Abstract
A changing labor relations climate has caused many national unions to merge with smaller independent unions in recent years. One aspect of the merger process concerns the willingness of independent union members to support affiliation with a national union (Chaison, 1986). This article examines the determinants of indivudual-level voting behavior using data gathered from members of an independent union who rejected a proposed affiliation with a national union in a membership referendum. Logistic regression results indicate that affiliation supporters perceived the affiliation as improving union effectiveness, were influenced by social support among co-workers in favor of the merger, and perceived the saliency of the independent union’s support for the affiliation proposal. Conversely, affiliation opposition was influenced by the employer’s “vote no” campaign and by perceptions that affiliation would lead to an increased probability of strikes and to future increases in dues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFL-CIO Committee on the Evolution of Work.The Changing Situation of Workers and Their Unions. Washington, D.C.: AFL-CIO, 1985.
Beyer, Janice M., and Harrison M. Trice. “A Field Study of the Use and Perceived Effects of Discipline in Controlling Work Performance.”Academy of Management Review 27 (October 1984): 743–64.
Bureau of National Affairs. “Overall Number of Unions Fell During 1980s Due to Mergers.”Daily Labor Report No. 223 (November 19, 1990), C-1,2.
_____. “Replacement Workers: Evidence from the Popular Press.” Washington, D.C.: BNA-PLUS, 1991.
Chaison, Gary. “Union Mergers in the United States: Recent Trends and Questions for Research.” Clark University, Worcester, March 9, 1992, paper presented at the Symposium on Emerging Unions Structures: An International Comparison.
_____.When Unions Merge. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1986.
Chatak, Elmer. “A Unionist’s Perspective on the Future of American Unions.”Journal of Labor Research 12 (Fall 1991): 327–32.
Cohen, Larry. Communications Workers of America, Washington, D.C. Telephone interview, December 16, 1991.
Conant, John L., and David L. Kaserman. “Union Merger Incentives and Pecuniary Externalities.”Journal of Labor Research 10 (Summer 1989): 243–53.
Cornfield, Daniel. “The Attitude of Employee Association Members Toward Union Mergers: The Effect of Socioeconomic Status.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44 (January 1991): 334–48.
DeCotiis, Thomas A., and Jean-Yves LeLouran. “A Predictive Study of Voting Behavior in a Representation Election Using Union Instrumentality and Work Perceptions.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27 (February 1981): 102–18.
Feldacker, Bruce.Labor Guide to Labor Law. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990.
Fiorito, Jack, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Charles R. Greer. “Determinants of Unionism: A Review of the Literature.” InResearch in Personnel and Human Resource Management. eds., Kenneth M. Roland and Gerald R. Ferris. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 269–306.
Gallagher, Daniel G., and George Strauss. “Union Membership Attitudes and Participation.” In George Strauss, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Jack Fiorito, eds.,The State of the Unions. Industrial Relations Research Association Series, Madison, Wisc. 1991, pp. 139–73.
Getman, Julius G., Stephen B. Goldberg, and Jeanne B. Herman.Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality. New York: Russel Sage, 1976.
Hackman, Richard J. “Group Influence on Individuals.” InHandbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. Marvin D. Dunnett. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
Janus, Charles J. “Union Mergers in the 1970’s: A Look at the Reasons and the Results.”Monthly Labor Review 101 (October 1978): 13–23.
Klandermans, Bert. “Psychology and Trade Union Participation: Joining, Acting, and Quitting.”Journal of Occupational Psychology 59 (September 1986): 198–204.
Kleeman, Janet. “Implications of the National Labor Relations Board’s New Standard for Union Affiliation Elections.”Labor Law Journal 37 (February 1986): 75–93.
Kochan, Thomas A. “How American Workers View Labor Unions”.Monthly Labor Review 102 (April 1979): 23–31.
Martin, James E. “Predictions of Individual Propensity to Strike.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (January 1986): 214–17.
Mathieu, John E., and Stacey S. Kohler. “A Cross-Level Examination of Group Influence on Individual Absences.”Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (April 1990): 217–20.
McClendon, John A., and Brian Klaas. “Determinants of Strike-Related Militancy: An Analysis of a University Faculty Strike.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (April 1993): 560–73.
Montgomery, B. Ruth. “The Influence of Attitudes and Normative Pressures on Voting Decisions in a Union Certification Election.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 (January 1989): 262–69.
Murrmann, Kent F., and Andrew A. Porter. “Employer Campaign Tactics and NLRB Election Outcomes: Some Preliminary Evidence.”Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association 35 (1982): 67–72.
Premack, Steven L., and John E. Hunter. “Individual Unionization Decisions.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (March 1988): 223–34.
Stratton-Devine, Kay. “Union Merger Benefits: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Labor Research 13 (Winter 1992): 133–43.
Strauss, George. “Union Government in the U.S.: Research Past and Future.”Industrial Relations 16 (May 1977): 215–42.
Wheeler, Hoyt N., and John A. McClendon. “The Individual Decision to Unionize.” In George Strauss, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Jack Fiorito, Eds.,The State of the Unions. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association Series, 1991, pp. 47–83.
Zalesny, Mary D. “Comparison of Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Predicting Faculty Vote Preference in a Union Representation Election.”Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (May 1985): 243–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McClendon, J.A., Kriesky, J. & Eaton, A. Member support for union mergers: An analysis of an affiliation referendum. Journal of Labor Research 16, 9–23 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685710
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685710