Abstract
Using archival data, 12 independent variables pertaining to organizing strategy, organizing resources, and financial resources were used to predict the NLRB certification election success rates of national unions in three different time periods. The more than 50 unions participated in more than 75 percent of such elections. Relative to the hypothesized relationships, a mixed set of results was obtained. Possible explanations for these results, along with suggestions for more refined measurement procedures, are offered in terms of future research needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bain, G.The Growth of White Collar Unions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
Block, R. N. “Union Organizing and the Allocation of Union Resources.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34 (1980): 101–13.
_____ and S. L. Premack. “The Unionization Process: A Review of the Literature.” In D. B. Lipsky and J. M. Douglas, eds.,Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations: A Research Annual. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1983.
Dickens, W. T. and J. S. Leonard. “Accounting for the Decline in Union Membership, 1950–1980.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (1985): 323–34.
Freeman, R. B. “Why Are Unions Faring Poorly in NLRB Representation Elections.” In T. A. Kochan, ed.,Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.
_____ and J. L. Medoff.What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books 1984.
Heneman, H. G. III and M. H. Sandver. “Predicting the Outcome of Union Certification Elections: A Review of the Literature.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (1983): 537–59.
Kotlowitz, A. “Labor May Be Poised to End Long Decline, Recover Some Clout.”Wall Street Journal, August 28, 1987.
Maranto, C. L. and J. Fiorito. “The Effect of Union Characteristics on NLRB Certification Election Outcomes.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 (1987): 225–40.
Prosten, R. “The Longest Season: Union Organizing in the Last Decade.”Industrial Relations Research Association Proceedings (1978), pp. 240–49.
Roomkin, M. and R. Block. “Case Processing Time and the Outcome of Representation Elections: Some Empirical Evidence.”University of Illinois Law Review 1 (1981): 75–97.
Sandver, M. H. “Inter-Union Differences in NLRB Election Outcomes.” Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, San Diego, 1981.
_____. “South-Nonsouth Differentials in NLRB Certification Election Outcomes.”Journal of Labor Research 3 (1982): 18–30.
_____ and H. G. Heneman III. “Union Growth Through the Election Process.”Industrial Relations 20 (1981): 109–16.
_____ and J. C. Latack. “The Effect of Unit Size on Outcomes of NLRB Certification Elections.” Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, New York, 1982.
Shabecoff, P. “AFL-CIO Acts to Coordinate Union Recruiting.”New York Times, February 24, 1980.
Sheflin, N. and L. Troy. “Finances of American Unions in the 1970s.”Journal of Labor Research 4 (1983): 149–58.
Voos, P. B. “Union Organizing: Costs and Benefits.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (1983): 576–91.
_____. “Trends in Union Organizing Expenditures, 1953–1977.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (1984): 52–63.
_____. “Union Organizing Expenditures: Determinants and Their Implications for Union Growth.”Journal of Labor Research 8 (1987): 19–30.
Warren, J. “Why Unions Are Losing Grip on Organizing.”Chicago Tribune, June 21, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support for this project was provided by the Graduate School Research Committee at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and by the Graduate and Research Committee, College of Business at the Ohio State University. Data analysis was provided by Kyu Hwang. We thank Marick Masters, Anne Miner, and Craig Olson and an anonymous reviewer for comments. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Chicago, August 1986.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heneman, H.G., Sandver, M.H. Union characteristics and organizing success. Journal of Labor Research 10, 377–389 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685330
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685330