This study was designed to investigate subjects’ interest and liking preferences for stimuli varying in type and level of familiarity. Subjects were presented with stimulus material in the form of slides, and were asked to view the slides firstly without instruction, and then twice more in order to rate the material for interest and liking. Half the subjects were asked to rate liking before interest, and half rated interest before liking. Results showed that interest ratings were relatively unaffected by the rating sequence, whereas ratings of liking were affected: when ratings of likingpreceded interest ratings, familiar items were preferred to less familiar items, but when ratings of liking were madeafter interest ratings, ratings of liking for less familiar items were preferred to more familiar items.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Berlyne, D.E. (1970). Novelty, complexity and hedonic value.Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.
Berlyne, D.E. (1974).Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Kirkland, J. (1974a). A subject of interest: Aesthetic pleasure.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 1306.
Kirkland, J. (1974b). Interest and aesthetic pleasure: Support for the inverse-effect.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 882.
Kirkland, J. (1975). Interest and aesthetic pleasure: Further evidence of a sequential effect.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 562.
This study forms part of the work of the Leicester Aesthetics Research Group. The work was supported by a grant from the Research Board, University of Leicester.
About this article
Cite this article
Berryman, J.C. Interest and liking: Further sequential effects. Current Psychology 3, 39–42 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686556
- Sequential Effect
- Stimulus Type
- Rating Sequence
- Rate Liking
- Familiar Stimulus