Abstract
Much recent cultural criticism points out the ways in which “writing about ‘the Other’” perpetuates, justifies and participates in the creation of “real-life” relations of domination and oppression between the “authors” (located in the center(s) of power and knowledge) and their “subject matters.” This paper takes a different approach and explores theliberating potentials of “writing about ‘the Other.’” Completed in the spring of 1991, in the wake of changes in Eastern Europe from the fall of 1989, this paper gives a loose mapping of the nascent Eastern European cultural constellations, as well as an elaboration of the position of a “native” intellectual, in order to circuitously come to the point from which it can articulate the ways in which “Western” writing about “Eastern Europe” can create liberating interventions in the struggles going on in Eastern Europe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Gordana P. Crnkovic is completing her Ph.D. thesis, entitled “Eastern European and Anglo-American Literature Against Closure: A Cross-Cultural Perspective,” in the Program of Modern Thought and Literature at Stanford University. Her published or forthcoming articles include “That Other Place” (on Yugoslav women writers), “The Gender Revolution within the ‘Gentle’ Revolution: Women in the Transition to Post-Communism” (co-written with Szonja Szelenyi), and “Utopian America and the Language ofSilence” (on John Cage).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crnkovic, G.P. Why should you write about Eastern Europe, or: Why should you write about “the Other”?. Feminist Issues 12, 21–42 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685620
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685620