Skip to main content
Log in

Unions, corporations, and political campaign contributions: The 1982 house elections

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because legislation affects so many aspects of the labor market, unions have long considered the political arena to be a major battleground. This paper investigates fund raising, a primary ingredient of this political activity. Specifically, the pattern of campaign contributions from labor PACs (and corporate PACs) is explained as an interaction of supply and demand. The results suggest that the demand for funds depends on the tightness of the race, the tenure of the incumbent, and ideology. Contributors are more willing to support ideological allies, expected winners, and powerful candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamany, David and George E. Agree.Political Money: A Strategy for Campaign Financing in America. Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, James T. “Symposium on Unions and Politics: Introductory Remarks.”Journal of Labor Research 5 (Summer 1984): 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Henry W. “Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting: A Simultaneous Probit-Tobit Model.”Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (February 1982): 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Joseph and William West. “The Congressional Career in the 1970’s.” InCongress Revisited, ed. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer, 2nd ed. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1981, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenhalt, Alan.Politics in America: Members of Congress in Washington and at Home. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Paul J. and Glenn A. Melnick. “Political Contributions by Health PACs to the 96th Congress.”Inquiry (Winter 1982): 283–294.

  • Fenno, Richard E., Jr.Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P.Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. “Some Comments on the Significance of Labor Unions for Economic Policy.” InThe Impact of the Union, ed. D. M. Wright. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Linda L. “How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the U.S. Congress.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (1982): 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopoian, J. David. “What Makes PACs Tick? An Analysis of the Allocative Patterns of Economic Interest Groups.”American Journal of Political Science (1984): 259–281.

  • Halvorsen, R. and R. Palmquist. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.”The American Economic Review (June 1980): 474–475.

  • Herndon, James F. “Access, Record, and Competition as Influences on Interest Group Contributions to Congressional Campaigns.”Journal of Politics 44 (1982): 996–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C.Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Incumbents’ Advantages in the 1978 U.S. Congressional Elections.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (May 1981): 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, James B. and Paul H. Rubin.Congressmen, Constituents, and Contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhof for Public Choice Society, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, Donald Keenan, and Paul H. Rubin. “A General Equilibrium Model of Congressional Voting.”Quarterly Journal of Economics (May 1982): 271–93.

  • Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, Keith and John R. Wright. “The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations.”American Journal of Political Science 27 (1983): 140–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malbin, Michael J. “Campaign Financing and the Special Interests.”The Public Interest 56 (1979): 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam. “Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting.”Journal of Law and Economics 27 (1984): 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry J.PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J. “Political Action Committees in American Politics: An Overview.” InWhat Price PACs? New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri.Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. P. “The Allocation of Political Monies: Economic Interest Groups.”Public Choice 35 (1980): 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “Campaign Contributions and Legislative Voting: Milk Money and Dairy Price Supports.”Western Political Quarterly 35 (December 1982): 478–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilhite, A., Theilmann, J. Unions, corporations, and political campaign contributions: The 1982 house elections. Journal of Labor Research 7, 175–185 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685309

Keywords

Navigation