Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of exclusive representation to union strength

  • Symposium Exclusivity Of Union Representation In The Public Sector
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we show that exclusive representation and other union security agreements contribute substantially to union strength. A regression analysis of the growth of unionism among teachers during the 1970s measures just how potent exclusive representation and dues checkoff agreements are in stimulating union growth in the public sector. Further discussion prompts the conclusion that these powerful measures are especially inappropriate in the public sector, for they excessively coerce employees’ representation and benefit employers, not employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and John Pencavel. “American Trade Union Growth, 1900–1960.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (August 1969): 434–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, James T. and M. H. Johnson. “The Impact of Right-to-Work Laws on the Economic Behavior of Labor Unions — A Property Rights Perspective.”Journal of Labor Research 1 (Spring 1980): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, David.Steelworkers in America: The Nonunion Era. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. and Geoffrey Brennan. “The Logic of the Levers.” Working Paper, Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (June 1983).

  • _____ and Gordon Tullock.The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, David L. “Collective Bargaining Laws and Teacher Strikes.”Journal of Collective Negotiations 7 (Fall 1978): 201–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Edgar G., Bernard F. Lentz, and Jay M. Shafrity.State Government Productivity. New York: Praeger, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Amy H. “A Theory of the Organization of State and Local Government Employees.”Journal of Labor Research 3 (Spring 1982): 163–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John T.Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Macmillan Company, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, David T. and Glenn A. Fine. “The Impact of Right-to-Work Laws on Union Organizing.” NBER Working Paper No. 1116, May 1983.

  • Farber, Henry S. “Individual Preferences and Union Wage Determination: The Case of the United Mine Workers.”Journal of Political Economy 86 (October 1978): 923–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, Roger L. and Joseph D. Reid, Jr. “The Labor Union as Its Members’ Agent” in Joseph D. Reid, Jr., ed.,New Approaches to Labor Unions Research in Labor Economics. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. “The Two Faces of Unionism.”The Public Interest 57 (Fall 1979): 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton.A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Thomas R.Compulsory Unionism, the NLRB, and the Courts. Philadelphia: Industrial Research Unit of the University of Pennsylvania, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldman, Dan and Deborah Knight.Unions and Lobbying: The Representation Function. Arlington: The Foundation for the Advancement of the Public Trust, Inc., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry. “The Determinants of Unionization: An Analysis of Inter-area Differences.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33 (January 1980): 147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Janet C. and Rudolph A. White. “The Legal Status of Collective Bargaining by Public School Teachers.”Journal of Labor Research 4 (Summer 1983): 213–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, Michael M. “The Growth of Unionism in the Public Sector.” Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Blacksburg, 1982.

  • Lieberman, Myron.Public-Sector Bargaining. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred.Principles of Economics 8th ed. London: MacMillan and Company, Ltd., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Frederic. “Effects of Right-to-Work Laws: A Study of the Texas Act.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 9 (October 1955): 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northrup, Herbert R. and Gordon F. Bloom.Government and Labor: The Role of Government in Union-Management Relations. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, Melvin W. “Unionism, Wages, and Contract Enforcement” in Joseph D. Reid, Jr., ed.,New Approaches to Labor Unions, Research in Labor Economics. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Joseph D., Jr. “Labor Unions and Labor Management: 1900–1930.”Business and Economic History 11 (1982a): 150–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Labor Unions in the American Economy: An Analytical Survey.”Journal of Labor Research 3 (Summer 1982b): 277–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Tax Revolts in Historical Perspective.”The National Tax Journal 32 (June 1979): 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Understanding Political Events in the New Economic History.”Journal of Economic History 37 (June 1977): 302–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____ and Michael M. Kurth. “Public Employees in Political Firms.” Working Paper, Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (April 1983a).

  • _____. “The Importance of Union Security to the Growth of Unionism.” Working Paper, Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (December 1983b).

  • _____ “The Organization of State and Local Governmental Employees: A Comment on Dalton.”Journal of Labor Research 5 (Spring 1984): 191–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Arthur.Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jane E. “The Impact of Right-to-Work Laws Through Information Costs on Union Decertification Elections.” Unpublished, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Spring 1981.

  • Smith, Russel A., Harry T. Edwards and Theodore Clark, Jr.Labor Relations Law in the Public Sector, Cases and Materials. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon. “Dynamic Hypothesis on Bureaucracy.”Public Choice 26 (Fall 1974): 127–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reid, J.D., Kurth, M.M. The contribution of exclusive representation to union strength. Journal of Labor Research 5, 391–412 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685090

Keywords

Navigation