Advertisement

A half-century of suffrage: New data and a comparative analysis

  • Pamela Paxton
  • Kenneth A. Bollen
  • Deborah M. Lee
  • HyoJoung Kim
Research Forum

Abstract

Even though theories of democracy place emphasis on universal suffrage, little attempt has been made to measure the degree of suffrage in a broad range of countries. This article uses qualitative descriptions of suffrage to develop quantitative measures of suffrage for most countries of the world. We present annual suffrage measures from 1950 to 2000, provide basic descriptive statistics, and document trends in suffrage across the world. We also compare our measure of suffrage to two other measures available for 1968 and 1985.

Keywords

Comparative International Development Qualitative Description Civil Liberty Liberal Democracy Voter Turnout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, Mike, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi and Adam Przeworski. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.”Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Summer): 3–36.Google Scholar
  2. Arat, Zehra F. 1991.Democracy and Human Rights in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, James L. 1995.AMOS 3.5. Chicago: Small Waters.Google Scholar
  4. — 1996. “Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data.” Pp. 243–277 inAdvanced Structure Equation Modeling Issues and Techniques eds. George A. Marcoulides and Randall E. Schumacker. Mahway, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Harold K. and Donna L. Becker, eds. 1986.Handbook of the World’s Police. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.”American Sociological Review 45: 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1998. “Cross-National Indicators of Liberal Democracy, 1950 to 1990.” Codebook. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  8. Bollen, Kenneth A., Robert W. Jackman and Hyojoung Kim. 1997. “A Comparative Analysis of Suffrage, Registration, and Turnout.” University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  9. Central Intelligence Agency. 1992–2000.The World Factbook. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Coppedge, Michael and Wolfgang Reinecke. 1988. “A Scale of Polyarchy.” Pp. 102–125 inFreedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1987–1988, ed. Raymond D. Gastil. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1990. “Measuring Polyarchy.”Studies in Comparative International Development 25, 1: 51–72.Google Scholar
  12. Cutright, Phillips and James A. Wiley. 1969. “Modernization and Political Representation: 1927–1966.”Studies in Comparative International Development 5, 2: 24–40.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, Robert A. 1971.Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. — 1989.Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond, L., J.J. Linz, and S.M. Lipset, eds. 1990.Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. The Europa World Yearbook 2000, vols. I and II. 2000. London: Europa Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Freedom House Survey Team. 1999.Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1998–1999. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  18. Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993.Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hadenius, Axel. 1992.Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hodges, Donald Clark. 1999.The Literate Communist: 150 Years of the Communist Manifesto. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. 1990–1999.The Military Balance. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1985–1999.Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections, Vols. 20–33. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  23. Jackman, Robert W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.”American Political Science Review 81: 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keesing’s Contemporary Archives. Various years. London, England: Keesings Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy.”American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metz, Helen Chapin, ed. 1992.Nigeria: A Country Study. Washington: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  27. Munck, Gerardo and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.”Comparative Political Studies 35: 5–34.Google Scholar
  28. Nelson, Harold D., ed. 1951–1975.The Stateman’s Yearbook. New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, Harold D. ed. 1981.South Africa, A Country Study. Washington, D.C.: American University, Foreign Area Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Okin, Susan M. 1979.Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. The Political Handbook of the World. Various years. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000.Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1952.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, Charles L. and David A. Jodice. 1983.The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators III: 1948–1977. Computer file.Google Scholar
  35. UNESCO. 1990, 1999.Statistical Yearbook. Paris, France: UNESCO and Bernan Press.Google Scholar
  36. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Various years.Demographic Yearbook. New York.Google Scholar
  37. United Nations. 1993.Sex and Age Distribution of the World Populations: 1950–2025, The 1992 Revision. Computer file.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Paxton
  • Kenneth A. Bollen
  • Deborah M. Lee
  • HyoJoung Kim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations