Skip to main content
Log in

Wage and nonwage outcomes in collective bargaining: Determinants and tradeoffs

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using unskilled labor wage rates and union contract scores derived from a sample of 500 U.S. manufacturing contracts, this study finds that in 1975 there was considerable variation in unions’ abilities to deliver higher wages and desirable nonwage contractual provisions to their members (though it is clear that the stronger unions have bargained high levels of both wages and nonwage items). There are a variety of union power, employee quality, union preference, and employer cost variables which impact upon the bargaining choices made between wages and nonwage provisions, and it appears that union strength tilts the compensation package toward wages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, John, “Bargaining Outcomes: An IR Systems Approach,”Industrial Relations, 18 (Spring 1979), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and George Johnson, “Unionism, Relative Wages, and Labor Quality in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,”International Economic Review, 13 (October 1972), 488–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles and James Medoff, “Trade Unions in the Production Process,”Journal of Political Economy, 80 (June 1978), 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donsimoni, Marie-Paule and Robert Shakotko, “Unionism and the Structure of Total Compensation,” Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 21, August 1979.

  • Freeman, Richard B., “Individual Mobility and Union Voice in the Labor Market,”American Economic Review, 66 (May 1976), 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, “The Effect of Trade Unionism on Fringe Benefits,” NBER Working Paper No. 292, 1978.

  • _____, “The Effect of Unionism on Worker Attachment to Firms,”Journal of Labor Research, 1 (Spring 1980), 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, and James Medoff, “New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32 (January 1979), 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, Paul, “Determinants of Bargaining Outcomes in Local Government Negotiations,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 29 (April 1976), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, Wallace, “Labor Market Structure and Union Wage Levels,”Economic Inquiry, 13 (September 1975), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, Peter Feuille and Carol Szerszen, “Regulation, Deregulation, and Collective Bargaining in Airlines,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34 (October 1980), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, and Lawrence M. Kahn, “The Determinants of Bargaining Structure in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” paper presented at the North American Meetings of the Econometric Society, Atlanta, Georgia, December, 1979.

  • Kahn, Lawrence, M., “Union Impact: A Reduced Form Approach,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59 (November 1977), 503–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, “Unionism and Relative Wages: Direct and Indirect Effects,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32 (July 1979), 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaysen, Carl and Donald F. Turner,Antitrust-Policy, (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas and Richard Block, “An Interindustry Analysis of Bargaining Outcomes: Preliminary Evidence From Two-Digit Industries,”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91 (August 1977), 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, and Hoyt Wheeler, “Municipal Collective Bargaining: A Model and Analysis of Bargaining Outcomes,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 29 (October 1975), 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. Gregg,Unionism and Relative Wages in the United States, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Medoff, James, “Layoffs and Alternatives Under Trade Unions in U.S. Manufacturing,”American Economic Review, 69 (June 1979), 380–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, James L. and Charles H. Levine, “An Interorganizational Analysis of Power, Conflict, and Settlements in Public Sector Collective Bargaining,”American Political Science Review, 70 (December 1976), 1185–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Robert, “The Economic Determinants of Private Wage Settlements,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1966.

  • Schwartzman, David and Joan Bodoff, “Concentration in Regional and Local Industries,”Southern Economic Journal, 37 (January 1971), 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert S., “Compensating Wage Differentials and Public Policy: A Review,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32 (April 1979), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,Industry Wage Surveys, (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, various issues).

  • U.S. Department of Commerce,1972 Census of Manufactures, (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, “Unions, Labor Market Structure, and the Welfare Implications of the Quality of Work,”Journal of Labor Research, 1 (Spring 1980), 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, “Wealth Effects and Earnings Premiums for Job Hazards,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60 (August 1978), 408–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard, “Concentration and Labor Earnings,”American Economic Review, 56 (March 1966), 96–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, (1966a), “Appendix to Concentration and Labor Earnings,” mimeo, 1966.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors, associate professors at the University of Illinois, are very grateful to Christopher Pawlowicz, Ronald Seeber, and Roger Wolters for their help in gathering data. They also are grateful to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Evaluation and Research of the U.S. Department of Labor and to the Research Board of the University of Illinois for financially supporting this research. Such support in no way implies, however, that the Department or the University endorses the methods or conclusions in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuille, P., Hendricks, W.E. & Kahn, L.M. Wage and nonwage outcomes in collective bargaining: Determinants and tradeoffs. Journal of Labor Research 2, 39–53 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685121

Keywords

Navigation