Skip to main content
Log in

Postsocialist patronage: Expressions of resistance and loyalty

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on patronage in postsocialist Russia focuses on structural and exchange aspects, but neglects deeper cultural forces that contribute to its reproduction. This study adopts a “bottom-up” approach to understanding the culture of patronage by analyzing the claims of ordinary citizens in “letters to the editor” from a postsocialist Russian locality. The common conventions authors use to legitimize claims share many characteristic features with patronage. Rather than judge authorities based on policy or ability to represent citizen interests, authors evaluate the moral and ethical worth of individuals, making their claims highly personalized. Evidence from these analyses suggests clients help sustain patronage by publicly expressing claims in a language infused with particularlism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afanas’ev, Mikhail. 1996. “Klientela v Rossii vchera i sevodnia.”Polis 1: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyero, Javier. 1999. “‘From the Client’s Point(s) of View:’ How Do Poor People Perceive and Evaluate Political Clientelism.”Theory and Society 28: 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. “TheBildungsroman in the History of Realism.” Pp. 10–59 inSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanova, Elena. 2005. “Sovetskaia traditsiia pravovoi zaschchity, ili V ozhidanii zaboty.,”Neprikosnovennyi zapas [online] 39(1) [cited November 28, 2005]. Available from: <http://www.nz-online.ru/index.phtml?aid=25011328>.

  • Boissevain, Jeremy. 1965.Saints and Fireworks. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc. 1996. “Endless Disputes: From Intimate Injury to Public Denunciation.” Working Papers in Networks and Interpretation, 96–2, Department of Sociology, Cornell University.

  • Boltanski, Luc and Laurent Thevenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.”European Journal of Social Theory 2(3): 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Linda J. 2001. “Trade Unions, Management, and the State in Contemporary Russia.” Pp. 151–172 inBusiness and the State in Contemporary Russia, ed. P. Rutland. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Linda J. and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 1999. “The Return of the Left and Its Impact on the Welfare State in Russia, Poland and Hungary.” Pp. 47–108 inLeft Parties and Social Policy in Post-Communist Europe, eds. L. Cook, M. Orenstein, and M. Rueschemeyer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. and Luis Roniger. 1980. “Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 42–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 1999.Everyday Stalinism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, Roberto. 1998. “Narrative Analysis—Why (And How) Sociologists Should Be Interested in Narrative.” Pp. 517–554 inAnnual Review of Sociology, ed. J. Hagan, Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Thomas. 1995. “Novyi rossiiskii rezhim.”Nezavisimaia gazeta, November 23.

  • Humphrey, Caroline. 2002.The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, Alex and Kent Geiger. 1952. “Critical Letters to, the Editors of the Soviet Press: Areas and Modes of Complaint.”American Sociological Review 17(6): 694–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkow, Peter. 1995. “Regional Warlordism in Russia: The Case of Primorskii Krai.”Europe-Asia Studies 47(6): 923–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, Janos. 1986. “Soft Budget Constraint.”Kyklos 39(1): 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotkin, Stephen. 1995.Magnetic Mountain: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlova, N.N. 1996.Gorizonty povsednevnosti sovetskoi epokhi. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kryshtanovskaia, Olga. 2005.Anatomiia rossiiskoi elity. Moscow: Zakharov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, Alena. 1998.Russia’s Economy of Favors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, Michael. 1999. “The Political Economy of Social Policy Reform in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests.” Pp. 207–235 InLeft Parties and Social Policy in, Post-Communist Europe, eds. L. Cook, M. Orenstein, and M. Rueschemeyer, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Paul. 1998. “A Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks and Political Culture.”American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 51–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, T.H. and Bohdan Harasymiw. 1983.Leadership Selection and Patron-Client Relations in the USSR and Yugoslavia. London: Allen Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanov, Pavel. 1996. “The Regional Elite in the Epoch of Bankruptcy.” Pp. 210–240 inConflict and Change in the Russian Industrial Enterprise, ed. S. Clarke, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roniger, Luis and Ayse Gunes-Ayata, eds. 1994.Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. Boulder, CO: L. Reinner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James. 1977. “Patronage or Exploitations?” Pp. 21–39 inPatrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies, eds. E. Gellner and J. Waterbury, London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Sydel. 1977. “Patronage as Myth.” Pp. 7–20 inPatrons and Clients in Meditteranean Societies, eds. E. Gellner and J. Waterbury. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.”Past and Present 50(Feburary): 76–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1995.Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003.Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, David. 1989. “Discursive Strategies in the 1905 Revolution.”Russian Review 54: 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder, Andrew. 1986.Communist Neo-Traditionalism. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Thomas. 1990. “From Patronage to Brokerage in the Local Politics of Eastern Ireland.”Ethnohistory 37(2): 158–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Stephen. 2000.Russia’s New Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, David. 1996. “Petitions and the ‘Invention’ of Public Opinion in the English Revolution.”American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1497–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Andrew D. Buck is a lecturer in sociology at the University of Reading, England. His interests include social network analysis and postsocialist transitions. He has written on aspects of the privatization process, as well as on the relationship between elite networks and democracy in postsocialist Russia.

Research for this article was supported in part by a grant from the international Research and Exchanges Board (IREX). Grateful thanks to Vladimir Levitchev for research assistance. Special thanks to Antonina Bambina for her insightful suggestions and criticisms throughtout different stages of the research. I would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments I received from Roberto Franzosi, Jeff Hass, Jorge Rodriguez, and David Stark on a previous draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buck, A.D. Postsocialist patronage: Expressions of resistance and loyalty. St Comp Int Dev 41, 3–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686234

Keywords

Navigation