Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of right-to-work legislation on union outcomes: Additional evidence

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors reexamine the role of open shop legislation in affecting union outcomes. New indices of union success are employed which include election voting behavior, the size of newly certified units, and the rate of union decertification. Three competing hypotheses are empirically tested: (1) the free rider argument predicting lower membership levels in right-to-work (RTW) areas; (2) the saturationist hypothesis predicting a higher level of organizing activity in RTW areas as a result of large concentrations of unorganized workers; and, (3) the hypothesis that legislation is vitiated by distinct organizing behaviors in RTW and nonRTW areas. Empirical results, based on SMSA data from 35 states, tend to provide support for hypotheses (2) and (3). Recently, RTW areas have experienced more prounion outcomes, and the union returns to regional attributes (measured by Chow tests) are found to be distinct in the two areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and J. Pencavel, “American Trade Union Growth: 1900–1960,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83 (3), August 1969, 434–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, James T. and M. Johnson, “The Impact of Right to Work Laws on the Economic Behavior of Local Unions — A Property Rights Perspective,”Journal of Labor Research, 1 (1), Spring 1980, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Richard and D. Saks, “Union Decision-Making and The Supply of Union Representation: A Preliminary Analysis,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisc.: 1980, 212–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. “Why Employees Want Unions,”Organizational Dynamics, 8, Spring 1980, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John F. Jr., “The Extent of Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector,” inPublic Sector Bargaining, Benjamin Aaron,et al (eds.) Industrial Relations Research Association, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC 1979, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S. and A. R. Schwartz, “U.S. Labor Turnover: Analysis of a New Measure,”Monthly Labor Review, 103 (11), November 1980, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, R. E. “Public Education” inCollective Bargaining: Contemporary American Experiences, Gerald Somers, ed. Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisc.: 1980, 487–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter B. and M. Piore,Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analyses, (Lexington, Mass: Heath), 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Ralph D. “The Impact of Right-to-Work Laws on Union Activity,” paper presented at the Western Economic Association meetings, Anaheim, 1977.

  • Freeman, Richard B. and J. Medoff, “New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32 (2) January 1979, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Woodrow “Union Growth, Government and Structure,” in W. Ginburg,et al., eds.A Review of Industrial Relations Research, Vol. I, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisc: 1970, 207–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T. “The Determinants of Unionization: An Analysis of Interarea Differences,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33 (2) January 1980, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A. “How American Workers View Labor Unions,”Monthly Labor Review, 102 (4), April 1979, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, Keith and C. Petersen. “The Effect of Right-to-Work Laws on Unionization in the United States,”Journal of Political Economy, 83 (6), December 1975, 1237–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, Charles and S. Mohrman, “Worker Attitudes Toward Unions: A Study Integrating Industrial Relations and Organizational Behavior Perspectives,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisc, 1981, 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midwest Center for Public Sector Labor Relations,Labor Legislation on the Public Sector, (Bloomington: School of Public and Environmental Affairs), 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, William J. and R. J. Newman, “On the Prospects for American Trade Union Growth: A Cross-Section Analysis, “Review of Economics and Statistics, 57 (4) November 1975, 435–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics,Digest of Education Statistics, 1977–78, Washington, D.C., 1979.

  • National Labor Relations Board,Thirty-Ninth Annual Report of the National Labor Relations Board FY 1974 (series from FY 1967). Washington, 1975.

  • Northrup, Herbert and H. Foster,Open Shop Construction, Major Study No. 54 (Philadelphia: Industrial Research Unit, The Wharton School) 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur,The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, C. and N. A. Palomba, “Right-to-Work Laws: A Suggested Economic Rationale,”Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2), October 1971, 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, John H. “The Demand for Union Services: An Exercise,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 24 (2) January 1971, 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roomkin, Myron and H. Juris, “Unions in the Traditional Sectors: The Mid-Life Passage,” inProceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Associations, Madison, Wisc. 1979, 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter and R. Strauss, “The Effect of Unions on Earnings and Earnings on Unions: A Mixed Logit Approach,”International Economic Review, 17 (1), February 1976, 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreisheim, C. “Job Satisfaction, Attitudes Toward Unions, and Voting in Union Representation Elections,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (October 1978), 548–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,Directory of National Unions and Employee Associations, 1974, Bulletin 1937, USGPO Washington, 1975.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,Employment and Earnings, 21 (11), May 1975.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census,1970 Census of Population, U.S. Summary, and Supplementary Report 105, Washington, 1973.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census,City and County Data Book, 1977, Washington, 1977.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Series P-20, No. 334,Demographic Social, and Economic Profile of States, Spring, 1976, Washington, D.C., 1979.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Series P-20, No. 709Estimates of the Population of County and Metropolitan Areas, July 1974 and 1975, Washington, D.C., 1977.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census,Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1977. Washington, D.C. 1978.

  • Warren, Robert S. Jr. and R. Strauss, “A Mixed Logit Model of the Relationship Between Unionization and Right-to-work Legislation,”Journal of Political Economy, 87 (3), June 1979, 648–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Walter J. “Economic Effects of Right To Work Laws,”Journal of Labor Research, 2 (1), Spring 1981, 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunt, J.C., White, R.A. The effects of right-to-work legislation on union outcomes: Additional evidence. Journal of Labor Research 4, 47–63 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685503

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685503

Keywords

Navigation