Abstract
Prominent union wage settlements are sometimes thought to have a pattern-setting influence on the economy as a whole. However, a telephone survey after the GM-UAW settlement in the fall of 1993 reveals widespread ignorance of the settlement on the part of wage setters. Such ignorance suggests that big union settlements do not have direct spillover effects outside their immediate industries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Compensation Association.1993 Membership Directory. Scottsdale, Ariz.: ACA, 1993.
Budd, John W. “The Determinants and Extent of UAW Pattern Bargaining.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (April 1992): 523–39.
Eckstein, Otto, and Thomas A. Wilson. “The Determination of Money Wages in U.S. Industry.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 76 (August 1962): 379–414.
Freedman, Audrey, and William E. Fulmer. “Last Rites for Pattern Bargaining.”Harvard Business Review 60 (March–April 1982): 30–48.
Ready, Kathryn J. “Is Pattern Bargaining Dead?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (January 1990): pp. 272–9.
Ross, Arthur M.Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1948.
Rowen, Hobart. “Bosworth Says U.S. Fumbles Rail Talks.”Washington Post, June 16, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erickson, C.L., Mitchell, D.J.B. Pattern indifference: The response of pay setters to the 1993 GM-UAW settlement. Journal of Labor Research 16, 230–234 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685743
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685743