Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The wrong kind of crisis: Why oil booms and busts rarely lead to authoritarian breakdown

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic crisis has been a central catalyst to Third Wave democratic transitions by contributing to authoritarian breakdown, yet crises in oil-exporting states have generally failed to catalyze such breakdowns, which are a crucial precondition to democratization. This article argues that oil wealth produces two distinct political trajectories, depending on its timing relative to the onset of late development. The dominant trajectory in the oil-exporting world is durable authoritarianism which has forestalled all but a few regime collapses. And, when the alternate trajectory produces vulnerable authoritarianism, oil-catalyzed authoritarian breakdown tends to generate new authoritarian regimes. I use case materials from Iran and Indonesia during the 1960s and 1970s to illustrate the two oil-based trajectories, and I conduct a broader test of the theory against data for 21 oil-exporting, developing countries, which provides suggestive support for a two-path theory of oil-based aturhoritarian persistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afkhami, Gholam Reza Afkhami. 1985.The Iranian Revolution: Thanatos on a National Scale (Washington, D.C.: The Middle East Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001.Siyasat va Siyasatgozari-I Eqtesadi dar Iran, 1350–1360 (Ideology, Politics, and Process in Iran’s Economic Development, 1960–1970). Bethesda: Foundation for Iranian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amuzegar, Jahangir. 2001.Managing the Oil Wealth: OPEC’s Windfalls and Pitfalls. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antlöv, Hans. 1995.Exemplary Centre, Administrative Periphery: Rural Leadership and the New Order in Java. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, Richard. 1989. “The Internal Determinants of Eight Oil-Exporting Countries’ Resource-Based Industry Performance.”Journal of Development Studies 25, 3: 354–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990.Resource-Based Industrialization: Sowing the Oil in Eight Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, Richard. 1998. “Resource Abundance and Economic Development.” UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research.

  • Bachtiar, Harsja. 1968. “Indonesia.” In Donald K. Emmerson, ed.Students and Politics in Developing Nation. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank Markazi Iran. 1977.Guzaresh-i, Salanih va Taraznamih (Annual Report and Balance Sheet), 1349–1355/1970–76.

  • Bates, Robert. 1981.Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Lois. 1990.Nomad: A Year in the Life of a Qashqa’i, Tribesman in Iran. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellin, Eva. 2002.Stalled Democracy: Capital, Labor, and the Paradox of State-Sponsored Development. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.”Comparative Politics 36, 2: 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biro Pusat Statistik Indonesia. Various Years.Statistik Keuangan (Financial Statistics).

  • Boileau, Julian M. 1983.GOLKAR: Functional Group Politics in Indonesia. Jakarta: CSIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, John. 1993.Managing Indonesia: The Modern Political Economy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahyono, Heru. 1992.Peranan Ulama Dalam GOLKAR 1971–1980: Dari Pemilu Sampai Malari (The Role of the Islamic Scholars in GOLKAR 1971–1980: From the General Election to the January 15 Disaster). Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, Kiren Aziz. 1997.The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John. 1997. “Petro-Politics in Congo.”Journal of Democracy 8, 3 (July): 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, Ronald. 2002. “After the Massacre: Mobilization in the Wake of Harsh Repression.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.

  • Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.”American Political Science Review 89, 4 (December): 882–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1994.Politican’s Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999a. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty, Years?”Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1999b. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Americal Political Science Association, Atlanta, 1999.

  • Goodell, Grace. 1986.The Elementary Structures of Political Life: Rural Development in Pahlavi Iran. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995.The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariyadhie. 1997.Perspektif Gerakan Mahasiswa 1978 Dalam Percaturan Politik Nasional (Perspectives on the Student Movement of 1978 in the Political Arena). Jakarta: PT Golden Terayon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968.Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, Osvaldo. 1982.Political Power in Ecuador. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, Anita. 1993.Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador, 1972–1992. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karklins, Rasma and Roger Petersen. 1993. “Decision Calculus of Protesters and Regimes: Eastern Europe 1989.”The Journal of Politics 55, 3 (August): 588–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Terry. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty:Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. “The Perils of the Petro-State: Reflections on the Paradox of Plenty.”Journal of International Affairs 53, 1 (Fall): 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karshenas, Massoud Karshenas. 1990.Oil, State, and Industrialization in Iran. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, Charles. 1992. “Structure and Agency in the Iranian Revolution of 1979.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 1988.Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1987. “Deterrence of Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Represion and Dissent.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 31, 2 (June): 266–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limongi, Fernando and Adam Przeworski. 1994. “Democracy and Development in South America, 1946–1988.” unpublished manuscript.

  • Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996.Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciani, Giacomo. 1994. “The Oil Rent, the Fiscal Crisis of the State and Democratization.” Pp. 130–52. inDemocracy without Democrats? The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World, ed. G. Salame. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. “Allocation vs. Production States: A theoretical Perspective.” Pp. 63–82 inThe Rentier State, eds. H. Beblawi and G. Luciani. London and New York: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, Jamie and Andrew MacIntyre. 1994. “Politics of New Order Indonesia.” Pp. 1–53 inIndonesia’s New Order: The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Transformation, ed. Hal Hill. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavy, H. 1970. “The Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran.” Pp. 428–67 inStudies in the Economic History of the Middle East. ed. M.A. Cook London: Oxford University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas’oed, Mochtar 1983.The Indonesian Economy and Political Structure during the Early New Order, 1966–1971. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.

  • Migdal, Joel S. 1988.Strong Societies and Weak States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, Abbas Milani. 2000.The Persian Sphinx: Amir Abbas Hoveyda and the Riddle of the Iranian Revolution. Washington, D.C.: Mage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi, J. 1978. “The Rastakhiz Party: A Year after Its Creation.”Indian Political Science Review 12: 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najmabadi, Afsaneh. 1987. “Depoliticisation of a Rentier State.” Pp. 211–227 inThe Rentier State, eds. Hazem Beblawi and Giacomo Luciani. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, Vali R. 2000. “Politics Within the Late Pahlavi State: The Ministry of Economy and Industrial Policy, 1963–69.”International Journal of Middle East Studies 32, 1 (February): 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter Opp, and Wolfgang Roehl. 1990. “Repression, Micromobilization, and Political Protest.”Social Forces 69, 2 (December): 521–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavi, Mohammed Reza. N. d.Inqilab-i Safid (The White Revolution). Tehran: Intisharat-i Kayhan.

  • Parsa, Misagh. 1994. “Mosque of Last Resort: State Reform and Social Conflict in the Early 1960s,” Pp. 135–59 in.A Century of Revolution: Social Movements in Iran, ed. John Foran. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasler, Karen. 1996. “Concessions Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61, 1. (February): 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, David. 1985.GOLKAR of Indonesia: An Alternative to the Party System. Singapore and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Indonesia,Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1974 Tentang, Pokokpokok Pemerintahan di Daerah (Law No. 5 1974 Regarding Principles of Governance in the Regions). Jakarta.

  • Rotblat, Howard. 1972. Stability and Change in an Iranian Provincial Bazaar. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Chicago.

  • Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?.” World Politics 53 (April): 325–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Barry. 1986. “Iran’s Revolution and U.S. Policy.” In Jonathan R. Adelman, ed.Superpowers and Revolution. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey and Andrew Warner. 1995. “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5398, Cambridge, MA.

  • — 1999. “The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth.”Journal of Development Economics 59: 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, Jim. 1996.Developing Jepara in New Order Indonesia. Clayton, Australia: Monash Asia Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Benjamin. 2004. “Oil Wealth and Regime Survival in the Developing World, 1960–1999.”American Journal of Political Science 48, 2 (April): 232–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Richard. 1998. “Paths Out of Sultanistic Regimes: Combining, Structural and Voluntarist Perspectives.” Pp. 49–81 in H.E. Chehabi and J. Linz, eds.Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujanto, Ir. 1991.Pokok-pokok Pemerintahan di Daerah: Proses Pembuatan Undang-undang No. 5, 1974 (Principles of Regional Government: The Process of Making Law No. 5, 1974). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryadinata, Leo. 1989.Military Ascendancy and Political Culture: A Study of Indonesia’s GOLKAR. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles and Michael Hudson. 1972.World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ’Uyuzi, Muhammad-Rahim. 2001. Tabaqat-e Ejtema’i va Rezhim-e Shah (Social Classes and the Shah’s Regime). Tehran, Iran: Merkez-e Asnad-e Enqelab-e Eslami.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001.African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, Marvin. 1973. “Iran Finds a Party System: The Institutionalization of Iran Novin.”Middle East Journal 27: 439–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Benjamin Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Benjamin Smith is an assistant professor of political science and Asian studies at the University of Florida. His first book,Hard Times in the Land of Plenty: Oil, Opposition, and Late Development, is under contract with Cornell University Press. Other work has appeared in theAmerican Journal of Political Science, World Politics, and theJournal of International Affairs. He is currently at work on a book-length study of durable authoritarianism with Jason Brownlee (University of Texas-Austin) and on a study of the conditions under which democracy can consolidate in oil-rich countries with Joseph Kraus (University of Florida).

Thanks to Jason Brownlee, Sam Huntington, Joel Migdal, Pete Moore, Jon Pevehouse, Susan Pharr, Dan Slater, David Waldner, Patricia Woods, participants in the Sawyer Seminar in comparative politics at Harvard University; participants in the “Transforming Authoritarian Rentier Economies and Protectorates” seminar at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Bonn; and three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, B. The wrong kind of crisis: Why oil booms and busts rarely lead to authoritarian breakdown. St Comp Int Dev 40, 55–76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686303

Keywords

Search

Navigation