Skip to main content
Log in

The arbitration literature: Who contributes?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Who shapes, fashions, and molds the body of labor arbitral thought? This article answers this question and identifies the characteristics of those who contribute to the arbitration literature. Factor analysis was applied to and descriptive statistics calculated for data on 540 authors whose works the Committee on Research of the National Academy of Arbitrators believes constitute the most complete compendium of important arbitration literature available. The study concludes that members of the National Academy are more productive than nonmembers; for both members and nonmembers, practicing attorneys publish more arbitration awards than do professors; and practicing attorneys publish more articles, books, and monographs than do professors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Committee on Research, National Academy of Arbitrators.An Annotated Bibliography of Labor Arbitration. Labor Arbitration Award, No. 1308. Chicago, Illinois: Commerce Clearing House, Inc. October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. et al.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Macmillan, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dilts, D.A., Deitsch, C.R. The arbitration literature: Who contributes?. Journal of Labor Research 10, 207–214 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685265

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685265

Keywords

Navigation