 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1975). What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.R. (1961). Cognitive tuning as a factor affecting impression formation.Journal of Personality, 29, 235–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. (No date). Zajonc’s measures of cognitive structures: Some problems. Unpublished paper, Department of Psychology, Australian National University, lCanberra.

  • Duval, S., & Wicklund, R.A. (1972).A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy.College Composition and Communication, 35, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1973).Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S.G., Harvey J.H., Keithly, L., & Rich, M. (1977). Cognitive tuning, encoding, and the attribution of causality.Memory and Cognition, 5, 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J.H., Harkins, S.G., & Kagehiro, D.K. (1976). Cognitive tung and the attribution of causality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 708–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennigan, K.M., Cook, T.D., & Gruder, C.L. (1982). Cognitive tuning set, source credibility and the temporal persistence of attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T., McCann, C.D., & Fondacaro, R. (1982). The “Communication Game”: Goal-directed encoding and cognitive consequences.Social Cognition, 1, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C., Mischel, W., & Baer, J.S. (1984). Language and person cognition: Effects of communicative set on trait attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1029–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, L.E., & Watts, W.A. (1969). Salience of logical relationships among beliefs as a factor in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.M. (1981). Polarization of response as a function of cognitive tuning set and individual differences.Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1962). The effects of set and discrepancy on impression formation.Journal of Personality, 30, 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Zajonc, R.B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, M.B. (1973). Cognitive tuning and receptivity to novel information.Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 9, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, C., Ross, M., & Conway, M. (1984). Self-persuasion and self-presentation as mediators of anticipatory attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. (1968). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.C. (1974). Audience effects in a communication chain: An instance of ingratiation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M. & Brock, T.C. (1981).Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, F.A. (1974). Cognitive tuning and differentiation of arguments in communication.Human Communication Research, 1, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.A. (1968). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 204–273). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289–338). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P.B., & Knapper, C. (1968).The perception of people and events. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, W.A., & Holt, L.E. (1970). Logical relationships among beliefs and timing as factors in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarkin, K.L., Town, J.P., & Harvey, J.H. (1981). The role of cognitive sets in interpreting and remembering interpersonal events. In J.H. Harvey (Ed.),Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 289–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1955).Structure of the cognitive field. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning and communication.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. & Adelmann, P.K. (1987). cognition and communication: A story of missed opportunities.Social Science Information, 26, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioural Sciences, James Cook University, 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

    B. Guerin

  2. University of Adelaide, Australia

    J. M. Innes

Authors
  1. B. Guerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Innes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Grants Scheme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerin, B., Innes, J.M. Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication. Current Psychology 8, 234–249 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686752

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686752

Keywords

Search

Navigation