Skip to main content
Log in

A probit model of NLRB bargaining order cases in the appellate courts

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines NLRB bargaining orders that have gone to appeals courts and ascertains what factors influence whether or not the order is enforced and to what degree these factors influence the likelihood of enforcement. Substantial information has been collected from each reported appellate decision that reviewed NLRB bargaining orders issued over a four-year period. A probit regression model is employed to examine whether factors related to an employer’s unfair labor practice campaign are involved in the circuit court’s enforcement decisions or if more weight is given to unrelated factors, such as the circuit in which the appeal is heard or the amount of judicial delay involved in the appeals process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, W. E. and D. M. Waldman. “The Probit Model.” InEconometric Modelling in Economic Education Research. Edited by Becker and Walstad. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethel, T. “Profiting from Unfair Labor Practices: The Reagan Influence.”Indiana Law Journal 60 (1984): 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ and C.A. Melfi. “Judicial Enforcement of NLRB Bargaining Orders: What Influences the Court?”University of California Davis Law Review, November 1988.

  • Cooper, L. “Authorization Cards and Union Representation Election Outcomes: An Empirical Assessment of the Assumption Underlying the Supreme Court’s Gissel Decision.”Northwestern University Law Review 79 (1984): 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getman, J., S. Goldberg, and J. Herman. “NLRB Regulation of Campaign Tactics: The Behavioral Assumptions on Which the Board Regulates.”Stanford Law Review 27 (1975): 1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____.Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, P. “Promises to Keep: Securing Workers’ Rights to Self-Organization Under the NLRA.”Harvard Law Review 96 (1983): 1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Funding for this research was supported by NSF Grant SES-86-18517.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melfi, C.A., Bethel, T.A. A probit model of NLRB bargaining order cases in the appellate courts. Journal of Labor Research 10, 255–270 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685270

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685270

Keywords

Navigation