Skip to main content
Log in

Nepotism and the minimum wage

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

That an increase in the minimum wage or minimum wage coverage results in an increase in the incidence of nepotism is empirically tested using 1972 data on job-seeking methods used by American workers. The elasticity of the incidence of nepotism with respect to the level of the minimum wage and minimum wage coverage in 1977 is estimated at between .38 and .68.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. and Kessel, R. “Competition, Monopoly, and the Pursuit of Pecuniary Gain.” InAspects of Labor Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (for National Bureau of Economic Research), 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. “Models of Job Discrimination.” InRacial Discrimination in Economic Life, edited by A. Pascal. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Health, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. “Some Mathematical Models of Race in the Labor Market.” InRacial Discrimination in Economic Life, edited by A. Pascal. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Health, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. Comments on article by A. Alchian and R. Kessel, “Competition, Monopoly, and the Pursuit of Pecuniary Gain.” InAspects of Labor Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (for National Bureau of Economic Research), 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____.The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaim, P. and Peters, N.. “Usual Weekly Earnings of American Workers.”Monthly Labor Review 95 (March 1972): 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A. “Information Networks in Labor Markets.”American Economic Review 56 (May 1966): 559–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. “Approaches to the Economics of Discrimination.”American Economic Review 63 (May 1973): 287–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Money Income in 1972 of Families and Persons in the United States. Current Population Reports: Consumer Income Series P-60, No. 90. December 1973.

  • _____.1970 Census of the Population, Subject Report PC(2)-7A,Occupational Characteristics. Washington, D.C.: 1973.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.Employment and Earnings, United States, 1909–1975, Bulletin 1312-10, 1976.

  • _____.Jobseeking Methods Used by American Workers, Bulletin 1886. Washington, D.C.: 1975.

  • _____.Tomorrow’s Manpower Needs: Vol. IV,The National Industry-Occupational Matrix and Other Manpower Data. Washington, D.C.: 1972.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration.Minimum Wage and Maximum Hours Standards Under the Federal Labor Standards Act, 1973.

  • Wessels, W. “The Effect of Minimum Wages in the Presence of Fringe Benefits: An Expanded Model.”Economic Inquiry 18 (April 1980): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. “Government Sanctioned Restraints That Reduce Economic Opportunities for Minorities.”Policy Review 2 (Fall 1977): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Peter Montiel and Geoffrey Woglom for their helpful comments and suggestions and Bruce Chesebrough for providing the stimulus to write this paper; remaining errors are my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, R.T. Nepotism and the minimum wage. Journal of Labor Research 4, 81–89 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685505

Keywords

Navigation