Abstract
In a recent article in this journal, Michael Kurth presented what he considered evidence that teachers’ unions impair educational achievement and that what they must do to increase teachers’ salaries is harmful to educational excellence. This comment critically examines Kurth’s misspecified model and the misleadingly defined variables that led to the erroneous empirical support for his conclusion. Our own estimates indicate that states with a high level of collective bargaining had higher SAT scores in 1982.
References
Congressional Budget Office.Trends in Educational Achievement. Washington, D.C., April 1986.
_____.Educational Achievement: Explanations and Implications of Recent Trends. Washington, D.C., 1987.
Eberts, Randall W. and Joe A. Stone.Unions and Public Schools. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1984.
Hanushek, Eric. “Teacher Characteristics and Gains in Student Achievement: Estimation Using Micro Data.”American Economic Review 61 (May 1971): 280–88.
Kurth, Michael. “Teachers’ Unions and Excellence in Education: An Analysis of the Decline in SAT Scores.”Journal of Labor Research 8 (Fall 1987): 351–67.
National Education Association.Status of the American Public School Teachers 1985–86. Washington, D.C., 1987.
Powell, Brian and Lala Steelman. “Variations in State SAT Performance: Meaningful or Misleading.”Harvard Educational Review 54 (November 1984): 398–412.
U.S. Departments of Commerce and Labor. “Labor-Management Relations in State and Local Governments: 1986. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Condition of Education, 1983. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, F.H., Gould, J.C. Teachers’ unions and excellence in education: Comment. Journal of Labor Research 9, 379–387 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685471
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685471