Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

District elections and the power of municipal employee unions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very little prior research has been devoted to the effects of the institutional structure of local government on public sector labor markets. This study addresses the differential effects of the two main systems used to elect city council members — district versus citywide (at-large) elections. The study hypothesizes that, in district-election cities, municipal employees, especially those who are unionized, face a lower cost of influencing city council candidates and, consequently, will have greater power to influence employment conditions. To test this hypothesis, data on U.S. cities over 25,000 population are used to estimate both reduced form and structural wage and employment equations. The results are consistent with the basic hypothesis: district elections provide a more fertile ground for municipal employees, especially those organized in unions, to affect their employment conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, James, and William Orzechowski. “The Voting Behavior of Bureaucrats: Some Empirical Evidence.”Public Choice 41 (1983): 271–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courant, Paul, Edward Gramlich, and Daniel Rubinfeld. “Public Employee Market Power and the Level of Government Spending.”American Economic Review 69 (December 1979): 806–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalenberg, Douglas R., and Kevin Duffy-Deno. “At-Large Versus Ward Elections: Implications for Public Infrastructure.”Public Choice 70 (June 1991): 335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, Kevin T., and Stephen L. Mehay. “Municipal Management Structure and Fiscal Performance: Do City Managers Make a Difference?”Southern Economic Journal 54 (January 1987): 627–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, Leonard, and Claude Montmarquette. “The Effects of Non-Clearing Labor Markets on the Demand for Public Spending.”Economic Inquiry 22 (April 1984): 151–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnham, Paul G. “Form of Government and the Median Voter.”Social Science Quarterly 68 (September 1987): 569–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, Rodolfo, Stephen Mehay, and Kevin Duffy-Deno. “Municipal Residency Laws: Effects on Police Employment, Compensation, and Productivity.”Journal of Labor Research 12 (Fall 1991): 439–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Kathy, and Semoon Chang. “The Relative Efficiency of City Managers and Mayor-Council Forms of Government.”Southern Economic Journal 57 (July 1990): 167–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Werner, and Anthony Rufolo. “Economic Effect of Residence Laws on Municipal Police.”Journal of Urban Economics 17 (July 1985): 335–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, Robert L., and Edmund P. Fowler. “Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities.”American Political Science Review 61 (September 1967): 701–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, William. “Reform and Response in American Cities: Structure and Policy Reconsidered.”Social Science Quarterly 59 (June 1978): 118–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___, and Malcolm Jewell. “Minority Representation and the Drawing of City Council Districts.”Urban Affairs Quarterly 23 (March 1988): 432–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S.Introduction to Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David R., and John P. Pelissero. “Urban Policy: Does Political Structure Matter?”American Political Science Review 74 (December 1980): 999–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Kevin M. “Compensation, Employment, and the Political Activity of Public Employee Unions.”Journal of Labor Research 13 (Spring 1992): 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Gary J. “Tests of Institutional Versus Non-Institutional Models of Local Expenditure Determination.”Public Choice 70 (June 1991): 315–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Heywood T. “The Government of American Cities,” in theMunicipal Yearbook, 1982. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo, Stephen J. “Public Sector Unions and Municipal Employment.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (October 1991): 166–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce,Labor-Management Relations in State and Local Governments: 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zax, Jeffrey S. “Reform City Councils and Municipal Employees.”Public Choice 64 (February 1990): 167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, 93943, Monterey, CA

    Stephen L. Mehay

  2. San Jose State University, 95192, San Jose, CA

    Rodolfo A. Gonzalez

Authors
  1. Stephen L. Mehay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodolfo A. Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of Tim Sass, Tom Means, and participants in a session at the 1991 Public Choice Society meetings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehay, S.L., Gonzalez, R.A. District elections and the power of municipal employee unions. Journal of Labor Research 15, 387–402 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685705

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685705

Keywords

Search

Navigation